Re: Whatever they do, it will make sod all difference
"their ability to turn on their heel and walk straight into the road is remarkable."
And cyclists never do the equivalent of this?
42420 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Frankly I can't imagine why anyone would try to organise an international event in the USA nowadays."
Given the previous reports of problems getting travel to such events (maybe even to this one) in previous years I'm surprised they even chose the US this year.
"From the outside, it could look identical to a Yale-type lock"
Except for the need for an electrical supply. Even if it has no wires and no batteries the solar panel might be a clue.
The real problem with what's commonly meant by "Yale-type" locks* is a lock that takes a key on the outside and has a simple knob on the inside. It holds the door closed but if there's a glass panel near the lock, either in the door or beside it don't regard the door as locked. Just because a door looks locked it doesn't mean it is.
In the present context consider the screen saver. If the login requires 2FA because password isn't enough have you remembered to require 2FA to unlock the screen-saver? And have you then required the H/W device to be removed after login to prevent it being left in place when the screen-saver is in operation?
* Yale also make multi-lever deadlocks.
"Looking ahead, you'll get to worry about losing your physical hardware key rather than losing the secrecy protecting your passwords through a poorly secured server."
You'll also have to worry about the H/W key failing. You'll have to hope that the next computer, phone or whatever still has the slot that your key requires. It's not as if manufacturers would ever decide to eliminate connectors is it? And what happens when you're sitting on the end of a KVM switch with only a keyboard and mouse?
"Not sure you're getting the concept of risk."
I read that post as explaining - correctly - how the freelancing company manages the risk. The well managed freelancing company deals with the risk not by sharing it nor by insuring it (as you point out, that's not possible for the typical single consultant company) but by putting money aside to continue paying its employee when there are no billable hours, either by being sick, on holiday or being on the bench.
Right from the start or IR 35 this has been misunderstood. Primarolo described it as "treating their companies as money boxes". Well, a moneybox is where money's saved against a rainy day. It's the means by which the company stays solvent. It is good management.
In fact, I'd suggest it's a good test of whether the company is being run as a genuine company; if it's being managed prudently in this way it's the genuine article, if it's a direct conduit through which the money travels from client to worker scarcely touching the sides then IR35 might be appropriate.
There's also a corollary. If we add an expectation that the worker will be paid NMW or living wage and build up reserves then the rate must be some margin above that. If the client pays less than that then they have an employee. Not a deemed employee catching the rough from both sides. A genuine on the books employee, benefits such as holiday pay, sick pay, redundancy the lot paid by the client, PAYE handled by the client, employer's NI paid by the client.
From the engager's point of view they then can't get away with shoving off the provision of benefits and pay rock-bottom rates: either they have a company providing services at a reasonable rate or thay have an employee. In fact it was dealing with the sort of abuses that we see so much of now that was a paper-thin excuse for IR35.
Maybe it's time to investigate what the minimum number of people is to form a "company"*, set that up as a collective and proceed as before. From experience it also seriously cuts down on the costs of a better, collective liability insurance.
* Why the quotes. If it's registered at Companies House it's a company, if it isn't it isn't.
If you mean to be big enough to be outside the scope of IR35 ISTR that 20% holding of shares was the critical factor which implies a five person company but I'm not sure whether it was 20% or less or less than 20%. If some or all the shares were held by a spouse that would probably be considered a beneficial holding although there'd be scope for that being argued if the spouse were also providing billable time.
"they are all employing you, contract or not."
Not in this context. "Employ" has a specific meaning. It means that the person employed is an employee. Even if you start thinking in a more generic way such as "We employed a waterfall development approach" as soon as it's a person you're thinking about you're probably half way to coming to the narrow conclusion without even giving the matter due consideration. Worst of all, in any sort of tax investigation if you use the term in the loose sense to an inspector or a tribunal it'll be leapt on and taken literally.
To help you understand lets say ClientCo has 50 workers bodyshopped in by BigCo amd one worker bodyshopped in by LittleCo which he happens to own? Would you say the 50 are employed by ClientCo? Say the project was wound down and there's only one worker now bodyshopped inby BigCo; would you say they were employed by ClientCo? If BigCo's employee isn't employed by ClientCo why is LittleCo's employee?
"Broadly, IR35 reforms shift responsibility for determining tax status from the employee to the employer."
The entire basis of IR35 is determination of employment status. If you start by deciding that the client is an employer you've prejudged the whole thing.
Is it too much to ask that el Reg uses status-neutral terminology such as "engager"?
