Re: Goodbye-ee!
There are two good reasons to be in the EU. One is economic. The other, as you have so rightly reminded us, is that the EU is a far better safeguards of our rights than any UK govt. of recent years.
40557 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Maybe you should think that one through a bit more. J R-M has moved his company out of the UK into the EU. What does that tell you about his estimate of the effects of his political policy on UK as a place to do business? Is that a mitigation any UK employee of any UK business thinks would be in their individual interest?
1. "The greatest ever majority in the referendum" was pretty well a dead heat. A simple majority may be fine in first past the post voting for an MP you'll be able to change in five years time. We don't make much use of referenda. Those countries that do usually require a very substantial majority to make a permanent change to the status quo. Failing to do so is at the core of the govt's problems since then. And let's not forget that word "advisory".
2. " the expressed wishes of 80% of the electorate" At the last general election the turnout was a little under 69% so your 80% is total and utter bollocks on this ground alone. Secondly no one party got even 50% or the votes who did turn out. More bollocks. And the only thing that the electorate are asked to vote on is their choice of candidate in their constituency, all of whom will have a wide variety of policies, individual and party, so there is no direct way of arguing from the vote to any particular policy. Which leads us to..
3. It's the successful candidates, voted in at the last general election who are now challenging a PM determined to ride rough-shod over Parliament in almost as arrogant a fashion as Charles I. That's representative democracy in action.
Labour will probably agree to an election once the immediate threat of 'no deal' is off the table. If they do this (as they suggest) once the no deal bill has had royal assent, but before the extension is asked for then it's possible Johnson could wait, hold the election in mid October, win a majority and repeal the new law to untie his hands.
I think Starmer realises this. Even Corbyn might realise it. It's a possibility but less of a probability.
A year or so ago I ordered a left hand door mirror for SWMBO's car.
Despite being in all day when DPD were supposed to deliver it there was no sign of it and shortly after it was due to be delivered a note appeared on the web site saying that there was nobody in and they'd left a card. There was no card in our letter box. I reckoned that the basic problem was that we have no house number but a spelled out number is in the house name and the site ordered from had no concept of an address without a number. I realised they'd attempted to deliver to a numbered house down the road.
After much effort I finally got a phone number for DPD that didn't immediately drop through to an automated system that told me the package had not been able to be delivered (the first time I keyed in the package number; all subsequent attempts to any DPD customer disservice number would recognise my number from CLI and not even bother asking). The parcel was then sent out with the corrected label. At the appropriate time courier with an anonymous white van turned up so I went to meet him to ensure he didn't escape. I was handed a package. Not, unfortunately a DPD-shipped package but another one I was expecting. I went back indoors and found the familiar note on the website - not in, left card. I'm sure it was the same white-van man contracting for both firms and, presumably recognising the packaging and not bothering with the label, attempted to deliver to the same wrong house.
Despite the fact that they'd never actually attempted to deliver to the right house DPD insisted I'd had the due number of attempted deliveries and took it to the collection point miles away. I drove over there, picked up the box and took it home. I opened the box and found a right hand mirror.
Our neighbour in Lisburn (N Ireland) was in the "Greenfinches" (rather like PCSOs today). A group of French tourists parked in the control zone where you're not supposed to leave a car unattended in the middle of town & went shopping. When they returned they insisted, I'm not sure how, that none of them knew any English. My take on it was that they should have discussed calling the bomb squad to deal with it, i.e. blow the bloody doors and boot lid off. I reckoned there would have been a miraculous recovery of linguistic skills.
"We get banned from driving for dangerous driving or drinking or drugging while driving"
This is the core problem. Drivers can be held responsible and too many non-drivers take this as licence to be irresponsible. It's so much easier to not have to bother to take any responsibility for your own safety if the entire effort can be dumped on someone else.
"My house is on a route that climbs several hundred metres and is a challenge for sports riders"
I live in a similar area but my experience is different. Too many of them are self-entitled twats. There also seems to be a cycle club that annually feels entitled to simply take over the lanes to hold some sort of event, even setting themselves up to act as policemen on point duty whilst singularly lacking the skills to do that.
"The worst that the ISP has to worry about (apart from a massive labour cost fixing it all) is that customers walk, otherwise this hacker would also face further consequential damages."
Those whose systems got knocked off-line might be interested in claiming for damages. A skiddie might not be worth suing. An ISP on the other hand...
Given that Cloud is sold to manglements on the basis that it takes away all those complications of dealing with their in-house expert staff and hands it over to people who'll just do the work without arguing those rants seem fully justified.
It is somebody else's computer. When using your own computers you expect someone on your staff to look after them. If you've been persuaded to use somebody else's because it's cheaper you might reasonably expect that somebody else to do the looking after. Anything else smacks of keeping a dog and barking yourself.
"a witness who is subpoenaed must show up in court"
IME they certainly don't have to attend every day in a long trial nor even stay on the days when they do attend if they're not going to be called that day. Otherwise I'd have wasted even more time hanging about the Crumbling Road House of Fun than I did.
Everyday browsing/email/RSS/Usenet is Seamonkey here.
Palemoon set slightly less tied down than the Seamonkey installation for a few sites.
Waterfox even less tied down for less friendly sites but with data cleared at close-down. Cookies? Don't care, they'll be gone. FIngerprinting? Don't care, I'll likely not be back.
ISTR taking a look at Chromium some time ago but didn't bother with it.
"The biodiesel had 'gone-off' and turned to jelly in the tanks."
I still remember a long, circuitous and cold journey from Marylebone to High Wycombe because the non-bio diesel had gelled in the tanks of the BR signalling power supply. Cold weather was quite sufficient.
I had a client who took security very seriously. At one stage they did use a business as described above to test staff although by means of phone calls. I fielded a few of those and replied pointing out that the first word of the company name was "Security" and that it meant what it said. AFAIK the staff came out of the test very well.
If any(!) money were recovered by the company it would go into the company's bank account (less whatever the lawyers get) and thus become shareholders' property. The shareholders, however, might reasonably (a) prefer to keep existing funds away from lawyers and (b) want to know more about what Tripp has to say about the way the business is managed. But that's what AGMs are for.