"The Transformation Programme brings us the opportunity to become a standard-bearer for the government’s digital delivery agenda. We have already made progress here, becoming an exemplar Government Digital Service organisation."
BINGO!
40413 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"QR code is unsafe, and like URL shorteners a great way to lead to malware."
AIUI this system reverses the normal QR situation. The customer, via the phone, presents the QR code to the store. The customer is not at risk of a malicious code and, if the till software is in any way sane, it's not going to interpret the code as a URL. If the code doesn't make sense within the requirements of the payment system it's just going to decline the transaction.
What's not clear in all this is how the system guards against fake codes. I take it there must be some dynamic element in generating the code.
"Hopefully now we have a new PM she will actually lay out a plan and get on with it."
I take it you were a Leaver. Don't you have any suggestions as to what a good plan would be? Other than hoping that the existing incumbents would be able to think of something which, AFAICS must have been one of the Leavers' plans; the other being "magic happens".
"Hell, I'd even offer to pay it out of my pocket is I was given choice between Windows and Mac/Linux."
That's generous. But what would you pay out of your own pocket when one of your business's customers comes along and wants to know why you've put personal data about him on computers, maybe in the US, that you don't control and he wants to see you in court about it?
"Why is it not possible to have a single article that mentions microsoft or windows without some moron (or group of morons) telling us that they have either stopped or are planning to stop using it?"
Have you stopped to think why? Maybe you should start from considering the possibility that they're not morons and then carry on by asking yourself what it tells you about their experiences with Microsoft & Windows.
"And thus companies like M$, FarceBook, crApple and the Chocolate Factory get to squaf all their data to the authorities and sell it to the highest bidder without concern."
Frankly, I'm less bothered about those companies. You deal with them direct if at all and as you should know what they're up to you can make your choices accordingly. The real problem comes with dealing with a local company that then ships the data overseas, maybe unbeknown to you. A company like your employer which might use an on-line HR system, maybe. Or a company that uses an on-line CRM system. Or a bank that shares data with a credit reference bureau. Those are cases where you haven't much choice at all or no informed choice.
"right of access for Eu subjects to USA court"
That's not acceptable on practical grounds. The redress needs to be in the data subject's own jurisdiction against the entity that shipped the data into the clutches of the US. Each business will then have to think carefully about whether they wish to ship data there or insist on it being processed where they have effective control.
"I'm sure our nice new PM with her well-know concerns for data protection and individual privacy rights will swiftly negotiate a nice treaty with the US to allow them to take any UK data they like when they like and do whatever they want with it."
Not if she's any sense. UK service companies will want to do business with EU customers. Unfortunately that's a big if.
"Every five years or so"
I doubt it will take so long. I think we'll very quickly get to the state where the writ's issued the day after the current attempt comes into force, if not on the very day. At some point it will become clear that the only solution will be for the US to introduce proper privacy legislation (at which time selling double glazing and central heating in hell becomes profitable) or data has to stay in the jurisdiction at arm's length from any US corporation. Maybe European companies will supersede US ones in the market.
The smart US businesses will start restructuring there operations to do this before it becomes absolutely necessary.
"Disks are way too big these days"
So there's the basis for a defence strategy - copy on write. Then apply the sort of approach these guys are taking to detect file changes - if the file changes look OK surplus old copies can be quietly garbage collected.
However, I still think the best approach is one where user programs don't get direct access to the files, they request a server and there should then be a means for the server to verify the requesting program - cryptowhatnot doesn't get the ability to read and write your spreadsheet and it's not the recognised client to get the server to do that for it.
"It has nothing to do with structuring data within one"
Maybe what they should have worked on is a spreadsheet-like interface to allow the user to design the database. Something that would quietly turn those spreadsheet-used-as-database monsters into real databases.
"occasional comment-gems buried in ye olde codebase"
I once used Microsoft (or maybe MicroSoft in those days) FORTRAN for CP/M which included assembler for some library stuff. In the middle of that was a note left by one dev for another to the effect of "I can't get this stuff to work, can you?".
"Using lots of asterisks was a common habit on monochromatic terminals"
Monochromatic terminals? Luxury! Kids, today! Don't know they're born! We used them with punched cards and fanfold. (I miss fanfold but cleaning out the "study" yesterday I discovered a whole box of it - but no music lines.)
"I know we generally disagree (on the EU at least)"
Not necessarily. As I've written here a number of times the EU has a severe democratic deficit. Maybe we don't disagree about that. Maastricht and Lisbon should both have been validated by referenda in all countries - and not Irish style referenda of vote till you get the right answer. What might have passed such referenda would almost certainly have been very different to what happened; in fact we might still have just had the EEC as a trading arrangement.
However just walking out is economically daft and some of the areas which will catch the worst effects are those where foreign companies have set up so business so as to be in the EU and are major employers. Those seem to have voted leave - turkeys voting for Christmas. I also think that a referendum should require a large majority - another commentard mentioned the term "supermajority" - to effect a change in the status quo in such a major, permanent way. I'd also apply that to the unfortunately hypothetical referenda that should have validated the earlier treaties. Maybe we differ on those.
As to Blairalike that's been my term for him since he came to prominence. The Tories were so hypnotised by Blair that they went for the nearest thing in their own ranks. They could have done much better.
"I suppose I'm being naive, but surely these bots could be easily equipped with some sort of incapacitating knock-out gas - perhaps with explosives as a final measure?"
If, as the article reported, this was a bomb disposal robot what they'd have available would be an explosive charge. Can they put the whole scene on hold whilst somebody knocks up an alternative gas dispenser and tests it to make sure it can deliver the required dose?
"The large bomb disposal robots we have seen in news and films are different to a bomb carrying robot."
According to the article this was a bomb disposal robot. They use a small charge to disrupt the suspect device (that was actually the purpose of the shotgun on the Wheelbarrow device) or blow open car boots etc. If the gunman is holed up it doesn't matter whether he sees the robot being rolled up or not, in fact it might be better if he does as it might encourage him to surrender.