Posts by Doctor Syntax

Self-driving cars doomed to be bullied by pedestrians

Re: Non-issue.

"the tourist wait for the green man, the local cross if there is no traffic."

SWMBO waits anyway, even in the face of evidence that the green man cycle has been omitted.

Re: meek cars and commuting

"This raises another question: will these cars stop for dogs? cats? squirrels?"

What about pheasants? They operate in two modes, dumb and equally dumb. First mode is to wander along the road ignoring anything that moves. The other is to whiz across in flight but at low altitude, equally oblivious.

Re: Warning! Warning!

'Um, the more correct term would be "Meat-space Driver."'

No, the meat space going to be out there. Dead meat.

Re: Hoodies playing chicken...?

"kept moving slowly forward"

Stop a few yards clear. Put evil grin on face. Ostentatiously check seatbelt's tightness. Rev engine....

Re: Wait a minute...

"it will be fun to see how many driverless cars you can collect on a country road."

Round here, where the country roads are steep, part of the cyclists' idea of fun seems to be charging at top speed down twisting lanes in the middle of the road. And no amount of braking by autonomous cars is going to avoid a collision with a cyclist who's already contributing most of the closing speed.

Hell desk thought PC fire report was a first-day-on-the-job prank

Re: Tossing water at electric fire

"Presumably this is to keep someone in a job whose sole ability is being able to recognise a fire extinguisher."

It might be a good idea if that someone has the additional ability to recognise the correct fire extinguisher for the situation.

Topless in-car selfie attempt climaxes with rear-end bonking

Re: Police posting her picture online is an infamy

"actually my mom once backed into a police car."

A policeman once reversed into the side of my car once. Windows covered in frost, reversing out of drive...

Search engine results increasingly poisoned with malicious links

"It could be the ads on the website that have been flagged as suspicious by us and that changes every time you access the site," Morgenstern explained. "Or the website is delivering different content randomly or it does so by checking the user agent or location of the user.

Having found a suspicious link they didn't test further?

Re: If I visited dodgy sites...

"Then you find out that the malware is capable of infecting hardware, persisting across reboots, infecting other machines on your network AND escaping VMs to attack machines there."

Do you?

Citation needed. Citation should specifically address BSD as the live OS as that was specified by the OP.

Irish activists fight EU-US privacy pact as tech giants flock to sign up

"a widely-expected moved"

The only surprise is that it took so long.

Lenovo downward dogs with Yoga BIOS update supporting Linux installs

Re: Microsoft..

"UK's Equality Act 2010...seen as illegal under UK disability law, but for some reason Microsoft have got off Scot-free."

I'm not sure how this particular law is enforced but I'd expect that either a complaint has to be made to some official body or a complainant has to raise it in court themselves. If nobody did so that might be the reason.

" -100 points for trying to pull the stunt in the first place."

It's not as if this was the first time they've faced public criticism for pulling firmware/crapware stunts. I wonder how long it's going to take for the penny to drop. They're certainly not on my list of people I'll buy from.

"as soon as money was involved"

Money often has effects like that. Nice one.

Web devs want to make the Internet of S**t worse. Much worse

"life expectancies under 50"

Increased profits by mixing foodstuffs with non-nutritive and sometimes toxic adulterants was a desired result of Victorian grocers.

Ready access to water was a desired result of a public pump in the middle of Soho.

Brightly coloured walls were the desired result of arsenic-based pigments in wall-paper.

Eliminating these and other desired results during the course of over a century and a half is what's lifted life expectancies over 50.

"China has sovereignty"

Yes it does. In China. UK, the EU, the US, the UNameit aren't China. Our own governments have their own sovereignty to set regulations on what can be legally sold in their own jurisdictions. Regulation is the first step to actually dealing with gray markets.

Re: Security First

"Security first can ONLY come if a Machiavellian Prince with some scruples takes over the world and demands it with extreme penalties for noncompliance. Otherwise, sovereignty, competition, and overall human stupidity will ensure it'll never happen."

Nope. There's nothing Machiavellian about all the existing regulation that ensures that it's illegal to sell vehicles that fail adequate safety standards, children's toys with lead paint, electrical items without adequate insulation etc.

