Re: Close the door and turn of the light
Control of the press Twitter account is most important
42414 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"they can use it to dissuade law-abiding people from using encryption"
Not when the law-abiding people realise that this is their banking apps and online trading accounts that are affected. Nor the businesses that use VPNs to enable secure access to the office network for out-of-office workers.
Everyday business over the internet runs on encryption. Can you imagine the shit-storm that will break when it's discovered that the local dog-warden has access to his neighbours' bank accounts and that the govt has legislated to make that possible?
Undoubtedly bodies such as GCHQ know what May & Rudd want, i.e. the govt only back door, is nonsense. They also know that they're not going to be any better off with a bigger haystack. And they probably realise the drastic consequences of the politicians' shopping list of entitled agencies getting their hands on surveillance. But they also know that any words of wisdom from themselves will fall/have frequently fallen on deaf ears and their conditions of service prevent them going public.
What I'd really like is someone who's sufficiently lost their rag to retire and go public to the extent of saying "I've told these idiots time after time but they're just too stupid to understand.".
"If you live in the UK you voted for the party that appointed the current Home Secretary."
That, sir, is a libel.
There seems to be an odd notion about that because a (possibly slender) majority voted for something or someone then everyone must have done.
It's the same mode of thinking that enables Brexiteers to assume that the whole country voted for their madcap idea. They had a slender majority and it's very doubtful that if the referendum were to be repeated they'd actually achieve any majority at whole and yet they and, it seems, almost all the HoC are acting as if they have the entire country behind them.
"Also Nationwide ... but then you have to weigh the cost to yourself of a strop :) moving all accounts would be a *lot* of work, and end up spiting me."
I've done that twice - not with Nationwide because I've never been with them. If they give bad/negative customer service then don't stay as a customer.
" The data in the leak was no different to what you find in the dustbins on every gas station forecourt where someone pays by credit card, then throws the receipt in the bin as they pass it on the way back to the car."
That's the customer's choice. The AA leaking data isn't. There's a difference.
Prompt disclosure to be mandated by the GDPR isn't just some piece of arbitrary red tape. It's because it's a Good Thing. The fact that it's the best part of a year from becoming mandatory doesn't make it less of a Good Thing right not. It's not yet being mandatory in no way excuses the AA from acting properly.
"The last few decades have seen a fairly steady decline in real wages for a large swath of the working population while the costs of food, housing, and life in general have continued to climb."
There's nothing particularly recent about that. It was the same in the 70s. An FY fund is invaluable but almost impossible to put together when you need it most.
“fraudulently set up three Australian companies"
How would one set up a company fraudulently? I suppose one could use a false name. Otherwise one could legitimately set up the company even if the intent was to use it fraudulently but deciding on intent would be a matter for the courts to decide. Without evidence to the contrary it's entirely possible that this bloke thought he was being offered a genuine business deal.
The police wouldn't be trying to prejudice the trial would they?
"Our governments know (they must) that it isn't possible to provide this ad hoc, on demand 'illumination' without fundamentally weakening encryption as a whole"
I'm not sure that they do. As a group they include few with any technical nous and probably reckon that the experts are telling them it can't be done simply because it's a bit hard and they, the experts, just don't want to be bothered doing it. After all, they, the governments, are legislators and fully entitled to say what has to be done, the rest is just implementation for the ordinary people to get on with.
"In line with the expectations of our peoples we also encourage collaboration with industry to provide lawful and non-arbitrary access to available information where access is necessary for the protection of national security against terrorist threats."
Translation: people expect us to be up to no good.
"So which is it el 'reg?"
Oh, come on. You know the rules round here. A headline needs only have a passing resemblance to the article's content.
In this case the resemblance is that nearly half of DNS queries for any of all the .io domains could have become dependent on one of the server domains he'd taken over. ISTM that that's a better than average justification for an el Reg headline and a rather alarming one at that.
We had access to a Prime run by the Home Office. Its main use was to run a Lockheed bibliography database. It was possible to write well tuned queries for that, a characteristic which Google, Amazon and eBay seem to remorselessly root out of their query engines. The responses were in the form of references to microfilms of the original papers which were supplied to the labs which used it. Elsevier would have a blue fit if that were done today. The database was written in FORTRAN; for some reason a query managed to get it to start regurgitating the source code but I never managed to get it to repeat that trick.
We also had Pascal available. I can't remember what use I made of that but I must have done. We got our Onyx Unix box a little later and I sacrificed one of the TTY ports to connect to the link to the Prime (we must have had some sort of multiplexer on the Prime link). We didn't have tip, cu or the like on the Onyx so I explored the possibilities of fork() (and, indeed C which was new to me at the time) to write a simple equivalent so I could get on to the Prime from my lab instead of having to go down to the library. If I'd just been wanting to use the Prime for a literature search I'd have had to go to the library anyway to use the microfilm.
Again, thanks for a reminder of times gone by.
"if he ran one of these he did break the law"
That might not be a settled matter. If the ban on a COSUG was contrary EU law it could well be that the Appeal court could make the same ruling for a COMUG were the case to be put to them. It certainly would not be in the public interest to continue the case when the ban itself has been rescinded and there's a possibility of the Court of Appeal throwing it out were it to get that far.
"Most people who have a domain name use the rubbish mail that is given as a freebie as part of the hosting package."
My previous comment applies. There is nothing at all in the article to say that this is the sort of service being used here.
"I rest my case"
I haven't seen you produce anything that resembles a case worth resting.
"Sending an email using his sons crappy mail server"
Gordon, I'm glad you're not a judge as you seem to be unable to limit your conclusions to the evidence.
The article said it was a domain owned by the son. Owning a domain does not mean you run the server. Many of us own out own domains* but that doesn't mean we run the servers; it's possible to buy that as a service. Secondly, even if the son owned his own server there's still no evidence that it was crappy. For all we know the son might be running a mail service provider.
*It's a useful means of controlling spam - we can use it to issue temporary addresses or addresses specific to a particular company with whom we do business. Owning your own domain is also a good idea if you're running a business; $companyname.co.uk looks so much more businesslike than $companyname@yahoo.co.uk.
"the board can point the finger at $OUTSOURCER and deny responsibility."
And when it comes to court the court under GDPR will point the finger right back where it belongs. Or if it's something that affects financial performance the market will also hold the company responsible and amend its share price accordingly. You can't outsource responsibility.
"Accounting software gets updated as frequently as the taxation system changes, so at minimum once a year."
At a minimum indeed. Because if it's supplying companies trading in multiple countries there may be a whole raft of taxk changes happening at different times of the year.
But this is best done by keeping the executables as stable as possible and pushing the changes to tax rates as data, preferably human readable text data.