Re: How cute...
Did nobody ever tell them: "when you're in a hole, stop digging."?
42029 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"t's gonna be going very slowly at the end."
IIRC someone was killed in S Belfast by a stray from N Belfast which must be a comparable distance.
However I did for a while, have some sort of handgun round* on my desk with a nice fibre impression on it; it was said to have been stopped by an ordinary nylon jacket.
*Don't ask. I wasn't a ballistics expert. Someone just passed it to me do a fabric comparison.
"If senior management is being compensated in a way that encourages short term thinking - quarterly results"
This is an area where governments could actually make a difference: ban reporting at less than annual intervals. Yup, I know the arguments. But consider the possibility that the benefits might outweigh the disadvantages.
"my contract has always included language preventing me from working, directly or indirectly, for that customer for a couple years or so"
It sounds like you have a badly written an IR35 caught contract, at least in UK terms.
The contract should be between ClientCo or AgencyCo and YourCo not you. As someone said in a previous comment, start YourCo2 which never had such a contract.
that unbridled Capitalism has MBAs have managed to create an environment in which the company's own management is also the company's worst enemy
"It's also another proof that our governments are either criminal or criminally stupid."
Governments appoint MBAs to run companies? Some businesses have been run well, some run badly since businesses existed. Good businesses have fallen prey to bad management. What's it to do with government?
Might as well just say "Anybody who can get a job elsewhere, please do so."
Or this:
“In the last seven months I've pretty much worked constantly with five of my former clients, who have hired me directly to do the same work they can no longer find anybody at IBM to do.”
Non-compete clauses? IBM is repudiating its own contracts so it might have a hard time enforcing them.
"Did anyone claim a statement of fact? All he said is that they are true statements."
That's the point. They were statements but meaningless because they were incomplete. You have to be prepared to examine statements critically in order to understand what they actually mean - which might not be the same as what they appear to say.
"When I was at school we all had to do woodwork and metalwork - subjects for working class kids that were supposed to start working with our hands to make stuff."
I have a certain degree of sympathy with this point of view. Yes we had that sort of class and school and I discovered that basically I wasn't much good at it.
And yet an attitude that if you want stuff you can make it is important. I acquired it not so much from school as from my dad. Right now I'm sitting in the house that he built; not had built but built himself (OK, over the years I mixed a fair bit of mortar, concrete and Thistle by hand). Because he'd grown up with that attitude and also had the aptitude to go with it. Roll forward to post-grad times and, after a week's introductory FORTRAN (the first day of it missed because SWMBO and self hadn't got back from a week's field work) I discovered that if I wanted a program I could and did write it myself; I'd finally discovered an aptitude to go with the attitude. I eventually built a second career out of that.
"Schools should focus on teaching pupils a good grounding in Maths, the 3 Primary Sciences & English."
Actually the computing could be woven into those.
Back in the blimey-is-it-nearly-60-years-ago days at school the physics lab had a couple of spectroscopes with diffraction gratings. Working out how to get the 2nd order image of the sodium doublet and at least the first order of the neon that was present in the sodium lamb was a grounding for serious experimental work in later life. Now imagine if such kit (assuming schools still have such things) were combined with a stepper motor, a sensor and an RPi to automatically acquire spectra. That's how computing skills could be acquired along with ordinary lessons.
"I know that I can get a team of 4 brilliant developers from the Philippines for the cost of 1 contractor from the UK. I also know that I dont need to be in the same room, building or country as they are for them to work well."
You've missed an important point. You think they don't need to be in the same room etc. In fact there's a lot to be said for developers - we used to call them analyst/programmers - being able to talk to the people who were doing the work your S/W would be helping them with. That way you would find out what was actually needed. You could maybe fast-prototype something and get feedback.
Your 1 contractor in the UK, if carefully selected, working with the end user will be worth the money. The actual cost might work out closer than you thought and you'd likely get better value for money via a better product.
"Talking about saving money, my senior managers have lots of cash for constant moving around of departments and the associated building works that come with it, 4 years in a row I've had to move offices."
Just moving around? Real managers would have had at least 3 reorganisations in that time?
So often I get asked, "How quickly can you get a breakdown of historic research income by quarter separated by the gender ratio within the lab and gender of the lead investigator?" that when I reply "Two days, including testing, once I've finished this epic piece of coding I'll get straight onto it for you." I get "I could do that in Excel in, like, an hour".
It depends on how well you know your way round the schema. If all they want is a one-off you should be able to do it from a good SQL database in less time than Excel. It depends on your priorities and those you work with. They need to realise that if you're doing application coding and one-off queries.then the application coding is going to be delayed by a lot longer than the time you actually spend on the on-offs. However they might be OK with that.
"Even if people are aware of what they're doing is wrong or against protocol, they will still do it, because they don't want (short term) hassle - usually from the recipient(s)."
It's a matter of attitude. My last client before retiring took security very seriously because they provided secure services to clients. Irrespective of the inconvenience staff would observe secure protocols. As yet most businesses can get away without that. Gradually, as consequences get more serious and more widely realised things will improve. It'll just take bigger fines and more class actions before it happens.
"We have a student DB, but it's unwieldy, slow and crap. To get any changes made to it, you have to get the developer in to do a analysis, then the design, then the development, etc before it can be finally added and used."
I wonder why anybody does analysis and design. Could it be to try to prevent this sort of thing?
By letting - yes, there's an element of permission there, even if only be default - short-cuts to be taken your student DB is prevented from being improved. And so your management paints itself further into a corner so that, assuming you're in Europe, one day you find that you didn't really save money, all you did was postpone it until it was drained away in a big fine.