"Point is, they got away with it for a long time, and when they got caught"
The fines are only part of the costs. There will be long-term damage to their reputation. And damage to reputation can have severe effects as Mr Ratner could tell you.
33095 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"The move will also help boost Vodafone's image as a company that wants to stay in the UK, following its gaffe after the EU referendum when it hinted it might leave."
Looking back at that report it concerned the location of the HQ currently in London. The location of call centres to support local customers is a separate issue.
"A 256 terabyte memory limit isn't a concern for most end users."
OTOH Linux does run almost all the world's supercomputers. They might need it.
If you limit what an OS can do to what "most" end users need then you might not get much beyond Firefox OS. You might also conclude that 640K is enough for anybody.
"Doesn't help us in the UK much longer though..."
That depends on how much of an economy we want to have post-Brexit. ATM May isn't very much concerned about that but it's likely to become a straight fight between her and people who'd really like jobs in the future.
"Excel is useful for all sorts of things other than its intended purposes."
Sort of. But it the task it's bent to can rapidly grow to a point where it doesn't really work. Your single table database may be fine. Try to add what should be a second table and you have to denormalise it. The point where a real RDBMS would be the better tool is reached quite quickly.
OTOH I still haven't found a better tool than LibreOffice Calc for sorting out genealogical data, even if I keep threatening to write one myself.
"The dangerous ones are the ones that won't listen, the more so the higher up the chain they are"
The higher up the chain they are the more they're paid than you. And because they're paid more they must know better than you. Life is much simpler when you take this approach.
"Every so often I make sure that [an]individual... gets a copy of their Chrome browsing history sent to to both to their manager and to themselves"
At some point there's a risk that you'll be taken aside and have it pointed out to you that poking around in staff's computers without authorisation is a breach of security. This conversation is likely to take place somewhere between your desk and the pavement.
@Evil auditor
There's an alternative scenario that could bring about the same outcome. If the out-of-hours incentives were dropped there'd out-of-hours reports might get ignored until normal hours. The users would then learn to wait before reporting the issue.
The correct incentive structure, of course, is one that primarily measures and rewards fire prevention rather than fire fighting.
"In this case, I would want to to bill the misused CD to the training department, for failure to teach the general what the bits of a computer did."
On the whole I agree with you but maybe you missed the fact that the general had signed a waiver.
It's difficult if not impossible to deal with idiocy that's risen to the higher levels of an organisation. After all these are the people who should be exercising wisdom and laying down rules for the rest of the organisation. The first step of this should be understanding why those rules are needed and why they apply to themselves* as much as everyone else.
*It's doubly important that they follow their own rules. They need to set an example.
"You could argue it worked"
In the short term.
Look at the long term consequences. BT is now 12% owned by Deutsch Telekom and a complete take-over is a possibility. Ultimately the fixed line thinking dominated BT management's approach and they failed to see staying in mobile as a strategic necessity.
From O2's point of view it may have been welcome; the expression "Big BT" was a term of abuse around the Arlington.
"Now they can easily sell Openreach to the highest bidder and get rid of the headache."
Presumably by headache you mean the pension liability.
Or do you mean the necessity to find the money for those infrastructure investments?
In either case the headache would remain, it would just have been moved elsewhere and all the existing moaners would also just move their moaning elsewhere.
"I'm probably going to sound like a communist here, but it would probably be the best for the country as a whole for Openreach to go into 100% public ownership, owned by the government but operated as a separate commercial entity"
Some of us remember the mess that was from the first time round.
"As a result, unless TalkTalk reverses this decision I will suggest to my customers that this is a further example of bad decision making on TalkTalk's part and that they should consider changing ISP's when their current contract expires."
Seriously? You haven't suggested that already?
"paying for Internet access and then found I was getting Internet access minus one particular TCP port"
I discovered this years ago when TT took over Tiscali who'd taken over ...etc. and they decided to traffic shape Usenet to an extent which amounted to a block. I took appropriate action then. I really don't see why so many decide to stick with this serial abuser.
"thumb down...please explain..."
Not me but let me guess. Your inability/refusal to use your shift key?
Once upon a time we had teletypes which were single case. We got rid of that years ago which made it much easier to read stuff. Now we seem to be drifting back to that situation albeit with lower case rather than upper case.
"Remember the oath you must take before you testify: the truth, the WHOLE truth, and NOTHING BUT the truth. "
I always found this a little odd. In practice one can only respond to counsels' questions. One of the tricks of a cross-examiner is to ask a question which framed to call for a yes/no answer but which, for the whole truth, requires a more discursive answer - which the cross-examiner then tries to suppress. I've also been in the odd situation of being, in effect, cross-examined by the side that called me in an attempt to make me put a stronger construction on my evidence than I considered reasonable.
"And who is now having to deal with an unpredictable boss"
They probably deserve each other although I'd have expected his boss to have sacked him as untrustworthy by now. Maybe the only thing stopping him is the thought that finely tuned machines can't lose major components at quite that rate.