Re: oh yea..
"Spelt wrong" depends on which side of "the pond" you are on.
Kudos has to go to Voland for the ideal Transpondian post which included both.
40557 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"it's their choice to live out there and they have to take the rough with the smooth"
Ah diddums. Seriously, have you stopped to think what would happen if everyone from rural areas moved into the towns and cities? Would you be able to afford to live there any more because the house prices would shoot up? And the house you could afford might be several times your existing journey to work.
Seriously, the better solution would be to concentrate on enabling as much employment as possible to move out from the towns and cities by improving rural communications and converting some of the newly vacant office space to residential so that the remaining urban workers could live close to work so that there's be less distance to commute. It would be far more sustainable that the present situation which has been driven by over half a century's worth of planning policy dedicated to separating residential and employment areas.
"This discussion has been going on for years and will continue to go until someone steps up and just gets it done."
People keep throwing in these words like "always" and "just".
If someone should "just" get it done why not you? All you have to do is buy a lot of fibre, a lot of gear, recruit and train a few thousand staff and arrange planning for all the street works you'll have to do. It'll cost you billions but, hay, you can borrow that. Of course you'll need to be able to sell the product at a price that at least covers the interest and repayment of the loans. If you hire the staff direct you'll have to pay redundancy when you lay them off after the project's finished. How long will it take? If by "just" you mean a couple of weeks it's going to be a hell of a big ask for everybody. Or is just going to stretch for a couple of years? Or a couple of decades?
Are you going to do that? How long will your "just" amount to?
Why do you think it's been talked about for years? Could it be because nobody wants to take the risks and make the investment for something that you think can "just" be done?
"Fibre has always been the way to go."
"Always" is a big word. Some of us can remember times when it not only wasn't the way to go but didn't even exist except when you melted the middle of a glass rod in a Bunsen flame and pulled the ends apart.
Of course telephones existed in those days and it would have been silly to have waited for fibre to be developed so they were connected by copper.
Some of us can also remember the times when cable was introduced and BT wasn't even allowed in so various other companies cherry picked the areas where they thought the best ROI was to be found.
It was only when the cherries had been picked that it was demanded that not only should BT cable up the rest of the country PDQ but that the erstwhile cherry-pickers should be able to piggy-back on BT's investments when they couldn't be arsed to make their own.
"It is in nobody's interests that there be a breach of privacy."
Did you leave out the sarcasm tag? Data is valuable these days. A breach of privacy would undoubtedly be in someone's interest. Maybe not those closely associated with the project but that doesn't justify such an open-ended statement.
"In Germany we have the principle of 'data minimisation', but we may have to give a little on that. Such a principle doesn't seem as appropriate when you are looking at big data,"
Wrong way round. Big data doesn't seem so appropriate when you are looking at the principle of data minimisation. It's big data that needs to give.
"His point was that they are set targets for delivery by the bean-counters who manage the funding"
But who made the original promises? If it was the bean-counters then they should keep them. If they were made by someone who didn't have the authority to implement them they shouldn't have made them.
If a schedule is made and published it should be with the sign-off of everyone involved, including the finance. And that everyone should then consider themselves bound by it. Yes, there could be external reasons why it can't be kept - fire at the exchange, for example. Accountants should not be external reasons.
"Some element of logic would indicate that there should be some state between structurally different states, for example, solid and liquid"
But the same element of logic would indicate other states between solid, the interim state and liquid. And iteratively...It's states all the way down.
It sounds more like processes of changing states. In the water/ice case there are already names for them: freezing and melting. That raises the question of whether this pseudo-gap is actually a state or simply a process of becoming or ceasing to be a superconductor.
Can we stop and think sensibly about this?
How many chip sets/software images are involved here? Not many, I'd expect. Vendors are wanting to take advantage of economies of scale. Small manufacturers don't generate their own economies of scale. They achieve it by buying in from large scale manufacturers who are selling components, including software, to all their competitors. Once the software is updated to take into account security requirements it can be sold on the same large scale just as effectively.
Look at things from the manufacturer's point of view. Making a product using version A of the software will result in lots of grief. A shipment could be seized in customs on import. Everything else in the container gets held back for checking. The manufacturer gets grief from the shipping agent who might well refuse any more shipments from him because he's getting grief from the other manufacturers who had stuff in the same container. Market places such as eBay and Alibaba (who, don't forget, are looking to set up a data centre business in the EU) won't allow the product to be sold through them. He might find other routes to a smaller fraction of the EU market but with higher costs or even simply stop selling to the EU. Competitors selling version B would have no such problems.
