Re: walking directions
" just keeping the (Twinkle free) Post Office Tower to my right as I walked"
Too many pubs and you just find yourself orbiting the tower.
42414 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"If lost in a forest go always down. You will reach a stream or gully and leave the forest along it. Going up will inevitably end on a hilltop."
It depends on the local terrain. In some places if you follow a stream you'll end up stuck in some form of mire. If it's not mountainous stick to the ridge and follow that down*. A lot of pre-historic tracks were ridgeways for good reason.
*Unless the ridge ends in a sharp drop.
"Taylor's, the Yorkshire Tea people, have a blend especially for hard water."
The local supermarkets sell it. Fair enough - we're in Yorkshire. But the water's so soft it defurred a kettle in a few weeks after we moved up from High Wycombe. Clearly too many people don't know the difference.
....The end of the page also states: "Comments, Webshells and shellcode are welcome."
Despite the issue being widely pointed out on social media, her team is either unaware or unable to fix the problem.
Why would they? They probably think it makes them look really knowledgeable. Sort of like hashtags.
"Keep in mind IBM back then was one of the largest international companies"
If IBM were that infallible how do you explain the special cable that had to be made to join the header to the 9-pin D connector on an AT serial port? Somebody in this mighty international company didn't even know that the numbering convention of a header is different to that of a D connector and nobody reviewed the design to fix it.
"The Z8000 was late and a disaster compared to 68000."
It worked OK. My first Unix box was a Z8000 Onyx although what was sold was a bit tightly configured. We had to by another half meg of memory and a 40 meg disk for the database. Moved on from there to a trio of Zilog boxes.
"DOS pretty much was a clone of CP/M86, which was barely more than a translation of CP/M 80."
I thought QDOS which became MSDSOE was written because Digital Research were dragging their feet over CP/M-86.
"Or maybe IBM already had by then a large international customers base, and knew more about different keyboard layouts than a bunch of engineers in some US uni who believed the whole world began and ended there."
Very likely but what's that got to do with the price of fish? I think AT&T, the guys who gave the world the word "octothorpe", would have known a bit about keyboard layouts, especially for their system which was signed off internally on the basis that it was going to be word-processing documentation.
"Move/mv protects you from your errors."
Not entirely. I had a similar experience with mv. I was left with a running shell so could cd through the remains of the file system end list files with echo * but not repair it..
Although we had the CDs (SCO) to reboot the system required a specific driver which wasn't included on the CDs and hadn't been provided by the vendor. It took most of a day before they emailed the correct driver to put on a floppy before I could reboot. After that it only took a few minutes to put everything back in place.
A plasma beam requires both energy and material. The energy can be replenished from solar panels but the material will be exhausted. An alternative would be a laser pointed at the junk which then provides the material itself by evaporation. Of course the manoeuvring fuel will get exhausted anyway.
"So, to keep slowing it down your plasma throwing satellite will have to follow it for a short while"
The article suggests the impulse being applied for less than half a minute. Given that the device uses a balancing plasma beam suggests that the designers don't see a need to follow the target over this period of time.
"Well, GDPR has certainly put the cat among the infosec pigeons now! This gigantic, eye-watering fine will devastate the £12 Bn[1] annual turnover firm and cause a revolution in security throughout the country."
Go back and read the article. Notice the bit that says "June last year". Compare that with the date GDPR became operative. Note that it's earlier so the old rules apply under which the maximum fine was £500,000. At 2% of annual turnover the maximum fine would have been nearly 500 times larger form a £12bn under GDPR.
Go back to the article again and notice the bit that says that they turned themselves in. That automatically exempts them from a maximum fine - if it didn't work that way there'd be no incentive for anyone to do that.
"On second thoughts, it's easier to change banks."
I was with you up to this point - sort of. But the real problem is that they've dead-heated in the race to the bottom so none of them are worth changing to. But the reason I was only partly with you is the increasing difficulty of getting cash. There are no banks or building societies in my preferred location since YBS closed their branch. Elsewhere they're getting thinner on the ground.
Hence my post at the top of the list: the Treasury Committee need to force the bar stewards to provide a service. Imagine of one of them was put on a rolling 3 months notice to pull their socks up or lose their license.
"those backwards organisations like insurance companies that insist on paying with cheques."
