"it takes very little to p0wn an outdated Linux machine as well - without any Windows help"
Running Windows executables requires a bit more - or would they have installed Wine on a server?
40413 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
It's a fairly complicated set of events. "Years" can start at different dates. Academic years (at least in the UK), for instance, start with the Autumn or Michaelmas (YMMV) term. The church's year started on the assumed date of Christ's conception, 9 months back from Christmas, i.e. March 25, Lady Day. That also became the starting date for a lot of commercial arrangements. However there was also a tradition that January 1st was the start of the year so you may well find dates in the first few weeks of the year being given along the lines of 1722/3. I know of one published early C18th diary which starts years in January and some years are labelled in that fashion and some in modern fashion.
England and colonies stuck to the Julian calendar long after many countries had gone over to the Gregorian (but not all at the same time) and by 1752 the two calendars were 11 days out of sync. This was solved by omitting 11 days from September so the calendar for the start of that month reads 1 2 14 15 16 and January 1st was set as the start of the year in accordance with the Gregorian calendar.
This introduced a potential problem with contracts. That was solved by having the contracts which covered that period run for the appropriate number of days. So a contract taken out on March 25 in 1752 would expire on April 4th 1753 and a new contract would start on April 5th. The "loss" of 11 days was problematic in itself so it's not surprising that nobody wanted to tinker with changing contract terms as part of the legislation. On the basis of not fixing what wasn't broken, nobody has tinkered with it since so the UK financial year still runs from April 5th - and try to visualise the complications and expense it would cause to change that now.
Of course businesses are free to arrange their accounting years whenever they like and if a business thinks it's a good idea to go through the accounting year turnover when everyone's feeling a little under the weather, good luck to them.
"So the world according to Unix began on 1970-01-01"
Not at all. The folks who developed Unix knew about negative numbers. The cal command command, for instance, will calculate calendars for dates much earlier than that. Try cal 1752
They were an erudite lot (more erudite than VCs it seems). man cal in V7 Unix listed as a bug that taking Jan 1 as the beginning of the year was historically naive.
It would be interesting to see what would happen if someone found GCHQ in their system and took out a private prosecution. The first para of the ruling includes this statement: "The now well established procedure for this Tribunal is to make assumptions as to the significant facts in favour of claimants and reach conclusions on that basis, and only once it is concluded whether or not, if the assumed facts were established, the respondent’s conduct would be unlawful". There's a legal saying that facts alter cases. A specific set of facts in a specific case would seem to override the assumed facts (an oxymoron if there ever was one) of this hearing.
And I wonder if this quote from the act "No entry on or interference with property or with wireless telegraphy shall be unlawful if it is authorised by a warrant issued by the Secretary of State under this section." could be the basis for an argument that it attempts to put the Secretary of State above the law.
"There is a type of manager who believes that management is a profession in its own right."
I think it is, or at least it's a skill. Unfortunately it's a skill that very few managers have. It's even more unfortunate that so many organisations have a career path that doesn't involve promoting people skilled in their original profession into management. It makes as much sense as, say, promoting a chemist to an accountant (or vice versa). That doesn't stop people doing it. The end result is that the work ends up being done by people who either haven't been doing it long enough to show themselves fit for "promotion" or have been doing it for some time and shown themselves unfit for "promotion" and managed by people who would be excellent at doing the work but are almost all unfit to manage.
"I don't wear interview clothes except at interviews, and only when pressed."
It's nice that you keep your interview clothes pressed. ;)
I had one client who needed me to go on site at their client's head office & insisted that I wear a suit (there being a heatwave on at the time). You know something's wrong when you're confined in a distinctly un-pressed suit & tie in a meeting with the (client's) client's manager and he's in disreputable shorts, even more disreputable T-shirt and sandals.
"Personally I mostly use streetmap"
So do I. AFAIK they don't have any APIs which would enable them to be used by other sites. Possibly there are limitations in their licence with the Ordnance* Survey which prevents this. I wish it were possible to have them in the OpenLayers plugin in QGIS.
*NOT Ordinance!
"I never really bothered with Streetmap - I found it was pretty useless compared to Google Maps"
Really? It's ironic. Google maps are actually no more than road & street maps plus aerial/satellite photography. Streetmap's maps are the real deal OS maps, crammed with detail. But I suppose you actually have to be good at map reading to get the best out of them.
"IT35 stops tax avoidance"
What's that? Did you mean IR35? That means applying a tax regime that assumes the cash flow of a salaried position* to a business. However I share your concern at the original statement.
* Tax systems are designed by people on steady incomes who believe that that's how everybody else is employed.