It simply required legislators to see the need for them and use their sovereignty to require stuff sold in their own market places to be safe. They'll get the message here as well. It might take them longer because the TLAs have vested interests. Also it won't stop the Del-boys trying to get round regulation but that's what Trading Standards are there fore. Eventually the mainstream market will supply devices with adequate security.

You might reasonably reply that the rise of market places such as eBay makes it possible for the Del-boys to sell non-conforming items. Yes it will; it also makes it possible for other safety regulation to be by-passed. It's another thing for legislation to catch up with. It's not an entirely separate issue but it's one which will get tackled in due course.

Re: Of course Mozilla will implement it

"They have a tack record of implementing and backing every bad idea."

Nice Freudian slip there, Christian. Tack as in tacky. Spot on.

Re: Wrong

"Straight away you assume that Bluetooth is being used for applications"

I did nothing alike. Not that assuming it would have been wrong. Just sayin'.

"Ok...so with all the current insecurities doing the rounds, opening up an attack vector that crosses strewn with malware web"

Over your head. My whole point was that with some or most Bluetooth access potentially moved to the browser the overall attack surface will be reduced, because now you won't need to download and install native apps permanently anymore for a lot of Bluetooth-related stuff, but can simply run them on-demand from the much safer browser environment.

So the second bit I've emphasised is saying that with Bluetooth in the browser you won't need to download the apps that, in the first bit I've emphasised, you're denying were being used without Bluetooth in the browser? Somehow I don't think you've got your own head round your own arguments. Maybe that's why the rest of us have problems with them.

Re: If this takes off

"I genuinely think they have been trained by companies and the world around them that this is the new normal, and us older buggers are just paranoid."

It's simply the old "experience is a dear teacher but there are those who will learn by no other". They'll learn. They'll also discover the truth of the complementary saying: "experience is something you need just before you get it".

Dan Kaminsky calls for a few good hackers to secure the web

"And if we can make it so that you have to prove ownership of the private key (by signing some kind of nonce value) for the domain you CLAIM to be sending FROM"

I'm not sure about claiming a private key for the domain but a private key for the actual user ID is a different matter. That would be right here on my own device*.

Oh dear. That makes webmail a bit of a problem doesn't it; yet another example of security being sacrificed to convenience. That sacrifice is, of course, one of the main sources of our problems. As insecurity brings inconvenience we should gradually see a rebalancing act sometime.

*Yes I know. The device might be pwned. But the pwning is so often by faked emails that there's a vicious circle that needs to be broken. Do you have any alternative suggestions? Standing there just pissing on everyone else's ideas without having any of your own is such an unattractive pose.

Let's praise Surface, not bury it

Re: "Richer apps"

Richer mugs to flog stuff to.

Re: Bah!

"I enjoy living vicariously through others' experience of installing Linux on laptops."

So, here's my little MSI laptop, bought a few years ago for the express use of doing things, namely being taken into libraries and archives for doing research. Download Mint, burn onto disk. Plug USB disk drive into said laptop, insert disk into drive. Start computer, press function key for boot menu and select boot from USB. Mint disk fires up. Select options appropriate to language and time zone. Wait for installer to do its thing. Remove USB drive and reboot.

I hope you enjoyed that vicarious experience.

"I don't enjoy the litany of all the things that won't work properly without hours of fucking about under the bonnet."

Neither do I which is a good reason for not doing them as in the above.

"I need a computer as a tool for helping me do other things, interesting things, not as an end in itself."

And so do I. That little device is still doing exactly that research recording task. It's also a nice little laptop to take when going on holiday - although it works better when I don't do what I did this week: forget to pack the charger!

Re: Bah!

"And to that same foetus who will whine at me about Linux: If I could buy an off-the-shelf machine with the features I want and Linux installed I would have done so twelve months ago."

You youngsters* seem to need someone to wipe your noses all the time.

Buy your favoured drive-less laptop. Download an install image of a Linux distro and copy it to a USB thumb-drive Plug thumb-drive into laptop, blow away the eyeturd (you will find no disagreement from me on your points 1 & 2) and install Linux for yourself. Unless you consider a laptop and a USB stick to be "parts" (you bought such parts in 1993?) no buying of parts is required.

*You claim to be still commuting. That implies you're of working age therefore you're a youngster from my PoV.

"The PC is dying, but better, richer apps might just save it"

Translation:

PCs are failing to die at anything like the required rate so we're not able to sell as many replacements as we used to. We need some massively inefficiently coded applications that can't be run on existing kit to force users to upgrade.

