Re: Is it actually becoming a thing
"False positives can be worse than false negatives"
Both are bad. If stationary obstacles have to be ignored to avoid false positives the system is not fit for deployment on public roads.
42414 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"The reason that people have died as a result of the safety features built in to Teslas is due to human error, the Uber was due to human error."
So let's deride the human driver's ability. Let's deride the human driver by calling him or her a meatsack. But when the situation gets beyond the much-vaunted AI dump the problem in the human's lap, probably after a long period of having nothing to do has sapped the human's attention and almost certainly when it's too late to do anything and then blame the human.
Did I miss anything?
"Defence lawyer serves a few purposes, regardless of the defendant's guilt/culpability:"
0) Advise defendant about pleading guilty.
Admittedly plea bargaining taints this but if a guilty verdict is inevitable the best mitigation might be to plead and be as apologetic as possible. Back in the day in Belfast one of the QCs, if such advice wasn't taken would simply sit there ensuring the defendant got a fair hearing by making sure the prosecution didn't step out of line* but asking few if any questions. His car reg number, BTW, was FIB 1.
* He once intervened to stop the prosecution, who'd called me, from cross-examining me trying to get me to say more than I was prepared to about a hair comparison.
I never rated hair comparison as generally useful and couldn't understand why the FBI were so keen on it - they were internationally renowned for their enthusiasm. I was pleased to see years afterwards that they eventually fell flat on their collective face over it. The FBI were wrong and I was right. Yay!!!
"The Lib Dems came off much worse from that team-up."
Not surprising as most of their voters seemed to treat it as a protest vote. It came as a big surprise to them that the leadership actually acted responsibly given that the alternative might have been a continuation of BankruptciesRUs Brown.
The other thing that came as a surprise to then was that in government, especially in a coalition, you can't get all your policies implemented because reality gets in the way,. The big casualty there being student loans because that was how Blair/Brown had funded the expansion of Universities.
After watching what's been happening in the world over the last many years - and that extends well beyond any the tenure of most heads of government - I feel that the standard of government would be much improved if, immediately after any head of government ended their tenure, a formal investigation were to be started as a matter of routine to determine whether any criminal offences were committed by their government whilst in power, maybe extend that to the election process by which they got there and, should any evidence be found prosecution would follow.
No political element as there is in impeachment and no possibility of interference which could be exerted whilst they're an incumbent. Just concentrate minds on whether they could, if need be, defend their actions in court against cross-examination.
"it was just a beautifully architect 3 mm allen key"
I remember the HP engineers turning up to remove a transit bar from a tape drive. It had been fixed with the then supposedly rare-as-hen's-teeth Torx headed bolt. Except I had a set of Torx bits in my really quite cheap screwdriver set and the tape drive was already in use.
I guess it is too late to stop calling ourselves "admin" or "administrators", a pity as it makes it sound like we're doing minimum wage work
The trouble is that if your title is system manager they want to know where are all the people you manage. The manglement mind is unable to grasp that there are major responsibilities that don't involve budget or head-count.
Over telnet (them were t'days) it was reasonably common for the various characters in vt100 escape sequences to get separated and in vi the tilde would flip case. And in those days it was normal to edit passwd directly. So root became Root.
No problem, just log in as Root. Except also back then Unix had a built-in assumption that you might well be working on a teletype which only had upper case so if the first character entered on login was upper case it would obligingly switch to doing everything in upper case. Root, root and ROOT were all one and the same so the user name wasn't a problem. But when you're in upper case only you can't enter the lower case characters of a password and get them hashed to the correct value.
Fortunately there was an already logged in root session on the console.
It's surprising how quick they can turn up when there's a problem like that. A few months ago there was a problem with the neutral. Once I'd reported it they were quite panicky about making sure everyone in the houses affected shut things off to avoid damage. It's probably the possibility of being on the hook for damage that motivates them.
From what I can make out of the synopsis on-line it is photosynthesis and the argument is that it was out-gassing from volcanoes that raised the carbon-dioxide levels so photosynthesis produced more oxygen. It then depends on the fixed carbon (and hydrogen) being buried and not burned or respired so that the oxygen has a chance of remaining in the air although as said elsewhere in the comments it was initially used up geochemically by oxidising free previously elemental metals.
And yes, that makes more sense.
Doesn't the US have a small claims route? A class action is probably more efficient for a big corporation to fight and undoubtedly more efficient (at reeling in fees) for lawyers but it doesn't seem very efficient for claimants. A big corporation can't effectively fight a few million individual claims for small amounts when it can't claim costs if it loses; settling promptly is its best option.
"However, the FCC has clearly demonstrated that it doesn't actually want to do anything about this problem, and so I don't think they'll start unless they're legally compelled to."
Which is why I think the effective scheme would be one which enables the recipient to charge a fee for handling the calls by dialling a suitable code. It would be necessary for the telcos to put n place a tracing and charging system but would allow each telco that has to pass the charge back to add on its own handling charge. Any telco that failed to be able to trace back would carry the can for that charge.
It would never actually come into operation, of course because the telcos would realise they'd be lumbered with costs they'd never recoup through those charges because it would bleed the robocallers dry within days. But it would achieve the required end because the prospect of having a nice little earner turned into a money pit would result in the telsos suddenly discovering they could put a stop to the whole thing without going to that trouble.