Re: Never trust a CV
"just kicked against the case"
But as we all know the professionalism lies in knowing where to kick and how hard. Obviously the man for the job.
42496 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
What's your explanation for this and all the other reports of unsecured databases and backups we read about?
The data centres are run by IT people. Their brief is to keep the stuff running, install new kit and swap out whatever's failed.
If a client thinks that this is all their in-house IT do (or did may be too often more appropriate) or that it's all that's necessary to be done then maybe that's where the problem lies. Your comment suggests you might be one of those client people who thinks that. If so, ask yourself what stands between you and your business's becoming the subject of the next of these reports.
"It's not for a lack of tools, but a lack of understanding and implementation of the available tools."
Not really. It's so they can avoid - and even better, get rid of - those obstructive sods in IT who make such a fuss about who can get access and the hoops they have to jump through to do it. So much easier just to put it in the cloud. The people who run the cloud don't complicate things like IT do.
In Syntax Towers even cell-phones are expected to last a lot more than 2 years.
Count yourself lucky if it's something only she passes the time with. SWMBO started a patchwork class (allegedly to use up all the bits of fabric she'd stored up - we now have stacks more fabric) and weekly I get dragged into photographing the next project, tidying up with Gimp and then photocopying the class notes last minute on class mornings. And getting dragged into any fabric shops we happen to pass.
It's Monday evening - time to get the camera out again...
"This was just how physical ability worked"
There's another physical ability involved. In a family with an unweaned child it was necessarily the mother who did most of the child care. Once the child was weaned the next one often arrived about 9 months later.
"She said after about three weeks she noticed an increase in other fathers doing the school run. One of the other mothers explained that when they saw her hubbie doing the school run, it made it easier to get their own husbands to do the same."
Nothing to do with the husbands wanting a chance to hobnob with a billionaire?
"should be forcibly broken up."
Not as easy as it sounds. You could split off the stuff-selling and bit-barn business from each other and still have two businesses which remain a threat to the rest of their respective industries. You'd need to split those two businesses up so that at least they represented competition to each other.
And why not? That's basically what the reputation of any trading company should be based on. It makes no difference whether they were better of worse in the more distant past and you can't base it on what they'll be like in the future because your only sound predictor of that is what they've done recently.
"but Amazon have started claiming the lockers are "full" for smaller items"
It seems to be more complex than that. They won't deliver some sorts of products - for unclear and probably inconsistent reasons - to lockers. There may be a small print notice to this effect on the product listing but again I'm not sure it's consistent. But instead of telling you this explicitly when you try to assign it to a locker you get the "full" garbage.
Amazon seems to have become a distinctly curate's egg business.
Their store S/W is full of the above type of junk.
- Search was bad and has got worse. Results are padded with stuff that doesn't get anywhere near to matching search terms.
- I've seen tracking that showed a non-delivered product go into a warehouse and no further, there seems to have been no warning that something was wrong when it didn't get picked for despatch.
- I've had stuff shown as out for delivery to locker and then, for whatever reason, failed to be delivered. At that point they then fail to realise they need to despatch another PDQ or even realise that something;s wrong. When queried they'll tell you what they're doing to try to find the original. I've even had them report that it was found in a warehouse in another country. And they take the non-delivery as a return authorisation because that's the only way they can order a replacement so a courier then turns up to collect the undelivered item.
- The repeated attempts to flog Prime are beyond annoying.
Frankly I don't even care whether they use Oracle or their own database engine. I just wish the management of their logistics S/W was handed to somebody prepared to say "I don't care if it's running the biggest sales operation on the planet it's still not good enough.". Or maybe their logistics management would take that attitude and demand better.
OTOH I've found their Basics stuff to be OK. E.g. once well-respected British electrical goods company sold to asset-stripper who treat it simply as a brand; electric hot water jug has short-lived spring in the lid latch which fails in months. Like the asset stripper Amazon presumably get their equivalent made by some Chinese factory nobody in the West has heard of but theirs just works and keeps on just working.
"Invent one that can fish itself out of canals and rivers, or just take itself back to the store after being left half a mile away and I might be impressed."
Tackle the problem, not the symptoms. Self-braking trolley with GPS & geofencing; won't let itself be pushed off the premises.
The plain old mains plug is a fairly tough lump for the very good reason that safety matters.
I've no experience of Apple products but my latest laptop has a ghastly wall wart with a vulnerable looking plastic earth pin and an even more vulnerable looking rectangular plastic box on the back of it. I dread to think what an accidental kick would do to it. The combination of a localised mains lead with a rectangular or clover leave connector and a trailing power brick seems inherently much safer - an accidental kick of the power brick will simply move it across the floor.
"That slur on ISO 9000 has been repeated so often it isn't even funny any more."
It was never intended to be funny, just a comment on the quality scam industry.
The business I worked for long ago went from TQM (mantra: Get It Right First Time Every Time) to ISO 9000 (Continuous Improvement). When asked nobody in manglement was prepared to explain how, it we'd been getting it right first time every time there was scope for continuous improvement.
The value in a .com address is the result of the effort that the registrant has put into whatever goods or services lie behind it. The registrar has put in very little in terms of the costs of running the registry. If the registry raises the rate on the basis that the name is now more valuable perhaps the owner should invoice them for the work done in making it so.
"Why does every major update break something that has been stable for years?"
Maybe the real question is why has something appeared to have been stable for years? It may well be that the apparent stability is based on special handling for specific cases. The moment a change goes near such a case and somebody forgets to tweak the special handling it breaks.
"How the hell do you even get to that?"
It's simple. He has N thousand users. They all get updates and whatever the update does to their machines isn't a problem. It's whatever the great Microsoft did so it must be right. Complaints not allowed. He probably doesn't know it but all his users brought in their own devices and use those for actual work.
"What may have happened was that the suspect found and kept Bah's state ID that he earlier lost"
No. Bah was the suspect at one time. What may have happened is that the culprit found and kept Bah's ID.
The one whodunnit is the culprit (or perp if you want to use US jargon).
The suspect is the one who's suspected* of being the culprit but remains innocent until proved guilty.
Unless and until someone else is suspected, and there doesn't appear to have been, then there is at present no suspect.
*Big clue here as to meaning.