"The tech lawsuit of the year"
So you don't think Schrems vs Facebook is going to come to trial this year?
42414 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"From fighting with BT to giving Google your emails"
I checked my address book for a local community group. About a dozen or more gmail, a couple or so BT and three or fourTalkTalk. No Microsoft brands at all. One of the TT ones also has a mac.com address. In fact both the known Mac users have TT addresses.
"Anyone who is unhappy with their current provider should take back control and switch to a better deal – you could get better service and save hundreds of pounds a year."
One thing that's probably keeping them locked in is that they're using ISP email addresses and it's just too difficult to change addresses, especially as they probably have it as the user ID on a lot of services.
It would be useful if Which advised against this.
"the wrong serial cable on a UPS"
I remember an odd instance with a serial-connected UPS on a SCO box. At some low level it must have tapped into the network stack because doing something - I can't remember what - on the network started what appeared to be a UPS-iinitiated count-down to power-off. It took a couple of repeats to be sure it wasn't the UPS.
"they should be red and not any other color"
Remember that some people are red/green colour-blind. Maybe that explains the green EPO button. Perhaps a distinctive shape would be a better distinguishing feature - and better to identify if the room's filling with smoke.
Yesterday we were in the local outpatients' department for SWMBO to attend a clinic. Today we got an automated patient survey with questions such as "would you recommend it?". What sort of answers do they expect? Yes, I'll tell all my friends to go there irrespective of whether they have that particular condition.
Unfortunately SWMBO picked up the phone. Had it been me I'd have logged it as a spam call to a TPO-registered phone.
"I expect there are a lot of people who can tell their grandchildren in future that they wanted the Euro currency in the UK."
I can and would tell them that now were they to ask. I think the long term result of this is that we'll be back in, tails between legs and the Euro as a requirement.
If avoiding the Euro was your objective I;d say battle won, war lost.
"If all EEC/EU-related votes had required even a 2/3 majority of those who voted (never mind 2/3 of the electorate) Europe would look very different today."
I'm with you on that. But having known that they were going to have to sell their product to a 2/3 majority those negotiating the Maastricht treaty would have had to come up with a different product. It's by no means certain that there wouldn't have been an approved treaty.
I mean, the SANE way to have started this 2 years ago, would be to simply (but loudly and publicly) kick off full prep for full independence/normal status (relabelled by one group as "no deal").
Yes, but the brayng hordes of Leave demanded Invoke Article 50 NOW; don't even ask Parliament, just do it.
This is the state the Leave campaign engendered. Leavers can scarcely complain now that things weren't done in a sensible order.
I'd go a bit further than that. The cross-party group should start by revoking A50 so we can go back and do things properly. The first step of doing things properly would be to to conduct a proper impact assessment on the economy. On the basis of that make a recommendation to the country of what the pros and cons are of the alternatives and then seek approval of that, either in the form of a general election or by a binding referendum conducted on a basis of requiring a supermajority for a change to the status quo.
"She really seems to have never understood anything about the EU, despite her years in the Home Office."
Despite? More like because of.
She'll have been through standard Home Sec brainwashing to regard Europe as a problem purely because of the ECJ and the ECHR although the latter isn't actually an EU institution. When she crashes us out of the EU she'll have achieved one of the goals the Home Office set her.
"Very true, but that wasn't applied to any of the votes to join or create the EU so it would be a little one-sided to only apply it now to the vote to leave."
I've always considered they should have been. But the economic situation we have is what it is. It makes it a pretty expensive gesture to try to change what should have happened in the past.
"and then call another referendum in 2 years because xx% disagreed with the result, and then another 2 after that ad infinitum?"
The way to deal with that is what should have been the original arrangement: a change of status quo needs a substantial majority, such as 2/3. To say nothing of the vote having been clearly stated to be binding.
There was no indication when if this will be put to commercial use.
Apart from any other consideration let's think what DNA contains: a sugar (the "-ose" at the end or "ribose" is a clue), some nitrogen and some phosphorus. A selection of some of the most important elements in metabolism. A single bacterium could multiply itself through your sugar-cube size DC in a few hours so you end up mostly decoding bacterial DBA to convert it back into bits.
"there should be no legal consequences of expressing an opinion"
Murdering people and broadcasting it isn't expressing an opinion. It's murdering people and broadcasting it. If you choose to rebroadcast it it's still not expressing an opinion, it's being an accessory after the fact. The victims' rights to life override the murderer's right to kill them - overwhelmingly as the latter doesn't exist - and hence your right to rebroadcast the occasion.