Posts by Doctor Syntax 40485 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Quite possibly the intent, but the early creators of the web were not photographers or others who earn their living by the creation of copyrighted works."
No, but those who do make their living in that way should take the time to understand how it works before they use it.
"Instead, he'll always be the person who, to all intents and purposes, sued a kid for using his photo that she cribbed from the net for a school project "
Maybe so - and incorrectly. According to the article he sued the school for publishing it on the net, not the child for using it in a project.
"However, there are a number of websites where when you hyperlink, if it detects an invalid "referrer" field in the URL request, it substitutes the image with a placeholder image telling you where to licence from."
I can't help thinking that this is directly contrary to the whole purpose of the web and HTTP. The whole idea as published was that if you provided a URL it was to enable people to link to it. What's the difference between someone slotting in a URL to your work and you taking someone else's work (TB-L's work in this case) and misusing it?
Try running a local history website. There are often a good few images of the locality, often originating in old post-cards which have been passed around, published in books with titles such as "Old Dunny on the Hill in Pictures" and nobody knows where they originated. Often they're from postcards but a local company publishing postcards in the 1920s has disappeared without trace.
"But he can get someone else to front one for him..."
From TFA (my emphasis) banned in July from directly or indirectly being involved. Getting someone to front for him becomes a criminal offence with time as a guest of HMQ as a distinct possibility. I suppose that would also apply to whoever did front for him if they did so knowingly.
I'm not saying he wouldn't do it but he would be heading into progressively deeper shit if he did.
"So the focus becomes almost entirely on things that are easy to measure."
That's by no means confined to teaching.
On the subject of measuring in general. I remember a long time ago an article in a motoring magazine about engine tuning. One approach was "if you can't measure it you don't have it". The other was "if you need to measure it you don't have it".
"They had 625 lines instead of 405. But required purchase of new TV and aerial."
The killer there was that UHF sets were on sale for a long time before VHF was turned off. That meant that there was a long time when the broadcasters were supporting two systems. The switch-over to digital was handled by having digital to analogue adapters available and also dual-standard receivers so that the analogue only sets could die a natural death without being unusable.
The TV analogy is also limited in application because on the whole in a household with multiple sets each one could go irretrievably TITSUP with out affecting the rest. But throw in a mixture of IPv4 printers in a domestic situation and the occasional box that absolutely has to run XP in a commercial situation and the TV analogy doesn't apply.
"It's impossible to do a completely seamless transition, because v4 is just not designed in a way that supports that,"
And given that there are several billion nodes out there on v4 don't be surprised that uptake of v6 isn't happening at all fast. As other comments have said, the time when the change should have been made was a long time ago. There are a huge number of people who have bought, or been sent by their ISP, a box, plugged it in and had everything just work because every single thing they have that connects to that box will use v4. Replace that new box for v6 and something will break - sod's law will ensure that. Nobody is going to want to handle all those support calls.
"I'm not sure why you mentioned NAT here, unless it was just simply because you misunderstood what NAT was doing for you."
I'd guess that what the OP was alluding to was that the NATed device can't be routed to so that anybody running round knocking on random IP addresses to see if they can find an open port won't be able to see such a device. If all addresses are routeable then that level of protection doesn't exist and you're left depending on the firewall; let's hope that that's properly configured at source and stays that way.
"The solution was to take IPV4 and make the packet size and address field larger"
The tricky bit of this is doing it in a way that lives with a lot of kit that doesn't know what to do with such a packet. There needs to be a way for your extended protocol to allow a node using it to be able to recognise that the node it's trying to talk to is plain old IPv4 only
"I remain amazed that the folks on here can't see the potential problems of these second class connections."
Nevertheless if you talk to those who are using such connections and tell them about their potential problems they'll look at you blankly and say "but it works".
"We're just saying that NAT is an unnecessary headache, that it breaks too much stuff and requires too many compromises, and that you should be avoiding it."
Millions of people are, however, running NAT and haven't even noticed that their stuff is broken.
"When IPv4 was under development during the 1970s, it must have seemed reasonable to specify 32-bit source and destination fields that dictate approximately 4.3 billion possible addresses."
And now that those 4.3 billion addresses are moe or less all allocated and, via NAT and CGNAT, over-allocated that's many billions of nodes, some with IPv4-only baked in via firmware which need to be migrated if you want an IPv6-only world. That's a seriously non-trivial task. And it's no good saying, as one commentard more or less did some time ago, if you don't understand hex you shouldn't be using it because most of the owners of those billions of nodes don't, never will and shouldn't need to.
Unless a scheme had been devised to seamlessly - let me go full Bob here: SEAMLESSLY - migrate those it was always going to end up like this.
Would it have been feasible to devise a protocol which accepted IPv4 as a fully accepted subset? I don't know, but if it would then anything else would have been a serious mistake.
"Because the stack layout of a function is determined at compile time, we can control what data will be overwritten when the overflow occurs, which gives us an opportunity to ensure the overflow will not be exploitable."
That assumes that what the compiler does with the source is predictable. Optimisation might affect that. Even if the result is what was intended it might not be after a new release of the compiler.
"The truth however is that ICANN continues to be baffled by the fact that the European court system has no interest in its corporate interests and refuses to be told that the Whois service is as important as ICANN considers it to be."
I think it's more of a case that ICANN isn't as important as it thinks itself to be.
"On the other, such moves would also hammer a stake into the corpse of the Vega+."
It depends. The IP would be one of the assets the administrators would want to realise cash on. If there's perceived to be a market for the device someone might be interested in buying it and goinf into production. Not that that would help those who've already paid.
"Customers who may have been impacted by this issue were notified."
Which customers are these? Salesforce's customers or the customers who had their misfortune to have their data spaffed to someone not entitled to have it? Are any of them in the EU and if so have the appropriate regulators been informed? What was that about 72 hours?
"some impatient woman ramming my car because we weren't moving, neither was the car in front, or the police offering stood in front of them!"
Years ago, in the queue for security checks leaving the ferry port at Larne the driver in the car behind was flashing lights and gesturing impatiently. I was strongly tempted to flash my official pass at the police checkpoint and suggest the driver behind was acting suspiciously.
I later wished I had as a means of getting retaliation in early. Many years later my wife worked in QC for an Anglo-Italian firm which had a plant in Larne and in retrospect the driver looked very like her then Italian boss. He didn't like some of the figures she produced about a batch of product and "adjusted" them. When it turned out the batch was indeed substandard it was she who got fired for producing an erroneous analysis.
"who all enjoy a decent, index linked final-salary pension"
People keep saying this. It's actually a smaller proportion of final salary than I encountered in the private sector. Every time HMG decided there should be a freeze on pay rises it was to their own staff they could apply that. Until I got out I had every expectation of retiring in penury.
"so you go to out of town superstore to shop instead as it has free parking"
The "free" parking is funded by letting it out to parking vultures who hand out fines to people who might only have driven through to drop off a passenger. And yet the chains who rent premises there don't seem to mind being treated as bait.
And yet both town centre and out-of-town venues wonder why they lose business to the net.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
