Re: "100,000 Genomes Project is secure, insists chair"...
"Which regular commentard am I?"
I don't think you're Bob. One down....
42530 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Unless you were urging MS only outfits to decay and atrophy and shrink. Which I suppose works, too."
It's a very good interpretation, especially as they were his former former employer. It would be a good reason to move them from current to former status and get out ahead of the crowd.
"users do matter and will either not stay, complain or hate a design if they can't get what they want easily and fast."
The thing that most effectively causes me to not stay is a page that displays nothing at all or a list of URLs it wants Javascript from. If it doesn't work reasonably with NoScript in action then as far as I'm concerned it's a dead loss.
Step 1. Start rumours that the govt is spying on the public's $stuff, e.g. turning on everyone's Echoes etc.
Step 2. Govt starts taking serious public heat and discovered it's been courageous (as in Yes Minister).
Step 3. Govt appeals to telecoms companies to deny the existence of such TCNs
Step 4. Telecoms companies point out they have to keep shtum about TCNs and can't possibly confirm or deny they exist.
Step 5. What was that about an election?
"May can then tell ERG that look all your talking about amazing deals with Europe - well this is best you can get and shut up for a generation now."
Their view will be that they weren't in charge. Nothing other than utter failure with nobody else to hang the blame on will persuade them. Probably not even that; they'd just start finger pointing amongst themselves.
"confined to a European theatre of war"
I hate to break this shocking news to you but satellites go round the world*. Members of a constellation should be available at any longitude although the inclination of the orbit will determine the range of latitudes between which they're above the horizon.
* A Brexit satellite will be different. It will go round in ever-decreasing circles over the UK until it disappears up its own thruster.
"Road pricing can be done many ways, but if you are a moderately dim civil servant without much conception of how bloody devious the general public can be if money is involved, then a road pricing scheme involving Galileo looks like a really, really good idea."
You're getting close to my scheme for getting rid of traffic congestion.
1. Use road pricing technology to measure how much each vehicle was held up over the course of the year and price it.
2. Deduct from the sum raised by road taxation the amount actually spent improving the roads.
3. Deduct from the remainder the cost of congestion measured at step 1 and use it to compensate the drivers. If there isn't enough to cover it divvy up what is left on a pro rata basis.
4. What's left, if anything, goes into the Exchequer.
There'll be all manner of road works to reduce congestion over the next few years until some cash starts getting into the Treasury.
" I suppose I might have taken to copying the file and checking in the copy instead"
I might have written a script that did the check-in/check-out as a single command. That's assuming there wasn't an option - as per the comment on SCCS - in which case just get used to that as the normal way to do things.
"Why was a writeable fstab so fatal?"
I think what you've missed was that the revision control removed the file when checking in. That's why it had to be checked out again.
Checking out read only would be a side issue. It would mean that the revision control system wouldn't have the version locked and it would also mean that the running version couldn't get edited to a state inconsistent with the version the revision control system had marked current.
Since 2014 some of the cards will have expired so they'll be counting the originals and the replacements. Then there are customers with multiple cards. And some of the customers will have changed address or given a home address sometimes and a business address at others. Even if it's card plus address combinations rather than transactions there'll be a good deal of multiple counting of individuals going on.
"burning the CC's and going cash only. No checks either."
The way things are going it'll be impossible to get hold of cash, at least in the UK. You can't get cash from your now-closed bank branch and you'll need a card to get cash out of an ATM. And that assumes the ATM network survives.
It's high time retention of banking licences was tied to meeting standards of accessibility and customer service with the required standards being notched up each year.
"I would've hoped at least when GDPR came in, one of the things businesses would've spotted was that data is a liability"
You're quite right but it's not easy to break the habits of a lifetime. It doesn't help that for a lot of management bods the desire to hoard and exploit data is part of their personality; it's what got them into those roles. It's probably going to take a few fines on a scale prompted by intent to make an example of the a few miscreants before the message gets through. And then a few more top tier fines on a few businesses who try to cover up to get that message through as well.
"One quick twiddle later, and the laptop worked perfectly again.
Cue one embarrassed Director, and one smug IT support guy."
Embarrassing the Director isn't necessarily a good career move. Avoid it and give the impression that you've worked a miracle. There are a couple of alternatives. One would be to take it out of the room to work on it and wait at least 20 minutes before returning it with an exhausted look on your face. If you're not allowed to take it away do something distracting and technical-looking whilst nodding wisely such as bring up the command line and scroll through few directory listings while surreptitiously twiddling the volume.
Whilst on a contract as Unix/Database support and fixer I was just leaving for home one afternoon when the client's director buttonholed me because his PC wouldn't turn off - this was in the days of Win95 and software power-down was a new and not reliable thing. Leaned over, pulled mains plug out of back of PC & went home.
"You can google the locations of Amazon data centers, take a look at GDPR and maybe Caldicott Two and work out where the data will likely move. This is a groundless worry."
What precautions do they have to move stuff out of scope of the CLOUD Act and anything else the US Govt. will come up with when it can't get its own way?
"a sufficiently described inventive step"
The problem here seems to be the interpretation of those words by patent offices and courts. On the one hand "sufficiently" might be over-generously interpreted and on the other hand so might the inventiveness needed to implement it.
"Arguing about zero or one being the first of a sequence. Was this ever an issue before Computers?"
I got the calculation of BP to BC dates wrong in my program for the Belfast radiocarbon lab by not taking that into consideration. I'm not sure but I think the same error was probably made when they were done by hand. It was only really noticeable when one worked out to be 1950 BP* Oops.
* BP is Before Present. "Present" for radiocarbon dating purposes is 1950.