Re: grep?
There's an old rubric about only using sed where tr won't do, only using awk where sed won't do etc.
42400 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Given the number of people they talk to shall we just self isolate all staff at all telecoms and mobile companies now?"
From my experience of BT management any of the senior management could be carrying the Black Death without any impact on the rest of the staff. Let me correct that: without any adverse impact.
"There were very few process changes -but- the icon for the shortcut changed and the color scheme changed."
What you - and the designers - haven't realised is that whose details are part of the process, especially if they've been set in the cement of a workplace manual that MUST be adhered to.
At one client we had a number of systems which worked similarly and used different backgrounds (MDI) so that the users could be sure they had the right application open.
"high capacity USB memories are really cheap why bother with a random one of unknown parentage?"
In reality you're not going to use the storage medium once, irrespective of how cheap they are. That stick is going to go back and forth between your allegedly air-gapped computer and one that isn't. When that happens you don't really have an air-gapped machine at all.
"A hospital application that allows the janitor to prescribe controlled substances is seriously flawed."
You've just triggered a memory from long ago. Back when prescriptions were mostly on paper new classes of prescriber kept getting introduced and our standing joke was the car park attendant prescriber would be next.
"There is zero excuse for the IT team of any large organisation not to begin preparation for a change of OS"
I know it's unfashionable these days but the first step of that is a feasibility study. The second step might then be a it of CV polishing. Alternatively submitting an estimate might be the second step in which case the CV polishing comes third.
The "picking a different component" means spending those millions on replacing H/W and still find that its replacement still has the same generic problem: expensive H/W is expected to have a life exceeding that of a typical O/S.
It's also not straightforward demanding support includes updating to a new O/S. Firstly the certification will be based on the original configuration and it's not going to be feasible to re-certify every patch Tuesday. Secondly the expected life of expensive H/W might also exceed that of the original vendor.
The expected life of the expensive H/W might also exceed the life of the H/W running the S/W. Even if the vendor excrows a few original motherboards per unit by the time they're needed the caps might have dried out.
A few weeks ago I visited the local archives to see some deeds from the 1200s. Apart from an ink spillage on one of them, probably a few hundred years ago, they wee fine.
Probably the Mylar film I used to use about 50 years ago is OK, it just hasn't had the same long testing as parchment.
"The system may use proprietary software (and possibly hardware) that is not entirely compatible with Windows 10."
Quite. Despite our friend's snide comments about parchment one of the problems with digital archives is that you need to be prepared - and able - to migrate your data to new formats as well as updating H/W & S/W.
"a country borrows in its own currency from its own central ban ... as long as inflation doesn't go up too much"
"Borrowing" money from the central bank and cancelling the debt afterwards is printing money. Inflation is the consequence.
Of course we could just print a teeny bit so there isn't "too much" inflation. But now prices have gone up a bit so we have to print a teeny bit more so government can cover increaed costs and .... why is inflation out of control?
"but as a smaller company, can you really do better?"
RISC-V itself isn't a company, it's a group of companies cooperating. It might be chancy for a single vendor to make its own extensions but it could be quite feasible for some or all of the group to decide on the need for a given set of extensions and cooperate on those as well.
"Facebook would rather pay £2 billion to its army of lawyers than admit it's at fault"
It makes no difference whether it admits it or not if the the court decides it was at fault. I'd have thought there facts are fairly well documented by now and this appears to be a civil suit so it would be decided on balance of probabilities (assuming Oz law works like UK). I'd expect the main argument to be about damages.
"running up a bill of £50k when I scanned a cheap costume jewellery necklace"
Better than pricing a valuable antique at a couple of quid. SWMBO also volunteers in a charity shop and is furious when somebody turns up on an antiques programme with something really valuable that they acquired that way.
Back in forensic days my fire investigation colleagues had a case where fires were started on several occasions in the same house and were looking at possible means of arson. Then they traced it to a large silver bowl. Which years later led to a large gulp when I realised SWMBO's makeup mirror had put a long scorch mark on a the side of a chest of drawers. Luck escape. These concave mirrors are dangerous.
Unfortunately the pros and cons of encryption only get debated by proxy via this cat and mouse game of the usual suspects introducing such bills.
As the US is so keen on its written constitution and amendments perhaps its time they debated it explicitly by deciding what rights their citizens should have to privacy and security of communication.