Re: "I can understand why he wanted to maintain uptime on the mail server,"
It's a colour that can be spelled either way
42400 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
A client had a Unix system uptime running into years. Not for bragging rights but because they'd heard rumours of the disk drives not reliably restarting and it had a lot of drives (single digit Gb sized drives. There was a lot of worrying when it had to be moved - just to the other end of the building. Given that every drive in the database was double duplicated it shouldn't really have been so much of a worry but it caused considerable angst in the lead-up to the move - which went without a hitch.
"To turn them is going to take something pretty cosmic, something so bad that it would threaten the companies very existence. And I am not talking about the malware groups - this would be something that Microsoft did to them."
Don't discount the malware groups and don't also discount that their effects, on further analysis, can be partly seen as something Microsoft did do to the victims.
There was a story on the Beeb site the other week about a reasonable-sized UK haulage firm - one whose name I recognised from seeing their fleet on the road - that was taken out of existence by malware and we have seen several large UK businesses severely hit this year.
It's not inconceivable that a few board members of some of these companies take a bit of time to reflect over Christmas and come back in the new year asking "How did this happen to us?" and really start digging. They then discover that being anything through and through is a bad idea. They discover that "Enterprise versions and all the active directory, policy settings etc controls that come with it" didn't prevent what happened. At that point some of their senior IT professionals are going to get asked some questions as to what they're going to do about it and if they don't come up with convincing answers (more of the same won't be convincing) the questions will get put to other IT professionals who can answer them.
How many high profile migrations by high profile victims does it take before a few other boards decide the time to go is before they get hit?
It will come as quite a shock to my cousin-in-law, long retired hairdresser and 90 in a few days time, to discover that she's a techno-geek. She's been using Zorin since some (fortunately incompetent) ransomware in an email she thought was from someone she knew hit her W7 computer years ago.
OTOH a friend of mine, almost the same age, runs W11 and has some sort of support arrangement with a Windows specialising techno-geek to sort out her problems.
Your "brutal truth" is BS.
"My advice to contractors that feel a bit sour about being let go is don't let it get to you"
I'd go a bit further than that. Remember that what the client is paying for includes flexibility. Your USP over a permie is that you let the client manager smooth over the conflicting peaks and troughs of demand and the peaks and troughs of staff availability and part of that is being easy to let go, something that you're actually charging for in your hourly or daily rate.
However in this case it seems like he got fired rather than let go which is pretty unprofessional in itself. Not temperamentally suited to the job I'd have thought.
"Customers that Microsoft could no longer serve would have the option to migrate workloads"
Is there anything in the MoU that would protect that option being trumped by a fiat from the US? Is there anything which would protect the contents of the customer cloud being copied to some USG server on receipt of a National Security Letter or frm being deleted with no notice?
"it is untenable for safety software to stop working if an infotainment system glitches, and so are exploring in-vehicle hypervisors to isolate different workloads"
The most effective way of preventing the infotainment system from stopping "safety" software working would be to isolate it with its own processor and nothing more in common with the rest of the vehicle than its power supply. The alternative proposed here is to build a SPoF.
Given the quality of the alleged "safety" S/W the best use of resources would be to concentrate on building some sanity into it.
"Someone else will always ask questions about things you may not have thought"
I used to be a tutor/counsellor for the science foundation course in the Open University. The best question I was asked (not at all difficult to come up with an answer on the spot) was from a student who was a science teacher* "Why do I have to use this balance** when I have a digital balance in school?" The answer, of course, was about measurement in science in general and the ability to be able to identify the reference standard on which the measurement depended.
* It was standard experience in the OU that the staff were younger than the pupils and there were a lot of teachers who didn't have degrees in their subjects.
** It was fairly primitive.
"Earlier this year, German-speaking user group DSAG said that if users eventually wanted to get back on the upgrade path with SAP, they would find that they had lost commercial leverage."
Really? Do SAP not employ salesdroids who will offer just about anything to get a sale? If not they must be very unusual.
Every week SWMBO sends out a PDF handout for her patchwork class. The class members need to print it out, or at least the last sheet. Why? Because the templates are on the last sheet (sometimes on the last several sheets) and they need to cut those out. Not everything can be just read.