"too comfortable leaning on AI for advice in situations where it's really not the best idea."
I don't think he had a best idea. Not even a vaguely good one.
42398 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"I know of a medieval French chapel (Catholic). It was once disassembled stone-by-stone and moved to Long Island, New York."
The London Bridge before the current one* was also disassembled and shipped to the US. It would have been bigger but not as old. Contrary to some stories, however appealing they might be, the buyer didn't think he'd bought Tower Bridge.
* Circumlocution to avoid calling it "old" as it wasn't Old London Bridge which was medieval.
"This should be cause for a big re-think. But that won't happen."
It might not happen to those in the supply chain. But as the M&Ss of this world who've been hit review their operations (as they should) or those not yet hit look around, they're the ones likely to be making the big re-think.
Why should Red Hat (or anyone else for that matter) store private information on Github rather than setting up their own, private repository? The answer, of course, is convenience. Let somebody else do it. In Red Hat's case they could scarcely claim they lack the skills. But it enlarges the attack surface. Maybe someone else in the Red Hat supply chain also had access to it and maybe somebody else had access to them.
It's yet another supply chain attack and if companies don't know by now that long supply chains are vulnerable - especially to social engineering attacks on their staff - we can be sure the attackers do.
The status might also depend on whether the members were individually responsible for the debts.
In the UK a registered charity has to file annual financial reports to the Charity Commission*. A not for profit business is different but might be run for the profit of those who provide it with its services or by is directors; although it cannot make a profit it can make a surplus which, apparently, is something quite different. (I used to belong to a user group which was run rather well be a small company. The vendor of the product of which we were users bought another corporation and wanted the two user groups to merge and be run by whoever ran the other one and who were hopeless. The group fell apart soon afterwards.)
* The trustees are personally liable. I'm a trustee of a local charity. Fortunately it's in financially sound but because our previous treasurer had health problems its reporting has lagged. We're now being chased for an outstanding report which we can't send until it's been approved at the next AGM which is due to be held this month.
Branch staff have been disempowered. If you have a problem it's best to try to sort it out face-to-face than on the phone or online. The situation is that I now have to travel some distance to be told they can't help. They enshitify the branches so that there's no point in visiting them and then use the lack of footfall to close them down.
Branches were more than sales points. They were where service was delivered, the service for which customers used the banks.
My problem with Lloyds was that they simply wanted a fee for what used to be just part of the service. The result was that they lost an account which was probably more valuable to them overall than the fee they tried - and failed to grab from me. Had they succeeded that would have been credited to the branch; the loss of business was probably not debited against them.
If they can't attribute the cost of customer churn where it belongs then they can't really get a true picture of what the branches' profit and loss. We see "challenger" banks being set up that are remote only. They're not really challenging the big banks, they're just emulating them. The bank that reverses this policy, established more branches and set one up near me gets my business. If that's not real sales I don't know what is.
I strayed from their clutches years ago. I'd strayed into them when HSBC closed the branch in my preferred location. Lloyds then closed their branch there too. Had that one still been open I might not have been antagonised by the surly staff at two other branches.
The problem customers have now is lack of alternatives as they're all more or less at the bottom of their respective barrels although still striving to get lower. We need HMG to mandate a reasonable (i.e. considerably higher than at present) density of branches in order to for banks to retain their licences. No, "banking hubs" won't cut it, they need staff empowered to act on the bank's behalf.
They're frequently told by the usual suspects here that it's either extremely confusing or downright impossible. The real sticking point for consumers and SMBs is that it requires installation of an OS and it needs to be done in such a way that their old data remains available to them. For IT departments that install their own Windows builds on new PCs that excuse doesn't hold up.
ISVs that will only develop for a single OS remain a problem and will continue to be so without Linux reaching a sufficient user base to (a) make it viable or (b) worry their competitors may jump first.
"Recently it has been replaced by some abomination that has nothing of interest to the average Reg reader. Full of flashy graphics and no substance."
Horizon?
OT: The Beeb is currently running programmes reflecting 200 years of railways. There was a recent one by Michael Portillo (of course) as part of that. After watching it I was amazed to find that it had only been an hour long. By current Beeb standards it would have taken at least two hours to present that much material. It was just like the old days.
"A lot of their value is freeloading off the backs of open source developers who worked on Pi software."
Oh, look. They're freeloading off the backs of Microsoft developers too: https://raspberrytips.com/windows-11-on-raspberry-pi/
And what about Intel? All those of us running Linux on our PCs! And AMD, too, of course.
Did it have a passenger? If so he's the person in charge, even if not in the driving seat as it was operating under his direction as he summoned it to collect him and instructed it to go to a particular destination. If would-be passenger s are likely to get tickets Waymo have a strong commercial incentive to make their cars drive better.
If it's unsatisfactory to consider the passenger the person in charge than the company should have a driver of record for the fleet, the exec responsible for the way the vehicles operate day-to-day. Whoever signs off the S/W as being fit for use on the public roads is responsible for what they do there.
From TFA: "difficulties with regulation, specific software only being approved for specific operating system versions"
This raises the question of whether the specific operating system vrsion is the same specific operating system version after an update has been applied and whether this conflicts with a likely requirement that the operating system be kept up to data.