Re: When I were a young lad...
That would be alleged chicken soup but the tea is invariably worse.
42407 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"supposedly originating at Harvard Business School, that a good manager could manage anything: the students needed to learn how to manage"
The first words spoken to any new students on a management course should be "Respect can only be earned." It wouldn't be a bad idea to repeat them at the end of the course. In reality I suppose it's an unknown fact to those running the courses.
"hiring delivery managers (God knows what they're delivering"
I was sent on one of those intelligence insulting courses attended by various victims from different parts of a large telecoms company. Our local director was one of the big bods running the show and one of the ways he distinguished himself was by demonstrating he knew nothing about the Iron Triangle - couldn't see why you couldn't have all three.
Anyway, typical introduce yourself start. I went first and explained what my job was. Succeeding victims said progressively less untill it came to a complete wanker who simply announced loudly "I deliver". I don't know how I resisted an audible murmor of "Oh, a van driver.".
Similar experience. Offered the long withheld promotion with none of the usual formalities. If the previous director had been in place I might have tried my hand at negotiating for it to have been back-dated a couple of years without actually withdrawing my notice. It would have increased my eventual pension by 10%.
MS and Google would very likely fire a developer who didn't abide by check-in rules. Linus can't do that because he doesn't employ them so all he can do is not accept their patches. On the whole his approach works pretty well: it doesn't deliver overwight "Do you feel lucky?" updates on a monthly basis.
"Policies on photography would be independent of that, since they may have any number of other things they could use to take pictures."
Ah, yes, policies. I went with a client's manager to the office of their client, one of the usual suspects in the outsourcing world. When we got there we were told any phones with cameras had to be left at reception. Policy.
They didn't mention regular cameras so my client kept his in his pocket.
"KDE has nothing to lose. There are no allies or affiliates to annoy or estrange.
More of this sort of thing, please."
I agree it's a good thing to do. But it seems they're trying to do two things at once. One is produce a KDE showcase, the other is to try out all sorts of more or less experimental system architecture stuff. Both are laudable things but the latter isn't yet mainstream. As a regular KDE user I'd be very reluctant to switch to this as a daily driver; if the underpinnings were more mainstream I might. In that respect I find it difficult to see it as something to offer as a Windows replacement.
OTOH I can see how it would be a Windows replacement for all the wrong reasons. If its far enough off the beaten track it could be set up as a vendor's OEM installation maintained by the vendor's OEM systems and if the vendor then declares EOL there's then no chance of doing an apt distupgrade; it's upgrade by land-fill time.
I was going to make the same point. It is truly amazing how organisations will lock themselves into situations which are not only expensive but where the expense is out of their control rather than make an investment in retraining. They need to take a fresh look at capex vs opex issues. Vendors have successfully trained customers to me capex-averse and are now exploiting the situation.
Saxton and da Souza are both missing the point. Outside their limited remits the internet has become the communications medium on which the modern world depends. Their bans and introduction of "friction" are impractical for the world at large and would be immensely damaging for any country that introduced them unilaterally.
The simple molecules - the components of RNA, amino acids etc. are known to have been formed by abiotic processes. The nature of life is that assembling them into reliably working enzymes requires protein synthesis directed by RNA and catalysed by enzymes including those that attach specific amino acids to specific t-RNAs. Reliably coping RNA* requires more enzymes. Just working out how that archetypal chicken and egg situation might have come about from the abiotic mix might reasonably lead you to think that it was impossible were it not for the fact that it happened. That it might happen twice seems overwhelmingly unlikely let alone that it would happen twice in neighbouring planets. I can't help feeling that exo-biology is an example of extreme example of observer bias.
One difference between early life and now would be that DNA would have come along later. The business end is handled by RNAs.