"The answer was always that in theory there was - but that in practice the real world data was too awkward."
That rings a bell. I and colleagues took a few things to a stats guru. It didn't seem to be the case that the out-of-the-book processes fitted and he produced something tailor made for us.
"1) Did you do any internships? What did you learn there? If you just went on vacation for your summers you're useless to me."
OK, I get the vacation bit. But you were only accepting students who were well enough off not to need paid employment wherever they could get it. Or was that a filter to ensure they could afford to live on the pay you were offering?
"Due to the skills gap, why would you invest in training when these skills are highly transferable and the big players can always outbid you when you've trained a grad to be usable?"
What you actually mean is that the market rate is what the big players pay and if you're not prepared to pay that then you won't attract or retain staff irrespective of whether you or someone else trains them. That's life.
"However, one of the recommendations ...is to better understand what employers mean when they say they are not fit for the market."
This year, the market is probably looking for 3 years experience in W10.
And whilst grammarians argue that split infinitives aren't really grammatically incorrect they can still be ugly.
"Care to guess just how peeved I am?"
So if you wish to speak to your MP, say to complain about this bill, to raise an issue about ill-treatment of a relative in a nursing home or anything else you don't want that to be a protected communication? Or did you not stop to think?
"A) Weakening encryption endangers U.S. government data. The Office of Personnel Management hack and the Sony Pictures hacks being an excellent examples."
Your second example isn't government data. So make that "government and business data" just to remind them that their commercial backers might be watching how they vote.
Back in the day SCO had a Unix version that just worked. At the time any version of Linux only just worked if at all.
Drivers for both were a problem because a lot of H/W vendors were only interested in Windows and Netware. OTOH because this was still dumb terminal time there was SCO specific H/W such as multiple serial interface cards.
They were competing with free-as-in-beer for unsupported Linux and not-free-but-probably-not-as-expensive for Linux with support contracts. They were also, in the long run, competing with Windows for the Intel server market.
If SCO had had any nous they could have cut prices, paid H/W vendors to develop drivers and tried harder to get application developers on their side. At one time they did have a free as in beer offer for developers which included all the development extras supporting only a couple of users or so but the licence was only supposed to be for 6 months IIRC (although it didn't self-destruct) and I don't think the offer ran for very long. Maybe they didn't think Linux was going to get good enough.
I doubt that even if they'd done more they could have strangled Linux at birth or even retained their overwhelming Unix market share but they could have remained viable and maybe kept some server market share away from Windows as well. But they didn't do enough make it worth while for ISVs to continue using the platform and that's what killed them.
Meanwhile Linux improved to the point of just working and attracted ISVs.
"the lengths banks go to to make their emails look like phishing."
And thus train their customers to fall for phishing. With a bit of luck this will encourage banks and other businesses which should know better to tighten up their internal procedures. If this means a few marketroids get fired for breaching them it's a double gain.
"what do the rest of you do - run your own 24/7 redundant and monitored mail infrastructure? Or use gmail/Hotmail?"
Neither. Use a 3rd party service to host my own domain. Along with Hotmail where it's likely spammers will get hold of it. Set up a mail alias for each bank, insurer or whatever - and kill it if they decide to send valuable marketing communications spam.
It's a bit of a half-arsed report. I have a choice of 2-2 and 3. No mention of them. Did they really look at just one version?
In any case, removing it (2-2) seems to have no effect. LibreOffice continued to render Gentium which seem to be the only font family I had installed that uses it.
"Mocking customers killed Ratner's too."
He did it a bit more openly than small print.
IANAL but I don't think this would protect them under UK consumer protection legislation. Less familiar with the rest of Europe but I doubt it would protect them there. US? Maybe someone there knows; is there consumer protection legislation to over-rule contract terms?
A quick look at my .mozilla/plugins (in Debian 7) revealed a number of links placed to a Java plugin by Crossover Office. Despite Crossover Office supposedly being removed long ago there was a .cxoffice directory containing the library. In addition there was a .netscape/plugins directory containing similar links; the dates suggest that Crossover Office created that entire path. Wine doesn't seem to have set such links.
There was also a dead link to Java in a long removed LibreOffice 4.2 installation. Subsequent LibreOffice versions don't seem to have set a link.
With those links removed the relevant Java plugin disappeared from the browser. There's still an Iced Tea plugin but that's set as ask to activate. Iced Tea Java in installed from the Debian repository.
Of these I only expected Iced Tea. Clearly applications can casually install Java in the browser even if you don't expect it. Vigilance is needed.