HMRC to create new compliance team focused on 'gig economy' workers

If services are being provided on a business footing the business should, if being well-run, aim to build up a buffer to continue paying the staff, be it one worker or many, for a period when there's no custom. It should also be able to cover NI, pensions and other costs - including transport, phones etc where appropriate. It should be paying at least the statutory minimum levels. In order to make this a viable business the rate paid by the client should be larger than the statutory minimum level by some factor.

That factor might depend on the additional facilities required, such as a cycle and phone for a courier, but in principle that factor could be determined for a particular type of service. There's then a very simple test to apply: you pay less than that, you've got an employee and you handle PAYE, NI, accept that you are responsible for employment rights etc.

There's no reason why the gig economy terms shouldn't be available for businesses that require that flexibility of labour but it should be clearly recognised that the gig worker is taking on the business risk that the engager wants to avoid but should be paid accordingly and taxed as a business.

Re: Nationalise the lot of 'em

You have to extend that to redundancy etc as well. Depending on the party ruling at the time the state might be very keen on handling all the pensions (not that they've been brilliant at that), parental leave of course. But they're not going to handle the costs of companies adjusting the size of the workforce to changing requirements.

"It's a company whose sole business consists of selling somebody's personal services."

Which, of course, is exactly what the big consultancies do. The difference is scale and hence the ability to fund lawyers against HMRC.

Re: IR35, is currently costing the taxpayer around £440m a year

"But if HMRC really have ignored how the contract "actually works", you'll be able to convince a judge and he'll chuck it out. Been there; done that. Although I only won on appeal."

You may have been lucky. Back in the day when i had to take an interest in such things there were some perverse decisions reported.

Divide the internet into compartments to save us from the IoT fail whale

Re: There's a germ of an idea here...

"Just a thought, please feel free to tear it to shreds."

How does the ISP know which request came from an IoThingy and which from a user? Assuming, here, an IPv4 network with everything arriving at the ISP bearing just the router's address.

These edge connectors. Where does he propose to put them? At the interface between the individual customer sites and the ISP? If so we already have such things there, they're the customer routers and in some cases they are the bots in the botnets. So his first problem is to produce a more secure router/edge connector that can be safely put in that place. And when the security holes start to become apparent in those, then maybe we need a more secure edge connector in from of them.

HMRC IT boss quit £185k job for more cash

Re: Golden Handcuffs ??

"no competition clauses to avoid anyone jumping ship to other companies competing in the same space"

Governments tend to treat taxation as a monopoly*. There are no companies competing with HMRC, at least not within the UK.

*Note that they don't achieve this when it comes to taxation of multi-national companies.

Good luck securing 'things' when users assume 'stuff just works'

Re: How about what BT/VM do?

"Plus it doesn't help if the manufacturer is on razor-thin margins such that 2-3 cents per devices pivots it into unprofitable."

Which is why some of us keep saying the solution is to make such security provisions mandatory. You want to sell your stuff here? This is what you have to do.

To some extent it levels the playing field - those costs are common to all products. And for manufacturers who can't afford that, maybe they're best kept out of the market. If they were selling cars would you consider it acceptable to omit bakes to enable them to compete on price?

Re: "Nice to Have"

"if the standard involves effort (sliding the bolt on the door)"

Too late, there's probably a patent on that.

Internet of S**t things claims another scalp: DNS DDoS smashes StarHub

Re: sanitise customer kit

Percussive sanitisation.

Data ethics in IoT? Pff, you and your silly notions of privacy

Some people made their own decisions.

"not quite on the topic of “data ethics” the audience was led to believe. Some got up and left."

Cyber-crooks menacing hospitals are put under the microscope

Bingo

“Gaining the upper hand in cybersecurity requires a rejection of conventional paradigms in favor of radical new thinking. Where health care organizations have relied on old playbooks, they must be newly unpredictable. Where they have hoarded information, industry players must become more collaborative. Where they have undervalued cyber defense overall, they must prioritize it.”

Microsoft: We're hiking UK cloud prices 22%. Stop whining – it's the Brexit

Re: UK is doomed!!!

"And who needs Microsoft?"

Those who've already been sucked into Azure? Note how those who are more strongly locked in get a steeper price rise than those who might find it easier to move to Linux. Nevertheless this is still slicing the salami rather thickly.