Also those backwards organisations like HMRC if you don't want to waste time with their online ID stuff. SWMBO occasionally has to write out checks. She runs classes in a community centre where there's nobody to take her money and she certainly isn't going to send cash through the post.
"a hundred grand or more in their current account"
That explains it. Only about £90k and mostly in deposit. But that was Lloyds/TSB's attitude. It was a few years ago now so you might have expected the limit to have been less then. Anyway, I took their hint and did sod off; they'd already closed my preferred branch..
"Then there's the older folks to whom computers, while fun and great for communications, planning vacations, etc. don't have a clue either."
If they're sitting behind an ISP supplied router then it ought to have been supplied with RDP and anything else they don't need already blocked. So prime targets for this message are the vendors and ISP techies responsible for specifying requirements to the vendors and checking they've been met.
A secondary problem here would be visiting children and grandchildren who want to open up a port for some other purpose and think they know what they're doing. Perhaps ISPs should run occasional pro-active scans for open ports.
"local attacker can exploit this vulnerability via a SUID-root binary and obtain full root privileges,"
I find this a little odd unless the exploit can only be run from the console. I suspect they mean it needs command line access but that can be achieved via ssh.
OTOH kudos for the anagram name.
"Afterwards the letters were checked, and they had indeed be opened"
This bit was shown in "The man who never was".
Miles Malleson playing the boffin was given the envelope. "This has been in water...." snips a piece off, puts it in a test tube, adds water, gives it a shake, adds silver nitrate and gets a white precipitate "...seawater.". "But had it been opened?" (Dismissively) "Of course."
"More to the point why did the last buyer of Maplin (or their expert accountants and advisers) fail to see they were being stiffed?"
AIUI they were making a loan to Maplin with high interest rates (presumably financed at much lower interest rates). Providing they got the money back as "interest" it wouldn't really matter to them that the firm went bankrupt. I take it that "interest" was a more tax-efficient way of getting money out of the business than "profits".
"And as Tom 38 answered, cheap credit wasn't the cause, inappropriate lending was. Mortgages being given to people who were at very high risk of not paying them back"
And the whole house price bubble which powered this was driven by cheap credit. Various govts., including HMG, were addicted to low interest rates. We had the utter stupidity of Brown setting BoE the task of setting interest rates to control a measure of inflation which excluded housing costs. As a lot of the prices contributing to that measure were of products whose manufacture was being outsourced to China etc. those elements were falling, measured inflation was low and interest rates were low. Low interest rates drove up house prices and people were remortgaging on the basis of their inflated house prices just to get their hands on "cheap" money.
Forget the risk of not paying the mortgage back. If the punter can't do that the lender takes the house and sells it to recoup. It produces a housing crisis but not a financial one. What really does the damage is if the house is no longer worth what was lent on it. If the house prices are overinflated when the loan is made it doesn't take that many repossessions to deflate them so the lenders can't get their money back.
Way before the crash it was clearly unsustainable to anyone who gave a thought to it. Unfortunately there were too many involved who weren't inclined to give a though to it
And we stll have a housing bubble.
"So yeah, cheap credit anticipating house price rises was the cause, but between the end of the world and stuffing the banks full of cheap credit, we choose the latter."
And we've still got a house price bubble. Burst that and there are a lot of banks holding deeds to houses that are then worth less than the outstanding mortgages. As the A/C said, the [root] cause was cheap credit so why is cheap credit the answer?
"I mean someone working for Intel who gets a Linus blast might trot to HR for a chat about people being mean to them and that has implications for a corporate sponsor."
Someone driving a white van might get a blast from another road-user. What happens if they then go along to HR? They get told the bystander isn't an employee under control of of HR so they just have to lump it.
As Linus doesn't work for their employer he can't write their annual review, get them fired or get their bonus withheld for poor work. All he can do is blast them. They should consider themselves lucky.
From the GPLv2:
1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you receive it....
2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1...
AFAICS any contributor's code has been copied and incorporated into a derivative work as per these two sections. Having granted the permission to copy and modify it's difficult to see how any contributor's code can be ungranted. Although the license doesn't include any provision for forbidding this it certainly doesn;t make a provision for allowing it either. The nearest thing is
8. If the distribution and/or use of the Program is restricted in certain countries...the original copyright holder who places the Program under this License may add an explicit geographical distribution limitation...
which isn't the same thing.