Re: Bah!
"They seem to think that something changed in the way computers work sometime around 1986."
1986? When they were 14 (rolling date).
40485 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Microsoft is giving up on smartphones, but loves the idea of ARM-powered laptops running Windows 10."
It also loved the idea of smartphones and of ARM-powered Surfaces.
The problem with BigCos (Microsoft is far from alone in this) is that if something doesn't take off quickly enough (and "enough" seems to shrink these days) or its champion leaves the business then the product gets dumped along with all the customers and secondary vendors that had bought into it. Ironically this should make potential customers more wary so that it becomes harder to get something to take off. In reality Barnum applies.
"Closed providers build proprietary protocols over an open port....
These days, phones bypass the corporate firewalls so we could use any protocol we fancy."
And so we do things the convenient way. Once again convenience tramples security. More and more stuff gets done in the browser - more and more ways to deliver malware.
"a lot of these closed ecosystems are short-term fads so their longevity isn't an issue."
It depends what's in them. If it's every idle thought that wafted through idle heads then no problem. If it's somebody's only collection of photographs of their deceased parents (yes, I know) then it's a bigger problem. If it's a long piece of collective research then it's real pissing-off time.
Anyone remember geocities?
There may be merit in paying for what you get.
"PHB's see all training as a cost, and lump it all together."
Not entirely. Management training is fine. It might be completely irrelevant to the tech job but it becomes compulsory. If someone's handling their tech job well they must be promoted to management so they can be replaced by someone who can't do the job as well. The fact that the tech abilities are at best orthogonal to management abilities is irrelevant.
"Mine went this time last year."
This is the time to g freelance. You can then charge an appropriate fee for sorting out the problems they brought on themselves. For IR35 reasons, of course, it might be better to sort out problems that other people brought on themselves in like manner.
"In order to hit a roughly competitive pay grade (the public sector tends to pay a bit less, but to get it in the same ballpark) HR will hack technical job descriptions to make them look like management posts."
I had roughly this sort of experience. In order to make a competitive offer (e.g. they couldn't match the company care) they nominated the post as management. Fair enough, it involved systems management. One of the amusing aspects was that a little later the grade was given company cars. However HR eventually started having problems with the notion that what was essentially a technical post didn't have much people management content.
Then you get the idiots who say "must have 10 years experience in docker"
I suspect that this might stem from their ISO 9000 implementation specifying such nonsense. Whoever wrote the quality manual is patting themselves on the back saying "we only employ the highest quality staff" when it translates to "we only employ liars".
I do, however, habitually suspect ISO 9000 as being responsible for a lot of bad management.
"Much more sensible than installing backdoors."
It sounds more like looking for backdoors that weren't intended, keeping the information from the vendor but then sharing the information out among themselves so that it'll leak out further still. Remind me again, how did we come to have Wannacry?
How does this differ from black hat hacking?
"Or maybe the chance to strip out the snooping software and just run a few trusted applications?"
That's the question. It's one thing being able to move over into "real" Linux when you want an app that's not on Android. Can you also do that when you don't want an app that is on Android?
if the police claim not to know how much money they took, they can't be even forced to "give it back"
OTOH they can't prove they didn't take anything that was claimed. Consider a the possibility of a class action on behalf of all the citizens of New your who each had $1m improperly seized from them...
Oh, it's been repaired. That was quick.
"What MS are complaining about is a natural facet of the open source development and release process, namely the (public) master source code repository will be updated before a (public) build containing the fixes is made available."
The developer will have built an executable before updating the main git repository. That could be released as the production version but on the whole most people might not be comfortable with that. They could, however, have a staging repository which is, in effect, their main one, build the release version from that, release it and then bring the public repository into line.
"People won't use Linux if there are no games for it and manufacturers wont create games for Linux until there is a mass market for it."
I don't give a damn whether there are games for it or not. I doubt I'm unique. You might not buy it if there are no games. For other's it's not a factor and for enterprise markets it could be a positive advantage.
"Some of us actually need to exchange files with people who use MS Office; LibreOffice is NOT capable of doing 100% accurate round trips."
Don't you mean MS Office is NOT capable of doing 100% accurate round trips? Office users don't actually notice that the problem might lie with their software. They've been habituated to the need to keep updating Office because their old version wouldn't read, let alone round trip, a file written by a newer version.
"but just annoying complexity for the average punter."
