"What happened to the first two parts?"
They died. After George IV it was considered wise to wait nearly a century before the next instalment.
42414 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Don't use the shutdown command."
I suppose it doesn't make as much difference as it used to do but when shutdown was first introduced it was a script. It enabled us to build in various extras such as inhibit new database connections during the grace period. Good luck doing that with halt.
"In my eyes, a 30 day uptime is a prime contributor to root cause"
If you think a 30 day uptime is a prime contributor to root cause I've got news for you. The prime contributor is some other problem, maybe a memory leak, that's slowly poisoning your system. Your reboot is just treating the symptom.
"How do you know when you're a real sysadmin? When, rather than a spurious pride that the machines have been up for a very long time"
If you're an old enough sysadmin you can remember when patches arrived at very infrequent intervals. Personally I can remember a machine which we really didn't ever want to reboot as we weren't convinced its disks would restart. That had an uptime of years.
"If Brexit is a mega-programme, where’s it happening and why haven’t we heard about it?"
Like all other consequences of Brexit it will only become visible on Brexit day. Or, in this case, some time after because it takes some time to work out the requirements. IoW, don't put off any long contracts for something else; you'll have time to do those and come back to get on the gravy train although by that time the gravy will be little more than boiled water.
"I get hardly any spam at all"
I used to get quite a lot of spam to my Hotmail address, largely because of it being exposed on Usenet. Very little gets through now - Microsoft filtering has improved vastly over the last year or so. Occasionally SEO spam gets through - disappointingly little as I like to bait them now and again. Emails threatening suspension of the Hotmail account seemed to get through the filters occasionally although you'd have thought these would be the easiest to filter - does it pretend to come from us? yes, did we send it? no = spam. There was the occasional less well-informed spammer threatening to cut off my Gmail or Yahoo account but they all seem to be gone now.
"Unfortunately, ... the most popular supported programs on Wine are games."
This, I found, was the problem. They concentrated on performance for gaming at the expense of H/W portability. In particular they deliberately assumed display drivers reporting 24-bit pixels would handle 32-bit because they preferred word alignment. It led to a lot of bug reports where applications would crash on commodity H/W with Intel video.
As they regarded it as a feature the reports went unaddressed which didn't stop them sending out automated emails when new versions were released asking if it had been fixed yet. I kept recompiling new versions with a simple patch until (a) I got fed up, (b) the application I was interested in stopped using a 32-bit splash screen which was the only bit that caused the crash.
"I think the public would expect us to be thinking about how we can use that technology"
Yes, innocent members of the public would expect the Met police to use a technology that might wrongly identify them as being wanted. Especially when the force is under the command of someone who has form for running an operation that ended in the shooting of an innocent man wrongly identified as being wanted, an event one would reasonably have expected to have been the end of her career.
Whoever thought it would be a good idea to promote her to a position which requires the trust of the community?
"If the older generation present a handicap to companies like IBM, it might be that they do indeed recognise the mountain of bullshit, and are torn between the need to bring in the cash, no matter how dishonestly, and the old-fashioned idea that you should, in fact, actually help your customers."
I was with you up to this point. However, the guy was a salesman and thus a front-line pusher of said bullshit. That wouldn't be a handicap to IBM.
"Since he's engaged lawyers he's already spending whatever resources he has"
They could be no-win, no-fee lawyers who scent a big win.
"Personally I would have made taken the package and let my partners know of some newly found availability. After 25 successful years in sales he must have made some contacts."
True but a good damages payment in addition wouldn't come amiss, it might even allow him to buy his way into such partners' business.
"So that would be an algorithm, artificial intelligence, a machine - not a person."
And what does Sample Application then do with the data? Sell it on? Use it as a basis for spear-phishing? Although the article says there's no evidence this has happened what we should be more interested in is the absence of evidence that it hasn't. Yes, I know finding evidence to prove a negative can be difficult or impossible but if companies want to be trusted simply saying they don't know something bad hasn't happened isn't really going to cut it.
Maybe if data leaks were treated like H&S, where corporate and individual criminal responsibility is assigned and poor performance can result in losing your house and going to jail, then we'd see companies take it seriously.
From the Data Protection Act 2018:
"198
Liability of directors etc
(1) Subsection (2) applies where—
(a) an offence under this Act has been committed by a body corporate, and
(b) it is proved to have been committed with the consent or connivance of
or to be attributable to neglect on the part of—
(i) a director, manager, secretary or similar officer of the body
corporate, or
(ii) a person who was purporting to act in such a capacity.
(2) The director, manager, secretary, officer or person, as well as the body
corporate, is guilty of the offence and liable to be proceeded against and
punished accordingly."
"I still do not see how they (UK authorities etc) can keep on failing at this simple stuff."
I don't know about the authorities but in TPP's case I can see quite easily how they do that. A few weeks ago I reported here seeing a recruitment poster "Write code/solve problems/save lives No experience needed". It was recruiting for TPP.
And TPP don't believe in providing first line of support for users; that's delegated to your GP's receptionist who is, of course, fully trained as first line IT support as well as being a receptionist.
I read this report on the Beeb a few hours ago. Unlike el Reg they didn't say who was responsible at the top of the report but I'd guessed who it was before I got that far.
We have to keep saying, cloud's not really anything special, it's just somebody else's computer you can't control. But if it gets sold to CxO* types as a panacea there's little chance of getting this through to them except by experience.
* In absence of evidence to the contrary assume O stands for Orifice and you won't go too far wrong.
" you walk away and present the boss with a cost/benefit comparison of cloud vs self hosting, don't you?"
And probably get ignored by the beancounters. Although in this particular case if it had been a beancounter's decision getting the CFO out of bed to deal with it on his credit card would have been well justified.
"But I don't get it how you can bet your house on a free service that is clearly not meant for such use."
Given that there was a demand for a credit card it doesn't seem likely that a free service was used. In fact, IIRC, the quote in the article about AWS handling billing issues better came from the complainant and not a commenter, again pointing to the fact that it was a paid-for service.
"Why else would he confess his attempted crime to the police? He could just as well have gone to an E.R. and make something up about his injuries."
Maybe he hadn't the wit to invent a good story (having his foot explode might have rattled what wits he had), reckoned ER would call the police anyway and found the cop shop was closer so he might as well settle for a short hobble and a longer ride.