"He doesn't see himself as someone who should be in prison."
That's one to rank alongside "he would say that, wouldn't he".
40485 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"In the magistrates' courts you call the judges sir or madam. "
In the magistrates' courts you can probably get away with calling a judge "mate" or anything else. They'll just be there as a member of the public, a witness, possibly - because they're all lawyers and some only sit as judges part-time - they might be acting as counsel (they may even be the accused). The folks on the bench are magistrates.
The attempts to dejargonify (oops, squiggly red line) computers has a lot to answer for and the car comparison is relevant.
Ask any car driver about the accelerator, brake, clutch (at least on a manual), engine, gearbox or whatever and they'll know what you mean. At some point all these items were new and their names technical and drivers had to be introduced to them. But they just became part of the vocabulary. It was accepted that even f you didn't know exactly how they worked you knew what they were for and what they did. Nobody was unsure as to whether the brake speeded the car up or slowed it down (being able to hit the correct pedal was a different matter).
Somewhere along the line we got to a stage where people who would never dream of challenging the names for the bits of their car was start complaining about jargon when it came to their computer. Obligingly, vendors took to hiding the workings, trying to make everything seamless so that users, who would have coped just as easily with names for the components of their computer as they would with their cars*, now see it as an undifferentiated "thing" which works by magic.
* I will make an exception for my late aunt who must have been well into middle age when she got her car, an ancient Morris 8. She knew that when it appeared to have run out of petrol she needed to open the bonnet and hit a nameless black cylinder with something solid. Readers of a suitable vintage will instantly recognise an SU fuel pump but she didn't need to know that.
"Historically Microsoft have been willing to go to court against the US government in order to not hand over information."
Indeed they did and good for them. So the US invented the CLOUD Act to get round all that. You'd think that Microsoft would have been opposed to it wouldn't you? No, they welcomed it.
A quick check: a Chinese company, say Huawei, storing US gov. data - is that OK?
"They're also subject to random checks by the Crown Commercial Service to make sure they're storing UK government data correctly."
And if a foreign government has the right to order the supplier to hand over data you'd think that that wouldn't pass as correct? Clearly not.
I don't know the technology but our gas supply must have been installed with something of that nature possibly in that sort of timeframe - there's certainly no sunken remnant of a trench like that for the drain, water & phone. Possibly also the electricity supply and that must have been installed in 1968.
"most people believe that when they speak to an Alexa-enabled device, it converts their voice into a set of digital computer instructions… They do not expect that Alexa is creating and storing permanent recording of their voice."
Really? I wouldn't trust any such device not to store it. Not even if the vendor outright denied it. (Never believe a rumour until it's been officially denied - Jim Hacker)
The trees are a regular crop and not a problem. The standing crop is temporarily sequestered carbon so growing trees for paper is mildly beneficial.
It's the lack of thought about incidental effects such as transport, processing and disposal of a totally useless batch of leaflets by a group who ought to be against it that's the objection. That and the keep-your-filthy-hands-off-my-car issue but as it happened they'd already done their round of the car park when I got there and didn't come back again.