Re: Ooops.
"I think HPE over paid not due to any fraud but due to them just paying way to much"
Alternatively it was the CEO splashing the cash just to show what a big-shot CEO he was.
42698 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Given how alike family members can sound and given the quality of the average phone line"
I've recently had a few phone conversations with a cousin for the first time in years and it's amazing how like her mother she sounds. I'd be surprised if the system could tell them apart.
In passing I discovered that mailname@hotmail.com doesn't go to the same mailbox as mailname@hotmail.co.uk. I'd assumed they would and the fact that it isn't seems to open the door to impersonation without faffing with UTF look-alike characters.
"The charges were always dubious, which is why they never interviewed Assange in London..... And they never actually charged Assange with anything."
And there was me supposing that it was because Assange was in the Ecuadoran embassy. Are you telling me he wasn't fleeing anything but had gone to see about a tourist visa, got lost and couldn't find his way out for 9 years?
Remember there was no extradition warrant out from the US, just Sweden.
"I understand that it is distressing for genuine victims but allowing people to make false allegations just creates a new set of victims."
False allegations also make it more difficult for real victims. That was the case 40 years and more ago and no doubt still is. It looks as if we've been through a period where allegations were looked at less sceptically than previously and that resulted in a number of cases collapsing so we're now seeing a reaction to that.
Where a couple of spammers include real email addresses themselves you can always try sending one of them an email referring them to your colleague with the other address. After all, it'd be rude not to introduce them to each other after they've introduced themselves to you.
The other option is to have an email address just for such logins which is set to bounce. It's a variation of having a specific email address for specific companies - booking.com springs to mind for no particular reason - which is set to bounce as soon as a transaction has been acknowledged.
BTW is SEO spam still a thing? It seems to have tapered off since I started replying with my SEO self-assessment list.
Which is, of course, the last thing part of the email that you'll read because it's at the end.
It's just occurred to me that there might be a link to top-posting here. Do top-posters expect their emails to be read from the bottom upwards so that the reader will have got the context before reaching their pearls of wisdom?
I started in FORTRAN with coding sheets. When it came to making changes the most convenient way was to come in in the evenings when the data-prep teams had gone home and users could use the card punches. Eventually some card punches were made available for users during the day.
He pointed out that typing and them printing them in anticipation of sending them at a later date would create "all kinds of problems" – not least that none of them would have a sent date.
I'd have thought that not having a sent date on unsent emails really would have been the least of the problems.
Any new technology will eventually mature and when that happens the market will slow down to replacement plus younglings who've got their first pay-packet.
The one thing of which there's an inexhaustible supply is MBA/marketroid types who fail to appreciate this basic fact of life.
"Unless it is written into the contract, treat the case as if no backups exists"
If you make your own backups you should at least occasionally check that these are what you need to restore (it might be on the backup medium but it doesn't help if your restore process has problems). If you haven't successfully tested them don't assume you have backups.
How do you get to test your supplier's backups?
"if Sweden wants him, they take him. At the end... they return him back to the UK"
I'm not sure about the last bit. The extradition proceedings from which he was originally bailed were to return him to Sweden to face charges. After that process ended, including any sentence which might have been imposed either Sweden would have let him go free, dealt with any extradition proceedings which might have started in the interim or deported him as appropriate. I don't see why this would have changed; the bail charges here have been dealt with so, on completion of his sentence here, then there's no reason to demand his return.
"That said... how he behaves in prison is going to determine how well he survives."
Presumably you meant in a US prison. He could, of course, misbehave in a UK prison to extend his stay as a guest of HM hoping that a subsequent US government will simply ignore him.
"Your continued residency [in Ecuador's London embassy] has cost £16m of taxpayers' money."
And that wouldn't be something the judge judge said off her own bat, it would have been said to her. It could have been in prosecuting counsel's statement to the court, in which case Assange's lawyer could have objected, or given as evidence by a witness in which case it could have been cross-examined. In the absence of a full court report it would appear that the £16m wasn't challenged by the defence. Not that that appears to have been a consideration of Menasco who, presumably, is posting from outside the jurisdiction or hasn't heard of contempt of court.
"Required" is a weasel word when it's MS that get to define what they require. A more trustworthy term would be "the minimum required to perform the user's operation".
Definition by example is another problem as it can only be a partial list. Even if the definition is an apparently clear list of what's gathered you need to look at what's not excluded. For instance the last time I looked at the wordy MS privacy statement it included "transactions". At a casual glance it looks fair enough, if you buy something from Microsoft obviously they need to record the transaction. But it didn't say "your transactions with us", just "transactions" which covers any sort of transaction MS decide to snaffle; transactions with your bank, for instance, are equally covered.
Taking into account the last point we need to restrict that apparently trustworthy term a bit further: "the minimum required to perform the user's operation on a Microsoft provided service" and the place to define that isn't in relation to the OS, it's in relation to the services where it can be precisely defined for each service. Everything else should not be just "optional", it shouldn't be collected at all.
The other day I saw a report that said that an EV in Germany would have and 11% or more greater lifetime CO2 footprint due to their switching back to coal from nuclear.
For the whole of my adult lifetime we've been shoving unnecessary amounts of coal up power-station chimneys due to "Greens" objecting to nuclear power. Will they take responsibility for that? No chance.
Not quite sexing up the CV but when I made the transition from science to IT I came from using a system that had the Rand editor and not vi. I was given some minor stuff to look at on the first day and got by with some half-remembered ed commands - or maybe just catting into files. A quick trip to Dillons (RIP) at the end of the afternoon to get a vi book (still living a quiet life in my bookshelves and problem solved.
"Even today sending a space-hungry PDF, often containing a scanned image of a text announcement, will routinely appear when a simple text e-mail would have been enough."
It didn't involve a PDF but I did get an email from some marketing type which consisted of a brightly coloured image of the few words he wanted to send. As the sender worked for the Co-op I took great pleasure in pointing that it wouldn't have worked for a blind recipient depending on a screen reader and that it therefore conflicted with his employer's sense of social responsibility, inclusion or whatever.