"Are Microsoft taking the piss ?"
When weren't they?
40560 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
The guy made it available under some FOSS licence, the company seems to have abided by that licence.
In fact they seem not to have. The licence is the Apache licence: https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
See in secont 4.c: "You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works" (my emphasis). As far as I can understand from the article they have not done so.
There parking vultures sent me a snotty letter saying if I did it again I'd be fined. I decided the best way to avoid the risk of that was to never go into a Tesco car park again. The best way to avoid that was never to go into a Tesco again.
The really annoying thing was that when they looked after things themselves they sent someone out to control the exit gate when they were busy; that day they weren't, it appeared to be a day when half the population was spending a really hot summer day watching other people kick a ag of wind up and down a field.
Also annoying was the fact that I'd driven into town to pick up SWMBO, do some shopping in Tesco & go home for lunch. We decided to eat in town and were about to pass on the shopping but I decided that as we'd parked there it would only be fair to use the shop, otherwise we'd have been out, having bought nothing, in under the time limit.
It seems that Tesco don't actually want you to shop in their stores. It's amused me since to note how their market share has shrunk over the years and realise that my absence has contributed a good few £k to that by now. And the real irony is that as they'd outsourced the car park they probably had no idea about the letter and that that's why my card suddenly stopped being used; so much for their alleged expertise in number-crunching.
I think it works like this:
You post something which is a matter of opinion somebody disagrees with and they can argue against it.
You post something which is self-evident and somebody who disagreed with it can say to themselves "Oh, that's right" and move on or, if they can't manage that they downvote it. As a further measure they seek out other posts be the same poster and downvote those as well.
Look on those downvotes as an acknowledgement.
Ee bah gum means "oh my god" in the Yorkshire dialect.
Correction: bah is "by", not "my".
"the phrase is archaic, originated in Yorkshire and is used almost exclusively there, is not commonly used and will not be known to the majority of people outside Yorkshire or to young people"
IME it's used exclusively by people who think they're putting on a Yorkshire accent.
"And if we have to pay BT for that, then we need to prevent them cherry-picking sites, perhaps by requiring 100% coverage of a county before each payment."
Unlike the cable companies who were allowed to cherry pick whilst BT wasn't allowed to provide anything other than POTS and who then want to piggy-back on OpenReach's fibre when it's in place.
Despite all their vaunted number-crunching skills Tesco almost certainly don't know why I stopped shopping there years ago. It's what comes of handing over a part of their operation to a 3rd party. In that case their car park to a parking vulture who I very much doubt shares data with them.
Same thing applies. Dumbos are willing to pay. They get data. What actual use is it? At the end of the line it has to either get written off or has a false valuation attached. I suspect the entire data trading economy is an example of making a precarious living by taking in each other's washing.
My HP printer is one of the old-school all-in-one mono single-sided jobs that depends on an external Jetdirect box for an Ethernet connection. It's unlikely to be able to send anything back. OTOH it looks solid enough to last until the heat death of the Universe. When I decided to get a colour duplex printer as well I remembered the quality of the more modern HP all-in-ones my daughter's employers had provided for her home office - and bought a Brother.
Could it have anything to do with the fact that the UK has been under an economic cloud for years? Firstly we had the economic crash and more recently UK industry - what's left of it - has been under threat of losing most of its home market. Why would anyone resort to capital expenditure when cheap labour needs no long term commitment.
"My 'phone number is evidently linked to my account number, so 'phone back - system knows it's me (well, my house/gas account), select a couple of push button options, key in the meter reading. sorted."
Mine obviously was, that's why they called - either that or they were calling the wrong number. And maybe now they could make the link if I called back, something they should have had in place from the start. But I gave up on them and have no intention of wasting time to see if they've debugged their system (if they were paying me to debug it for them it would be different).
So I ignore them and they send somebody out to read it. Sorted.
"Now I get an automated 'phone call from British Gas asking me to read the meter and supply the result online or by automated 'phone line."
I keep getting that. The first few tries they'd rung off by the time I got to the meter which is on the opposite gable to the front door. Then I tried the ring back and it assumed I had my account number to hand (no attempt to match CLI with the number they called on). So now I've given up and just ignore their calls. They might have improved things since then but how would I know - I ignore them? Moral: get it right first time.
There's a very odd passage in the linked article: "the [MIT] administration created a very specific and well thought out policy, which basically says that any relationship where two people are in different positions of power (professor*-student, director-staff, etc.) cannot coexist with a sexual/romantic relationship or any type of sexual activity."
My own marriage was, I suppose, technically a staff (research assistant)/(research) student relationship although there's not much, if any, difference in power there. But in my undergrad days the wife of the acting head of department had previously been his research student. Later, n the department where I met SWMBO, one of the lecturers was married to a technician. It's not uncommon for people to meet their partners at university and not entirely unusual for those to be in different roles.
This rule seems to be harking back to the very bad old days when a married woman had to resign or the nearly as bad days when a married couple couldn't work in the same department. AFAICR even in our case we had to check that that wouldn't be an issue.
My advice to the people drawing up this sort of policy would be to be very careful what you wish for.
* AFAICS in the US any tenured member of staff seems to be termed a professor. In the UK this is not so. For comparative purposes a university lecturer would have to be regarded as a professor in these terms.
"The invocation of Article 50 was very much in line with the country's constitutional processes."
If BoJo goes ahead on the lines he was suggesting earlier (he seems to have been back-pedalling on that) the overall process wouldn't have been. If a new HMG and the EU were looking for a basis to unwind the whole thing I'm sure they'd deem it a breach of the Art 50 terms.
Maybe not a bad idea.
In the distant days when I was a teenager I went to Paris with a group of schoolf riends. It involved a long coach ride to Lydd, being catapulted taking a very short air trip to the nearest air strip across the channel and another long coach ride to Paris. And then the same in reverse to get home. On the coach ride back from Lydd we had an extra passenger. He'd come down by coach for the next week's trip and didn't realise he needed a passport.