"Well they cost five quid each you know..."
And what's the value of the data on it?
40413 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"So continual saving means a new file format designed for that."
ODF formats have "flat" versions, i.e. not zipped and compressed. I thought that maybe they were intended for use with versioning systems built on diffs - SCCS, git and anything in between - which would overcome this. But no, elements are sequence numbered and a small change near the start causes the rest of the elements to be renumbered when the file is saved. It's no more suited to that than MS Office formats.
Clearly it would be possible for a file format intended to be saved economically in versions. It would also enable remote saving by means of a proper client server protocol instead of relying on emulation of a file system, something that would help protect against ransomware.
Perhaps it's time to start thinking of a new, open format based on these lines.
"It's also annoying that 2 days later her parents contacted the school complaining that 'we'd' lost her data and refused to help her get it back"
Does the school emphasis - from the start - that multiple copies must be saved? It would be good practice to run spot checeks with students; "How many save copies do you have? When did you last save one?".
"Others might start pushing other solutions to their clients and they would be in better position to know which clients could ditch MS either partially or fully."
If they really see their future as running servers for their customers to connect to they maybe don't care what clients the customers are running and if they can ditch Windows altogether then they don't have to support it.
"Its 'non trivial', it takes a lot of time and effort to get things to function properly."
It's exactly because we know that that we don't trust them.
"I'm a retiree -- one of those old people that are regarded with amusement because we don't understand computers....or maybe we do, since we've been riding them up from the beginning."
Well so am I. See my comment above.
"not linked to any personal or identifiable information"
If the recording contains personal identifiable information it doesn't need to be linked to anything else - it is not "all well".
"We just learned that one of these language reviewers has violated our data security policies"
Translation: somebody blew the whistle on us.
"It is intended to ensure that two people working side by side in a similar role for the same employer pay the same employment taxes."
Fair enough - provided security of employment and all other employee benefits are considered a taxable benefit in kind.
If they're not then IR35 ensures they aren't paying the same taxes.
"it is supposed to fall on its sword for being the victim?"
You have a bank account containing a thousand of your local currency units. The bank is robbed and can no longer return your deposit. But I take it you don't care because it was the bank that was robbed, not you.
The fines are based on several criteria according to the GDPR and ICO policy. Firstly the GDPR lays out maximum fines. Secondly the ICO makes a decision based not only on the nature of the event but also on the approach of the offender. A non-cooperative business is going to see much bigger fines. It appears that Marriott were cooperative but their self-serving statement and intention to challenge the fine leads me to think that top management have not learned their lesson and the fine should be bigger and if I were a potential customer I'd maybe look elsewhere.
"I fail to understand how the ICO can properly punish a USA corporation for failing to protect the data of (for example) USA citizens stored in the USA"
It can't. As far as the ICO or any EU regulator is concerned it can lose millions of US citizens' data every day of the week providing none of them are EU residents. That's the criterion: EU residence.
"As an EU based company they're nailed for not looking after EU citizens data"
The fact that they're an EU company doesn't affect the issue although it would make non-payment a bit easier to deal with. Nor does their being multiple entities which don't, in this case, firewall legal
liabilities. The salient fact is that EU residents' data was involved.
"We as a society just need to have that conversation and decide where we want the balance to be"
We had that conversation several centuries ago and came up with a good answer, the presumption of innocence. The conversation that's needed now is about why it's being ignored so often.
"wasn't good enough just because you usually had to try twice to plug it in"
Not just that. Having got it plugged in you found it had the wrong micro-connector on the other end. So did all the others within sight. When you found the right cable you then found it didn't work anyway. It was a faulty cable.
"During the meeting with Polequaptewa, Blue Stone executives asked that Polequaptewa 'turn over' all of the data needed to hand the IT, web design and marketing over to the third party external companies,"
I'd have thought he could have done a fair amount of damage quite legally by just resigning on the spot depending on how well - or not - it was all documented. It'd probably have cost them a packet just to have the outsourcers get up to speed.