Re: Back in the day
"Why does Windows have a wind sock?"
Just part of the junk.
42402 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Mike decided the best way to support the teacher was to leave him alone."
I think I'd have told him that if the problem was too much stuff in the inbox or on the PC I could leave it to him to clear some space - he'd have to do it himself as only he knew what had to be kept. And then reply to the follow-up calls telling him that he needed to delete more stuff.
You mean it's safer to go with someone you know you can't trust rather than someone you can trust for now on the off-chance that they might become untrustworthy later.?
For avoidance of doubt, Microsoft's president has admitted that they can't be trusted, although wrapped up in slightly longer phrasing.
It's hardly rocket science but would require a rewrite, retest etc. Then there's be the H/W refresh*. Yes, it's not rocket science but it gets all the expense and complication of being a government job because an extremely complex set of rules have to be followed to ensure the government gets value for money.
Of course it would need new H/W. Whatever made you think it wouldn't?
Does the UK have an "Einwohnermeldeamt" ??? My preferred translation helper only gives "local residents' registration office
Not really. There's voting registration but the only consequence of not registering is not being able to vote and it only requires listing of people of voting age. Apart from that there's the census* at 10 year intervals but I think some short-cuts are being put in place for the next one so it will probably become less reliable - the way things are going I wouldn't be surprised if it all gets handed over to AI.
* It doesn't really tell where people lived, just where they were on census night.
I've lived in an attic flat like that the door, first part of the hallway and bathroom were at a lower level than the rest of the flat and then there were four steps up to the other half of the wall and the living room, bedroom and kitchen. For some reason the hall was very wide. It could have had a studio flat built into the space.
That achieved its ultimate destination decades ago in my experience. A Stranraer* to Larne ferry had something called a Scotch pie on sale in its definitely not restaurant. I made the mistake of buying one. It consisted of a rigid pastry case whose contents were a greasy smear on the bottom.
* Yes, that long ago. In fact, longer.
"objecting to the new masts and then complain online about how bad the mobile phone network is"
There's a conflict between providing a mobile voice coverage and going to shorter and shorter ranges to provide more digital bells and whistles.
It's worth remembering that it's voice coverage that provides for calls for help in possible life and death situations.
"an arguably impossibly ambitious goal of breaking ground on a utility-scale fusion power plant in 2026"
Not at all impossibly ambitious. They can break ground. All that means is they dig a few trenches, even pour sume concrete into them. It doesn't mean they build anything operational on them.
"We want people to be able to ask questions as they would in everyday life; for example: 'I've just had a baby, do you know what help I can get?' Responses would combine material from multiple departments including HM Revenue and Customs, the Department for Work and Pensions, and the Department for Education into "a single, simple conversational answer."
Simpler, less new shiny, of course, but probably better, to have a single, well written, information page bringing all that information together, linked from wherever someone might look including the sites of those departments and NHS.
I suppose it's the "less new shiny" that's the killer. If it's AI it must be better, mustn't it?
Mustn't it?
"The first WSIS process saw participating nations pledge “to build a people-centred, inclusive and development-oriented information society, where everyone can create, access, utilize and share information and knowledge."
That's just getting the necessary PR speak out of the way.
"It also saw participating nations agree to the multi-stakeholder internet governance arrangements that persist to this day, and which sees organizations like the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the Internet Society (ISOC), and the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) each play a role."
This is the meat of it: the realisation that if the politicians try to take over they'll find they're holding nothing because the engineers will go away and create something new to replace it, probably taking the chance to clean up on a few issues of the sort that led to the IPv4/IPv6 situation.
Why was he unsuccessful as a PM? Because Blair stood aside at exactly the moment the full effect of his financial policies were due to hit.
What were those policies?
1. Charge current expenditure to the future. e.g. start taxing dividends on investments in pensions. That killed the final salary pensions. OK for those of us already in a scheme but not for our children.
2. Have interest rates target 2% inflation on an index that excluded housing costs. The result was that cheap money went into house price inflation and cheap loans secured against house values. 125% mortgages? That brought about the credit crunch. It painted future chancellors into a corner as any correction would have wiped out those with over-priced houses and those whose savings had been loaned on them. All in the name of a low headline interest rate.
Arguably the after-effects are still with us. I haven't seen anyone successfully pick up the pieces. No wonder he was followed by austerity.
A successful chancellor? I don't think so.
"He took issue with the fact that the TCN was referred to essentially as a backdoor for government snooping, describing the nomenclature as crude and erroneous." But effective.
"lawful access can be achieved in a way that strikes a balance between maintaining strong encryption and ensuring law enforcement and the government can protect the public from terrorism, serious crime, and hostile state activity." How?
All those in favour of this have to do to persuade us is to produce a proof of concept that withstands expert scrutiny. Failure to even attempt this speaks volumes.
Meeting regulatory requirements is a cost of doing business, not some sort of cross-subsidy. There were - probably stall are - rules about BT not subsidising one sort of business from another. It was attempts to get into non-regulated areas that started BT manglement on their loss-making international ventures in the 90s.
"Rural. Its different from Urban. One having a sparser population than the other. As a result there is often an infrastructure difference. You feeling ok today?"
I'm feeling fine living as I do in a rural location. We have neighbours on both sides of the road back down to the pub, church and cricket field and there are houses strung along the road with very few gaps all the way back to the exchange. Off the lane there's an estate with 48 houses and a smaller one with a few retirement flats. A couple of hundred metres up the road is are three more houses and another cluster a hundred or so metres further up. That may be sparse by urban standards, it's not isolated. You need to get out more.
Fair enough we do have good connections on this side of the valley. It's not clear why the other side isn't as well served - except for the fibre that was laid for the mobile mast.