Re: I strongly believe it's time to strengthen the Schengen border...
"Christ LDS. You do a lot of postings!"
So does Anonymous Coward. Are you sure you're not actually several working as a team?
42407 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"The PM didn't exactly campaign for Brexit"
Nor did she campaign for it to any noticeable extent. She was a gone-native Home Sec who was induced to see saw the EU as an impediment to what her department she wanted to do. As everyone expected Remain to win sticking her head over the parapet wouldn't have been consistent with wanting to keep her job post-referendum. It paid off for her, for us not so much.
"But for the more entrepreneurial in the USA, I'd think there might be money to be made at the airport shops, car-rental or major hotels in renting out laptops/tablets/phones for visitors with a genuine-wipe on return."
I don't think I'd trust one, nor the genuine-wipe on return.
"USians will forgive a President damm near anything if they see actual wage growth in their salaries and pay cheques."
Would that depend on whether the wage growth exceeds inflation of cost of living or is the electorate not able to work that out?
"Do you a) change them all to new standard password (get one device, get them all) or b) Create and give them all unique passwords and keep them in an encrypted field in a database."
Because you want to act quickly, go for a) on the first pass. This gives you breathing space to implement b) when you've worked out a suitable strategy.
As this installation seems to have been intended to apply down to the level of every light-bulb in the place for easy of maintenance (yup, sure made life easy!) there might need to be a lot of people who needed access to the list so implementing b) might not be straightforward. It might even include a review of whether all the devices needed to be "smart".
"look at Open Office if you doubt me. "
Not Open Office but I look at LibreOfffice pretty well every day. And it's just as I like it. As is KDE. Why? Because the UX design crowd hasn't got at it and that's a good thing. Look at W10 if you doubt me.
Maybe you're not aware of this but the whole idea of an interface, programming or user, is that it remains stable even if the implementation behind it changes so that whoever uses it, either in code or at the desktop, doesn't have to change their use. The principle of interface/implementation separation was established decades ago.
Command line? Yes Linux has that when it's needed. So has Windows. In neither case will most users ever have to go near it. You had some point about this.
Varying user interfaces? People who live in houses with Windows shouldn't throw stones.
Look, we can see you Windows marketing shills a mile off. It's so sad you don't realise that. You do your cause no good at all, just the opposite. Put away that ancient script and go and do something useful like play in the traffic.
"Besides, how many full time positions do you reckon the licensing of Windows will cost?"
And how many full-time positions will be needed checking they've got the right licensing? Actually, in their case probably none - that would be a boat MS wouldn't want to risk rocking. But for anyone else.
"For instance with KDE they still haven't figured out a way to install program icons properly into the menu due a lack of standard way to do so. Not all programs that exist in Linux support KDE and so on. Making this a rather big problem."
Who's "they"? In general if the application exists in the distro it will have menu entries complete with icons installed. In addition 3rd party packages available as .debs will also install in the menu. Something you download as a tarball, maybe not. In any event I end up shuffling things around in the menu to suit myself, something that Windows seems to move away from with every successive release.
BTW there is a standard way to do it: https://www.freedesktop.org/
Gnome, like KDE, comes with a set of default applications. These are usually tied to the Gnome libraries. If they're deeply integrated into Gnome, Evolution for example, it's likely that you won't install them without bringing in the whole of Gnome with it even if it's not your default desktop. In general this isn't necessary although some extra libraries might be needed, I even run galculator as my preferred calculator.
I'm with you on systemd - when I found I couldn't get Wacom working with it I went to Devuan although I have concerns about their chances in the long run as systemd insinuates itself further into the Linux ecosystem.
As I said in another post, FreeBSD seem to see themselves as primarily a server OS which is why they might not be quite the ideal desktop. Nevertheless I'd have gone with it as desktop OS if Wacom had been better implemented.
"We're in the process of setting up a new company, but we too have this Linux vs FreeBSD debate"
I get the impression that the FreeBSD folks see themselves as primarily a server OS and the desktop stuff as a bolted-on extra they're not quite sure about.
FreeBSD on the server and Linux on the desktop might be the way to go. The one point I'd make about the server choice is whether you need commercial support; I haven't looked at what's available on the BSD side whilst the commercially supported Linux distros are well known.
"Outlook and Exchange are what keeps businesses dependent on Windows - only when you break that can you truly expect Linux to have a chance."