"Have you ever met service personnel?"
A few NCOs who were ex-IED displosal. Great guys.
Also been in a few situations where an armed escort was necessary.
OTOH my last week in forensic science started with 2 days flying over to Fort George to give evidence against a squaddie who'd broken into the NAAFI. They thought they were being considerate with the extra day but I could have done with that day in the office finishing off my writing up. It also reminded me that it's unwise to go drinking with Army sergeants, especially SIB.
I had one job where I was issued with a brand new top of range Orion*. Being of that cast f mind I ensured it was run in carefully and so on. Moving onto another company I had a Sierra. I took that in for servicing at the local Ford dealer and there was "my" old Orion with quite a deep V-shaped depression in the front. Some people just can't be trusted.
*Actually I was relieved of it sometime before I left. I had to swap it with some other staffer's Montego because they were afraid he was going to go over the contract mileage and they'd forgotten I also had a quite distant site to visit rarely. It might have been a coincidence that I left fairly soon after that swap. Comparison: Orion, nice car but the steering reaction did tend to have the spokes of the steering wheel try to take your thumbs off; Montego, little steering reaction at all, not even with the road. A later manager said he'd hired a turbo Montego and it put him in the ditch. A Montego with a turbo doesn't bear thinking about.
"It is curious how often rules intended to ensure funds are used responsibly and save money have perverse consequences."
The rule making mind assumes the rules will be applied along the lines that the rule-maker envisages. It never considers that the rules will simply be applied so as to achieve what the rule-follower needs to get done. And even that assumes the rules are actually followed.
"turntables that are just a motor and a platter"
They don't necessarily have to be priced into those figures but they do require a certain amount of solid engineering to ensure that they (a) revolve at a constant speed fairly similar to what it says on the tin, (b) don't have noisy bearings, (c) isolate vibration from the outside and (d) continue to do this after several years' use.
"4% of turnover sounds quite expensive."
And not acting when you discover the problem is the sort of action that gets pushed into the top tier. It's also possible that they're not a big enough company to be 4%ers. The flat rate can be a lot more than 4% for small businesses if it ever gets applied.
"Well if you can be a ferry company without any ferries then why can't you be an AI company without AI?"
There's such a thing as leasing. I wonder how many ferry companies actually running ferry services are without ferries on this basis. Quite a few, I suspect. Ditto airlines without aircraft.
I wonder if this is a successful ploy by the ERG made credible by Grayling's involvement. No, of course we won't need extra ferry sailings and extra ports to handle them; it's all going swimmingly.
"For the people who designed the system, registering is easy"
They are born administrators who horde, classify and can instantly lay their hands on any piece of paper they need. Archaeologists classify people according to their material culture. These people are the Chitty People.
"So what are my options?"
Refuse to do business with most of them. You don't need to set up an account if you walk into a shop to buy something. Why should you need to set up an account to make a one-off or occasional purchase online? Just set up accounts when it makes sense.
"Now who did the vendor get my number from?"
Possibly from another vendor (not necessarily on ebay) to whom you gave your number in the past. DHL the match it up with your address.
Given that delivery drivers frequently have problems reading a house name written in 6" high letters beside the gate I find it useful that that happens.
I don't know where you're based but here in the UK the current DPA, which enforces as much of GDPR as HMG decides it can't avoid, is actually the third (unless I missed one along the way). It tightens things up and increases penalties but the principles of data protection have been in place in legislation since the 1980s. I assume thinks are much the same for the older members of the EU and also for the new members but possibly with a shorter time-frame.
People really shouldn't don't have to engage in spycraft to stay in touch with their family though.
Just use the phone to talk to the family instead of using it as a burner to install FB. Famlies kept in touch before Facebook existed and they'll still be able to do so after it disappears from the face of the Earth - which will happen as soon as people realise they don't really need it.
"Well, as Windows fans will be well aware, 5.0 is ... the moment at which Microsoft abandoned such numbering for its server products. There is thankfully no sign of Torvalds adopting a similar approach with Linux."
I should think not. In the Unix world we're made of sterner stuff. 5.0 is quite a modest version number.
realising that companies marketing depts need want the age profile of their customers to operate
FTFY
The only thing they need a DoB for is if there's some need for an age verification. Even then "over 18" or whatever should be sufficient. Anyway, how are they going to verify the DoB supplied?
Perhaps a useful addition to KeepassX would be a DoB field alongside the other fields and a DoB generator to ensure that all DoBs supplied for a given user are unique.