Re: The Way Good Software Is Done?
'Also sounds like the the scrum master you refer to either does not understand "stand ups" or did not explain it to you.'
For anyone with a bad back stand-ups are an HSE issue.
40557 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Meetings should be constrained by the size of the teapot: 4 or 5 mugs at most; brown jenny on special occasions."
With experience I learned not to be upset by the size of the original meeting. A quick look round inevitably showed the following:
A few strangers, sent along by someone or other and looking slightly dazed.
The occasional known trouble maker.
Two (seldom more) other people who'd helped do the work on other projects.
Once the formalities were done, just work with the last lot as before, but sound out the first lot as some of them might actually know what's what.
OK, I've said this before but it's worth saying again.
Security requirements should be built into UL testing. Add FCC declaration of conformity and CE.
I'm not sure about FCC declarations but CE is a matter of self-certification so it might need a few prosecutions for false marking before that would fully hit home but the principle would be established: if you want to get it to market, build in security from the first design stage onwards.
Old Englishman or just old fool?
"We need out of the ECHR in particular."
I suggest you dig into this a little further. You'll then find that it was the idea of another old Englishman of whom you might have heard: Sir Winston Churchill. I think most of us would reckon that what was good enough for Churchill is good enough for us.
"The NI-Eire border being the most obvious one. (If the UK left the EEA it would become a customs border, because there would be no free trade agreement, so how could it be completely open? i.e passports won't be needed, but goods would need to be checked.)"
OTOH it's difficult to see how it could be completely closed. Not only are there farms which straddle the border, there are buildings that do that. Who's going to check when you bring your shopping in through the front door in one country and carry it to the kitchen in another?
"Like the 'harmless' genetically altered vegetables."
I don't know if it's still the practice but genetic engineering techniques used to include splicing antibiotic resistance genes in as markers. That was the worrying biological aspect to me. The worrying business aspect, of course, was the behaviour of Monsanto.
So BT, via OpenReach, will end up subsidising Sky & TalkTalk who want to avoid making their own investment. Inevitably this will result in more cherry-picking at the expense of universal service provision as happened during the years that BT was prevented from rolling our fibre at all. Or am I reading this wrong?
"a great number of the passengers don't have long to live anyway"
Oi! Less of the ageism!. Don't just assume that we oldies voted Leave. Some of us voted Remain. After all we have children and grandchildren to think of. And, speaking personally, I'd like an economy that's still able to pay my pension.
"North East is the only region of the country with a balance of payments surplus - that is to say that exports more than it imports (largely thanks to Nissan)"
Who set up there because it was in the EU and who now have no great incentive to continue investing there.
"...allow the Asian competitors to create cheap, reliable and enjoyable cars that the British public are loving. They then move into Europe..."
In case it's escaped your notice those Asian competitors are producing cars in Britain now. They're doing so because that gives them an EU manufacturing base.
You're right in that they'll move into Europe. They'll move into Europe because they'll want to continue having an EU manufacturing base.
The odd thing is that it seems that the areas where they currently have their factories voted for them to leave. This will be the second UK car industry destroyed by its workers (the native industry was pretty-well banjaxed in the '70s). What makes you think anyone will want to provide us with a third?
I wonder if May is playing a strategic game. The Brexiteers have been given jobs of setting up deals. At some point whatever they come up with can be put before the HoC as a basis for invoking Article 50. The govt. doesn't actually have to recommend the proposal and she could even lay down some criteria to be met to gain a recommendation.
If they can actually put a viable proposition together then all well and good. Personally I'll be surprised but pleased. If not it will be up to them, the Leave campaigners, to accept that they couldn't make their good idea work at which point it can safely be remembered the referendum was only advisory. In the meantime any malcontents on the backbenches can be added to the team so they can accept their share of responsibility.
" If the BBC want money then make good programs that everyone wants to watch. Not the usual gardening, nature watch, antiques, cooking, dancing, Eastender crap."
Has it occurred to you that there are few if any programmes that everyone wants but that the programmes the BBC chooses to make are those for which it has the largest number of people wanting to watch?
"The BBC do not produce anything worth watching anyway, every time I see a BBC channel"
You also say "Although, in the 5 years or so I've not paid for a TV license" so are we to take it you're watching someone else's TV?
"it's deadenders, antiques shows, house buying/selling"
Such programmes have audiences sufficiently large that it's worth making those programmes. Indeed, if you're watching someone else's TV in order to see these then it would appear that your hosts are amongst that audience. Maybe that audience wouldn't want to watch the programmes you'd prefer.
" or biased news."
I take it that this means news that doesn't reflect your own biases. As a general principle I'd expect that the more effective a news organisation is at avoiding bias the more likely it is that people will consider it biassed, an artefact resulting from their own biasses.
"There used to be a show called Top Gear that was fairly good, but even that's been messed up now."
Now there you have a point.
"We have met and continue to engage with the ICO on personal data usage. We regularly review the ICO’s published guidance about current and future legislation, particularly in relation to GDPR. We comply with all aspects of the Data Protection Act and take the operational privacy and security of people’s personal information very seriously."
I recognise all the words but have a problem extracting meaning. I do, however, recognise the last bit. It occurs frequently in association with "only a few customers were affected" or similar expressions.
"If the UK is to participate in cloud computing, we cannot do it with asymmetric services. It's no good having 30mbps download and a 5mbps upload. You can’t upload all your material into the cloud."
This assumes I want to participate in uploading all my material, whatever that means, into the cloud.
It's as well to remember that if you do upload a lot of stuff into the cloud you're liable to find that some of it gets deleted because of excessive use of your unlimited storage.
"Essentially you have a computer with an array of DVB-S2 cards."
Or one DVB-T card with a couple of tuner modules on it. As it can take several streams from a single physical tuner you'd be hard pushed to find enough simultaneous watchable programmes to exceed its limits. In fact, I'm not sure mine uses the second tuner very often.
"there was a dearth of programmers interested in writing software for Windows"
There may be something in this. At the time there was a DOS office suite called Smartware. My employers of the time were big users. Informix bought it. In one of several inexplicable decisions the then management team made they didn't port it to Windows (they did contrive to add Informix as a back-end storage for Smartware - but only to the spreadsheet component and not to the database). A bit of rationality there could have seen them taking over the Windows office market. In the end IBM took them over instead.
"That depends to a large extent on what you need a computer for. If, for example, you're into full time publishing, then you're most likely going to be running Adobe InDesign....Since engaging in that battle requires time, and time is money, then it's a no-brainer to run your business on OS X."
Like you I'm retired so I don't need that sort of thing. Writing. A little development, mostly with Lazarus. GIS. Any Unix-style OS does fine.
'They asked for someone with "5+ years experience with Solaris 10"'
I blame ISO9000 and similar crap for this. They have their quality manuals saying that everyone working with whatever should have a minimum of 5 years in it because it looks impressive. Unfortunately it's written by someone with a total lack of contact with the real world (my view of most quality wonks) who doesn't realise that (a) in some fields technologies turn over faster than that, (b) there's no way everyone arrives fully minted with 5 years' experience in anything and (c) there's no way on paper of distinguishing between 5 years' experience and 1 year's experience repeated 5 times.
"It's called job security, computers that just work leave you with nothing to do and management wondering what the hell you are doing all day.
Ironically I failed miserably at establishing job security by standardising, idiot-proofing and automating everything, which was my job."
You seem to have been very unlucky. Most companies simply go out and recruit a better class of idiot.