Re: Time for creative accounting
"he's encouraging corruption around the world."
He'll expect his cut.
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"even though they got precisely what they wanted"
I'm not sure about that. What exactly was it that they wanted? Did they all want the same thing? As someone else said, many complain it wasn't the Brexit they voted for. The thing is they weren't offered anything beyond leaving the EU and each of them had their vision of what that would have been and that was the Brexit they thought they'd voted for. Excepting a few who wanted to leave the EU as their sole objective I doubt many did get that Brexit.
"The truly scary scenario for those of us not directly affected, is to imagine what would happen if he and his team become competent in their malignant objectives."
You only need to look at Ukraine to see what happens when a kleptocrat has stolen everything in his own country. Trump has looked and learned from the master and is already eyeing up his next heists.
I think this is mostly what they do anyway. It's just that they have to adjust profit forcasts to write off the US as a market. The real problem for the US is going to be trying to sell to the RotW. They'll not be able to keep their costs steady as tariffs and the dollar fluctuate and they'll be seen as unreliable. The US wants Europe to spend more on defence/ If he was hoping that would be a market for US manufacturing the footgun has already seen to that.
It seems logical to ensure that DC infrastructure is located outside of the US, even if the users are inside. If the investment is in PCs then maybe the best solution is to repurpose old ones. Or maybe make the entire investment outside the US, locating users there as well. India seems popular for such purposes.
That's not what the USG intended? Any legislator, even a genius like Trump, needs to realise that people will react in the way that optimises outcomes for themselves. To be effective legislation needs to ensure that the optimisations are what the legislator wants.
I you examine the history carefully you will realise that Stallman was reacting to the fact that work he had done had been stolen by being paywalled. The GPL was designed to make that impossible in the future. The FSF and the FOSS movement comes from academia where the idea is, or was, to publish one's work and, for avoidance of doubt, "publish" meant "make publicly available". It's the commercial world that steals from academia, not the other way around.
This may be hard to grasp for someone who obviously believes that nobody gives stuff away and that anything free of charge must have been stolen, but please make the effort. You would do well to check up on the FOSS contributions of your "molochs".
There has, admittedly been a bit of bad blood resulting from start-ups jumping on the FOSS bandwagon without realising what they'd done and then getting upset when they found out. The moral of that story is that you should check what a licence means before you apply it to your product.
Not that this means I approve of anything OpenAI does - as far as I'm concerned they're just getting rid of the difficult bit in the title.
For real world uses I use Linux but have a W10 on a laptop. I started this month's updates about an hour & 10 minutes ago. It's only just gone to requiring a restate when it will spend ages finishing off what it couldn't update already. You think this is fit for everyday use?
"Has static electricity ruined your day?"
No, but I worked in a place where it had the potential (sorry!) to do more than that. A lab where one branch handled explosives and detonators and another handled live ammunition. I think somebody in that area did have a det go off due to static (I was about as far from them as I could be and still be on-site so didn't know everything that happened there.).
The solution was an earthed brass plate outside the door to any sensitive area. Anyone going in was required to touch it first. I recommend that to the design of any installation where static could ruin your day (or more).
If that happened the US would become a low cost manufacturing base able to sell iPhones to China. Of course the standard of living would fall, property prices would tank, houses would be repossessed and so on. Anyone with transferable skills would leave. Anyone without them might become illegal emigrants to Canada and Mexico.