"Another US conglomerate decides to hike its prices and everyone immediately blames the brexit voters, looking for a scapegoat."

Well, the article clearly says that it's currency related. If we're not to see this as Brexit related should we start referring to the sudden-but-entirely-coincidental-devaluation-of-the-pound?

Today the web was broken by countless hacked devices – your 60-second summary

"The devices come from China and are imported direct. Who gives a damn?"

Market traders if they're importing them when Trading Standards come calling.

ISPs when they're exposed to fines for routing non-compliant stuff. As I said in another post, there are multiple points to apply pressure to make stuff unsaleable.

Re: persuading

"it's not Happy Panda's problem, it's ours."

It's theirs if they can't sell their stuff. Contains full of instant land-fill being turned away at the docks? The message will get through PDQ.

"Finally - as to the suggestion of arresting USERS because they have insecure IoT kit - that's stupid, there is no way that could ever be proposed to be added to law"

That depends on how bad the problem becomes. There are several points to apply pressure.

One is the market place via the types of regulation and certification that's in place already for electrical safety etc. It gives Trading Standards or the like to deal with vendors in the country and for customs to turn away incoming shipments. There's absolutely nothing novel in principle about this, it's just that govts. need to be kicked into motion to get a round tuit.

Another is the ISPs and through them the users. They can be required to put it into T&Cs that non-compliant kit can't be exposed on the net, either outside of firewalls or via uPnP.

Finally, after due warning, the users themselves if they insist on connecting stuff it can be made an offence. In practice, of course, the ISP would almost certainly deal with it by cutting off the customer but having the illegality as back-up to deal with awkward customers.

All this combined would make non-compliant stuff unsaleable. That would lean on the manufacturers more effectively than trying to negotiate international standards.

That leaves countries that are reluctant to get round to doing such things. "Nice internet connection you have there. Shame if it got disconnected for an hour or two now and again. Or a day or two."

Re: The blacklist of things

"Then what happens when innocent users SUE for the collateral damage of them not being able to go on the Internet for no fault of their own?"

What happens? The ISPs learn the advantage of making sure it doesn't happen again. Or, to put it another way, they learn the cost of not having made sure it couldn't happen in the first place.

As per another of your posts, we;re dealing with Stupid here so we need to to take actions that don't depend on Stupid understanding things.

Re: Today the web was broken ...

"Believe me, it's only going to get worse"...

...before it gets better.

Re: Capt. Hindsight

"As long as you are happy to pay manufacturer to have support team that will be resetting these passwords 24/7. Are you ?"

The user sets those. The default password is on the label. You reset it to get that and you then have to set a new password before you can get it online.

You, the user, lost the label? Sorry, can't help you, we don't have a record of it.* You'll have to buy a new one. Please look after that better.

* That prevents anyone ringing up trying to get the default password if it transpires the pile of crap device can be reset remotely.

"DNS resolution is needed for a lot more than just the URL you typed into the browser or clicked in Google. Each of the secondary domains that site calls have to be resolved too, and there can be dozens of them on a fairly typical site on the internet."

To say nothing of the tertiary and quaternary domains. OTOH if this forced sites to serve all their own crap this could be seen as a useful by-product

"The problem as ever will be no company having the balls to do this."

Turn that one round. As one of Nixon's henchmen said, when you have them by the balls their hearts and minds will follow.

Require them to do this.

Re: Home Router Traffic

"Also, to all the standards-talkers, persuade China first, discuss afterwards."

No, require stuff legally on sale and/or in use to meet standards and China will be persuaded.

Re: Standards Bodies need notice

"There is solution but it's not even remotely close to what you're rallying for."

I haven't seen you suggest it.

Re: Standards Bodies need notice

"Do you really want to live in communist utopia where government can control which device you can use to connect to Internet ?"

I didn't see that being suggested. It's not a matter of controlling which device, it's a matter of controlling the safety standards they meet. They'll already by subject to all sorts of safety requirements. For instance the telecoms network operators will already have specs as to what can be connected to ensure it doesn't put harmful voltages on the line or draw excess current. Or are your telecoms providers communist-run?

Re: Standards Bodies need notice

"I just wonder if you notice subtle difference between $30K car and $50 electronic device and how differently both industries regulated."

Your $50 electronic device should already be regulated as regards electrical safety.