"Belfast NI"
It varies enormously. SWMBO's accent is a world away from Sandy Row or Newtonards Rd although, in fact, only a few miles. I think of it as a QUB accent. Whatever, I've spent the last half century or more with it very happily.
42400 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"The Yorkshire accent is pretty much North Yorkshire and some parts of West Yorkshire that wish they were in North Yorkshire"
Not so much now but it used to differ from village to village. And I can only assume that large parts of the North Riding were envious of the West Riding given the way they were grabbed into North Yorkshire in 1974. (We'd like Saddleworth back as well.)
"to be honest, there is actually quite a lot of under-rated pleasant countryside in that part of the world: trust those Yorkshire folk to keep it to themselves"
A former neighbour said he'd met someone convinced LOTSW countryside had been filmed somewhere else. If you show 'em and they still don't believe, what more can you do?
There seems scope for a little innocent amusement here. Uploading many copies of the same photograph - or even better, multiple copies of several different photographs of the same face, all tagged with different names and many photographs of different people all tagged with the same name. Maybe for the latter, the output of one of these systems that are supposed to generate photo-real images of faces.
"Or am I missing something?"
Yes. A couple of comments on my earlier comment explained it, as did previous comments when this was discussed.
It seems the target for this is individuals who have to use Linux to do their jobs, possibly working on cross-platform development but are stuck with employers who absolutely insist on Windows and nothing but Windows. It's a kludge to enable them to do their work on an ostensibly single-boot Windows desktop.
It's a substitute for the sanity of providing employees with the proper tools to do their jobs.
It's not relevant to Linux servers.
"All in all, the scene was not typical of what one would imagine from High Court exchanges between 2019's Commercial Litigation Silk of the Year and the attorney-general of the Duchy of Lancaster, himself a part-time High Court judge."
This sounds like the sort of legal fencing barristers are paid for, just the scene I would expect.
"Where I live, I can get within 400 meters of any point within the entire metropolitan area (population 3+ million) within 30 to 90 minutes using public transit, at any time between 5 am and 1 am next day."
Another case of "works for me so it must work for everyone". It doesn't.
A little while after I retired I had to go back to my former client to sign off some paperwork. I tried working out how long it would take me by public transport. It turned out that the best effort to get there as close to 9 am. as possible would involve starting out just before 6.30 to catch a bus. The bus trip to town takes 40 mins. (used to be 30 when I was growing up but they re-routed it). There was them a long wait until the next bus was due. That leg went by a frequently blocked motorway route to the next bus station which had about 4 minutes to change to the final bus; any delay on the motorway would have added at minimum another 12 minutes. The best effort as still a few minutes late assuming a 9 am. target. The journey by car was about 40 - 45 mins setting off in diametrically the opposite direction which is a good indication of why the public transport route was so inefficient.
Even with a straightforward radial route option travel isn't always that good. I used to live in High Wycombe and work in London. The best train option was 35mins (only one of those a day each way), most were IIRC up to 50mins (allegedly). Add on getting to the station and then a choice of longish walks or a few changes of tube to get to the final destination and the best case would be nearer 90 minutes. One of the worst cases would be getting to Paddington hoping to get the fast train, finding that I'd missed and then having to waste more time shlepping back to Marylebone to wait for BR to find enough working DMUs to make up a train.
But let's look again at that 90 min each way. That's 3 hours a day. 15 hours a week. About 2 additional working days each week unpaid. You might find that acceptable; in my book that's getting one's life eaten up.
"It can be done if you have the will to do it."
There are a few other factors to think about. Your fitness. Not everyone matches it. Your ability to ride a bike - not everyone can manage it without falling off (SWMBO tells me she's never managed it).
So yet another example of "works for me so must work for everyone else.".
"mass transit systems that work"
Mass transit systems work in the case where the places where you live and work are adjacent to the same route. Anything else and they eat up your life with meandering journeys punctuated by long waits to change bus or train.
You may ask why not move to live near a suitable route? Because multiple household members may need different routes and places to live are often determined by other factors such as children's schools or proximity to other family.
How about starting a blog/social media account and feeding the stuff straight into that? Email them one last time reminding them of previous communications and tell them you're going to do that so when their lawyers come storming out you can point them to that and tell them to go back and tell their clients that they should have cleaned up their act long ago.
" Outposts – servers designed by AWS to be housed in on-premises data centres"
And so the circle is completed. Computing in customer's premises and (presumably) a subscription to the vendor to keep it running. Give it another few years and somebody will invent Personal Computing. By using Personal Computing user departments will be able to free themselves of the mainframe cloud in the data centre.
"It is already allowing people to make 999 calls from areas where it was previously impossible"
999 calls are made from the public networks, whether POTS or mobile. What's that got to do with this project?
I can only assume that the HO has got a replacement for Rudderless, someone so lacking in technical nous that they can relay this without a trace of cognitive dissonance.
"no-one complains about how the EU is going to turn us all into small pink ducks, because it's not sodding true."
I expect it to be part of the Brexit party's platform at the forthcoming grandson's day off school. (He's doing well for his last May in primary school - two Bank Holidays and two closures for use as a polling station.)
They have, however, offered something. If there were no conditions attached allowing them to withdraw it I'd have thought that that would conclude an agreement. It wouldn't be a contract on account of lack of a consideration. Or maybe it would as these days the value of personal data provided to them might be a consideration in itself.
Interesting down vote there. I couldn't, at this distance of time tell you the date or the defendant's name. I could, however, tell you the name of the original judge, the court where the trial was due to have been held, the nature of the premises burgled (OK, I'll give you that - it was a butcher's shop), the nature of the more serious offence, where it happened and that, AFAICR, the trial for that was in No2 Court, Crumlin Rd. Do you know better?
"It's rather rare for anybody to try and change the Judge"
I've seen it attempted in a criminal case by getting an adjournment when the judge was a known hard sentencer. They got the case put off. Whilst on bail for a burglary the lad got mixed up in a far more serious case. I don't know what he got in the end but it would have been a lot more years than if he'd pleaded guilty to the burglary.
"It should not be necessary to close the browser, particularly when the worst offenders are likely to be closed down pretty quickly anyway (say, by having found them through a search, had a quick look to discover it wasn't what you were seeking, and immediately backing out)."
The offenders do include sites I might well have been seeking my local paper's site which has a list of over 100 friends to whom it wants me to allow them to send data (on a totally illegal opt-out basis). Making the exclusion permanent also requires me to allow the paper to set their own permanent cookie.
It's easier to have a standard browser fairly tied down with NoScript etc. that gets used for most of the time including with, say, elReg and another which is just used as needed and then (satisfyingly) blow away whatever the bastards were up to.
"If you have any information that would make it easier, I'd love to get my hands on it. I don't want to fork it,"
I think the original comment might have been ironical given the existence of PaleMoon, WaterFox and others: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Web_browsers_based_on_Firefox