Does the manufacturer have any particular attachment to version A? Does he have some predilection for selling illegal stuff? Of course not. He just wants to sell as much stuff as possible as profitably as possible and if that's achieved by selling version B like his competitors are doing that's what he'll do too. No point in saddling himself with something that puts him at a disadvantage before he's even shipped the stuff out of the factory.
Now look at things from the software vendor's point of view. Version A has properties which cut him out of customers selling to the EU - and no doubt other markets will follow. A version B wouldn't. The volumes he's selling would spread the additional cost of developing version B very thinly. He could, of course, try to increase his profits and sell version B at a price which would force his customers to raise their prices. If, however, he has competitors competition will keep the price down. If he has no competitors and tries boosting the prices he'll soon find he's acquired some.
Now let's go back to the manufacturer again. He can ship version B of the software for the EU market (and any other market which follows suit) and version A for markets that don't care. Why would he? Having two product lines where one would do is just extra cost. Why bother? Come to that, why should the S/W vendor keep supplying version A?
The object of regulation and enforcement doesn't have to be complete detection of every infringing product. It simply has to be to make it more profitable to sell the non-infringing product.
"4) Stick to the gray markets where nothing's concrete enough for the law to reach."
Did you ever answer my question in another thread about these grey markets you keep going on about?
How do they grey market vendors contact the customer? They're not employing people to wander the streets to sidle up to punters saying "Wanna buy some hookey cameras? Come round the corner and I'll give you an address" are they?
They're advertising. They're selling through the likes of eBay. If you take note you'll find that eBay has a legal presence in Luxembourg. Luxembourg is inside the EU. They can be made amenable under legislation if they start advertising illegal stuff.
Then there are the customers themselves. If they're inside the EU they can also be made amenable for using such kit.
Enforcement of regulation doesn't need to be complete. It just needs to be good enough to give a competitive advantage to legal products. Why make an illegal product when a legal one is more profitable? That's all the difference you have to make.
"Don't get irritated when nobody wants to handhold you as to why you can't find the SysV init scripts."
Been using Unix & Unix-like OSs for almost as long as Poettering has been drawing breath and well before SysV. I don't seen any reason to change to something that no longer fits that description. If systemd-free Linux becomes unsustainable - and I accept that it might - I'll make the move to a BSD.
"Here in nottinghamshire they instigated a new 'savings' scheme by preventing out-of-area people using their recycling scheme (local tip to you and me). All 'customers' wanting to use their 'facilities' had to register and they were going to check to see if you were registered using a hand held device scanning your numberplate."
Have they combined it with tweaking specs for trailers, vehicles etc? Restricted what you're allowed to take (e.g. no rubble)? And have they then found the 'savings' impact of the fly-tipping everyone outside the council predicted?
"As a responsible consultant, you should be looking at the RFQ and highlighting areas where you think they may be deficient, and clarifying anything you think is ambiguous so that both sides agree what it means, all before providing the price and timescale quote."
If you ask questions that can't be answered (it'd require someone to do work) you'll be regarded as an awkward bastard and the contract will go elsewhere.
"Have Crapita ever successfully completed a project on time and to budget?"
As a sub-contractor to a sub-contractor to Crapita I was on two projects that completed on time. I couldn't comment on budget - outside my scope. I've retired since then so things might have gone downhill a bit.
"For any large organisation that rarely applies because big organisations have scale by definition"
For too many councils this simply extends Murphy's Law so mean that anything that can go wrong will do so on a larger scale and that there will be more things to go wrong.
"I do with Gnome. When they decided to go all single pane crap and dropped split pane in Nautilus (they could have left it as an option but didn't). Despite lots of complaints their answer was 'our way or the highway'. It was the final straw for me and I put on my walking shoes. I'm sure I wasn't alone."
Or as I said, broken. But it wasn't a no option situation. There were existing choices, that was the point.
"Say you're writing a script that will output the IP of the current machine, in bash you'd pipe the output from ifconfig through a grep and a cut or two (after thinking carefully about all the possible outputs and how they might break your regex), in Powershell you'd just reference (Get-NetIPAddress).IPAddress ."
Or
hostname -I
"Her car has automatic lights and in just a few years we now have people prepared to drive in the dark with no lights because they don't know where to find or how to switch on the lights any more."
Easily done. A few days ago I took SWMBO's car out - it's the one with 4WD & snow was forecast. Realised it's getting dim enough for the lights to have come on and they.. oh, they're not automatic. Never mind, the light switch is in more or less the same place as on mine...nope, that was her previous car. Then remembered it was on a steering column stalk.
"do you see a button that specifically says 'F12'?"
Slight snag with that. Laptop one: simply keying F1 - F12 gets the functions, holding down the fn key at the same time gets the hardware controls - brighter, dimmer etc. Laptop two: yup, you guessed it - the other way round. How do you know what the user has unless you're very familiar with the particular model.