Re: Always the last minute with the suits
In this case you can't really blame them for holding out as long as possible.
40485 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Given that Cloud is sold to manglements on the basis that it takes away all those complications of dealing with their in-house expert staff and hands it over to people who'll just do the work without arguing those rants seem fully justified.
It is somebody else's computer. When using your own computers you expect someone on your staff to look after them. If you've been persuaded to use somebody else's because it's cheaper you might reasonably expect that somebody else to do the looking after. Anything else smacks of keeping a dog and barking yourself.
"a witness who is subpoenaed must show up in court"
IME they certainly don't have to attend every day in a long trial nor even stay on the days when they do attend if they're not going to be called that day. Otherwise I'd have wasted even more time hanging about the Crumbling Road House of Fun than I did.
Everyday browsing/email/RSS/Usenet is Seamonkey here.
Palemoon set slightly less tied down than the Seamonkey installation for a few sites.
Waterfox even less tied down for less friendly sites but with data cleared at close-down. Cookies? Don't care, they'll be gone. FIngerprinting? Don't care, I'll likely not be back.
ISTR taking a look at Chromium some time ago but didn't bother with it.
"The biodiesel had 'gone-off' and turned to jelly in the tanks."
I still remember a long, circuitous and cold journey from Marylebone to High Wycombe because the non-bio diesel had gelled in the tanks of the BR signalling power supply. Cold weather was quite sufficient.
I had a client who took security very seriously. At one stage they did use a business as described above to test staff although by means of phone calls. I fielded a few of those and replied pointing out that the first word of the company name was "Security" and that it meant what it said. AFAIK the staff came out of the test very well.
"You need to review these things regularly and do a sanity check on them."
It's my view that a policy should include the statement of its rationale. It has the advantages of leading to a better understanding of its significance by those who have to follow it (senior management, is that you?) and aids periodic review.
If any(!) money were recovered by the company it would go into the company's bank account (less whatever the lawyers get) and thus become shareholders' property. The shareholders, however, might reasonably (a) prefer to keep existing funds away from lawyers and (b) want to know more about what Tripp has to say about the way the business is managed. But that's what AGMs are for.
"The purpose of Brexit is to restore sovereignty to the UK."
Purpose and result are two different things. As an isolated nation the UK will have far less clout in the world than it did as part of a larger block. (Note that phrase "part of" because that's the situation, not "subject to" which seems to be the Leaver view.) I really can't see how having less clout equates to "restored sovereignty" but, hey, we'll have taken back control.
"Most of the world are not members of the EU."
Most of the world haven't been UK business's home market or a major part of UK industry's supply chain for four decades. They still won't be so there's no difference there.
The EU has been UK business's home market and a major part of UK industry's supply chain for four decades. Now it won't be. That's where the big difference lies and it's not a good difference.
"Modern DR is based on replication/mirroring and built-in resilience."
Where are those replicates and mirrors? If they're all on the same site as the primary system then consider that they don't exist. The fire that takes the primary will take them as well. You've not had a fire yet? Note that word "yet".