Munich use Kolab as a back end. I'm not sure how it compares point to point with Exchange but the relevant issue would be how well it suits their workflow. AIUI they worked pretty closely with the Kolab developers and for all I know still do so that's not likely to be an issue.
"Standard Windows 10 + WSUS would probably save a lot of time and money. They just need to test the patches, before they roll them out."
AIUI big Windows shops maintain their own standard image and re-image any new PCs based on this. It's probably not as much work as rolling their own distro.
These days there are also tools such as Puppet to help with maintaining standard Linux configurations in a large shop. It would be the sort of approach to adopt if starting from scratch now.
It would appear that you're referring to the UI. Unlike Windows you have a choice. If you don't like the standard Ubuntu interface (they got to W8-style before MS) then you have KDE, Gnome, XFCE or whatever a few clicks away. I don't know what the default Fedora is these days but again you have a choice. With W10 you have W10.
"People don't like change and moving from Windows to Linux is a kick in the nuts."
About like the kick in the nuts that Windows inflicts on its users every version. KDE 3 > 4 was less of a change than the usual MS infliction, easy to set up how I prefer and I've been able to keep that through successive upgrades. The Office application menus have been similarly stable. I like stability of the UI. That's an advantage of using Linux and its applications. Who wants stuff that keeps getting broken?
"Businesses don't care that you can choose from 3 desktop environment and a gazillion window managers, all with different features broken or missing. They need one, to standardize on."
Agreed. It's astonishing that they seem to go with Windows: a different UI with every version, all with something broken. They finally get multiple workspaces but at the expense of all the suckage of the rest of W10.
This just doesn't make sense.
KDE in appearance and functionality is pretty similar to a classic Windows except - oh, they've finally got multiple workspaces working on Windows now. Most distros are a good deal easier to manage than Windows - maybe Gentoo is different.
I've also tried FreeBSD. I'd like to switch to it - no systemd. It ran KDE as a UI I agree with you about the split personality, it needs something like synaptic to ease management of software management; having to flip between a web-site to search for software and command line to install it is just plain daft, however a GUI wrapper round it wouldn't have been impossible. In the end it fell down because I needed it to work with a Wacom tablet and the integration of that seems to have fallen by the wayside and I ended up running Devuan.
However good luck with W10, it seems to fit with your hair shirt approach.
It was that the apps were deplorable - whatever stock control system was in use routinely lost transactions between the factory floor and head office (so stock control was a joke and traceability worse) and I'm sure the standard "the source is on GitHub logic was invoked."
You're sure? Do you know?
There are good commercial ERP systems available to run on Unix-type back ends; I was using them years ago. The software houses behind them would also make custom changes. Again, I've been involved with just that sort of change. Given that a branch of HMG was the customer for that it's very likely that you've handled the end product.
Bringing people together into larger and larger conurbations is not a good idea. It means longer commutes on average. It's unsustainable. Governments should be giving tax concessions or other encouragement to forms of distributed working, be it working from home, smaller local offices or whatever. They probably will but years later than they should.
Projected move: Central London to King's Langley. Questionnaire sent round to see who would stay with the company. 80% said they would. Oops, King's Langley suddenly turned out ot be too expensive.
Actual move: Central London to Leeds. Hardly anyone stayed. Those who didn't included most of the top team whose idea it was and rumour had it that one of them still got a relocation package.
"Is it just me that finds the question strange?"
No. At one time the issuing of a receipt ensured that the transaction had been rung into the cash register and was a check against staff pocketing the cash. Now with most transactions not involving cash I suppose the accountants are looking at the fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a penny that the paper costs them.
"There are some real pitfalls to not having cash:
- if the Gov't decides to 'bail in' some of your money (as happened in Cyprus) then you have no way to avoid it."
And the pitfall to having cash: the government decides to demonetize it as happened in India. Whatever you do the government will find a way to screw you.
"those who can't cope with technology such as the elderly"
Ageism. The Politically Mandatory ism.
"Perhaps it is time to move your accounts to somewhere else but where?"
But where indeed.
In my preferred location HSBC closed their branch. I moved (after 40 years or so with Midland, Northern, HSBC) to Lloyds. They closed their branch. I moved to the Co-op, not because they had a branch there but because they had a branch with more convenient opening hours inside a store. They closed that. YBS, who are the only financial business still open there, took over a building society that had a current account so I expected them to roll out that to the whole network; now they're closing the current accounts instead.
We hear about the so-called challenger banks. If they want to do some serious challenging they really should look at where the existing banks are wide open to challenge: customer service in places where customers live.