In the meantime relatives with old XP boxes or W7 that got hit with ransomware seem quite happy with Zorin. I doubt anyone is ever going to sell a laptop with it installed but just burning a DVD of the latest version, sticking it in the drive, boot and install isn't exactly taxing and avoids the nightmare of having to keep supporting them on Windows.
"For many it's a choice between Windows, which they understand, or everything else, which confuses them."
Given that many now have experience with non-Windows devices and must have gone through multiple cycles of Windows and Office interface changes that shouldn't really be a problem. Frankly, it's Windows that I find confusing.
"Personally I just don't like the interfaces"
Of what? I've kept a pretty consistent user interface on KDE for many years*. What's more it's also pretty consistent with what MS used to have back in the days of W95 to W2K apart from the obvious gain of multiple workspaces. This is a major difference from the UI havoc that MS have wrought on both the OS and their applications.
* Plasma 5, however, is a bit of a problem. Every theme designer seems to have been swept up in the tide of flat, ugly, unfriendliness that's infected the rest of the desktop world. So far I've only been able to partly ameliorate it on SWMBO's new laptop.
" LibreOffice is fine. It writes basic .doc files perfectly well, however, once you switch on revision control and start passing the document through five different offices in three different countries/languages, all of whom are using MS Office, it is completely unworkable."
So, your point is that MS Office is crap because it messes up documents in good, solid ISO-standard format from LibreOffice? Non-portability was always an MS feature. It locked users into the old continuous upgrade path.
Whilst this is as wildly impractical as using DNA for data storage* it's worth pointing out that RAM, from magnetic core days onwards has generally had destructive reads. Reading has to be combined with rewriting.
* Yes, life has been using it for this for a very long time. And, although life is good at replicating and reading data the mechanism for adding new content relies on making errors in replication and then throwing most of the results out as useless.
"I think it is virtually certain someone has stolen my personal information including SSN from somewhere already"
I get the impression from the reports that you can almost be pwned just by walking past a hotel of one of the large chains.
"And as far as VAT numbers are concerned - what about the small-time sellers who fall below the VAT threshold?"
If I, as an individual, not a trader, have something I no longer need but has value I could sell it on eBay or I could sell it at the local auction house. In the latter case the auction house charges buyer and seller a commission and, because they're VAT-registered, charges VAT on that commission. If I were a trader selling through the auction house I'd have to treat the sale price as being VAT inclusive and deduct the VAT element from what I keep (allowing for the fact that I'd got the VAT on commission to partly offset this) but that's my responsibility as a trader. The auction house doesn't have any authority to determine which of these applies and, therefore, can't get involved further. I can't see why eBay should be expected to do something the local auction house doesn't; after all they have less contact with sellers than the auction house who have the seller roll up at the door with the actual goods.
The point raised about VAT invoices is an interesting one I'd never thought about concerning real auction houses. As a buyer there I've no idea who the seller is; if I were a VAT registered trader buying something for my business how would I go about getting a VAT invoice for anything more than the commission?
"What have the paying out companies done wrong?"
Failed to provide copies of the source for the binaries, either with those binaries or on request from recipients.
"Why is he able to claim all this?"
A very good question. Apparently German law allows him to act unilaterally.
"I could do what I want. I would have assumed that those writing code for Linux would have had some similar agreement but maybe not."
There are a few differences.
First, whatever any one individual writes is merged with the contributions of many other people in a collaborative effort. Why should you then act unilaterally, possible contrary to what your numerous collaborators want?
Secondly, the purpose of the GPL is to encourage sharing of source code, not to collect fees from users. This is why organisations such as the SFC mentioned in the article aim for compliance, not penalties.
Thirdly people contributing to Free Software projects are not doing so with the intention of profiting from licensing of copyright. They may contribute in order to sell support (e.g. Red Hat) or to have the software support sale of other products (e.g.Intel).
Clearly it's a weakness of the project that the acceptance of contributions is not made conditional on the contributors not taking unilateral actions of this sort.
"Excepting that it'll be rolling across a kerb and dropping down; trolley jacks / petrol tanks are expensive."
It's not your car you move with the trolley jack, its those blocking you in. Extra points if you leave them somewhere that will need another trolley jack to get them out of.
"it's taken by phlebotomists, so it must be phleb they're taking"
I hope not. The "tom" is a bit of a clue that your phleb is being cut (The word atom was invented to name something that couldn't be cut any further) and a quick trip to whackypedia tells me that the phleb bit means blood vessels. I rather hope they don't take those.