Re: And what about key fobs....
Or the access was about as secure as the lockers.
40557 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Seriously, what if your house was on fire and your wife was inside and couldn't get to a window?"
Internal mechanical over-ride. Panic bar, panic button whatever you want to call it. Fail to locked is secure. Mechanical override is safety. Both are basic requirements.
Similar to my car's automatic headlights. Yes they do always switch on when it's actually night or nearly so. But they'll also come on during bright sunshine. Or going under a bridge. OTOH on a dark day driving along a long lane with an overhanging tree canopy they remained resolutely off. And then there's the allegedly self-dipping electronic mirror.
"I've now arranged to get a better boiler fitted by our regular gas-safe plumber for £1500 less than BG's quote."
And he'll undoubtedly do a better deal on servicing than the extended warranty the makers will try to foist on you no matter how many times you return their letter-box litter as unwanted junk.
Great respect for the guys who live jointed the faulty 3-phase in our road a few months ago; that would rate at a huge amount more than 10A. About 12Ω showing in the neutral. It buts onto the section that was replaced with similar problems a few years ago. I think the entire cable is being replaced in 12 metres stages.
There are a couple of reasons. One is that they involve processes and kit that are seldom used. When they do come to be used they haven't had the shakedown that daily use involves so are likely to be more fragile and, in the case of equipment, possibly expired of old age. Of course that leads to a situation where regular testing is avoided due to fear which just makes the situation worse.
The other is that they only come into play in extreme situations which might be so extreme as to exceed their capabilities, e.g. a lightning strike that took out all the thyristors in the building UPS leaving the non-UPS power unaffected.
A client had a SCO box on a UPS with a serial link to start a shutdown. I can't remember the details but doing something which shouldn't have touched the UPS at all started the count down to power-off. The phenomenon was repeatable. I was never able to resolve it but it seemed as if something in the IP stack was also affecting the serial link.
"I'm sure this is where some other commentard is gonna tell me of just such a file system!"
Not such a file system but certainly such a system. Open/NextCloud keeps versioned files (it's the V in WebDAV) and there are a couple of server side apps that claim to detect such behaviour.
But that's a client-server system. Maybe what we need is a new architecture that fits that into one box. Your user-facing WP, spreadsheet or whatever doesn't directly read and write files but asks for such services from the server. Maybe two VMs would be enough to run client and server or, for the truly paranoid sensibly security minded, two separate processors. For added security the formats of the updated files could be checked before being saved.
"I and many of my fellow English people are fine with Scottish independence because we are sick and tired of hearing about it."
The whole of the UK should have been given the vote but I suppose the result would have looked like being thrown out and that wouldn't have suited the wee man's ego.
"So you'd like to pay for your driving per-mile"
I'd like what I pay for in car tax on a flat fee basis and indirectly on a per-mile basis in fuel tax to be spent on roads. I have no doubt whatsoever that if any government introduced per-mile charges it would be additional to the other transport taxes.
"Having an infrastructure provider as Network Rail in public hands where private operators compete on is a good thing. Whether you agree that Train Operating Companies should be private or public is another matter. I see very few people debate that Network Rail should be privatised too.
Why not replicate the set up for rail similar to that for broadband?"
Why not? Because having the rail infrastructure separate from the operators gives the former no incentive to do a good job and denies the latter the means to do so. It was an arrangement guaranteed to produce little improvement on BR days. That's why not.
"not like it was done."
Certainly not.
We had companies paying to run shortish term franchises over infrastructure somebody else owned and ran. And I never did find out who owned and ran the station whose employee was still trying to find my pre-booked ticket and still had to sell me a car park ticket whilst the train was pulling into the station. I arrived by car about 15 minutes later than if I'd taken the train and would have been a good deal earlier than that if I hadn't bothered with the train at all.
Hmm. I wonder how old the text books and/or their authors were. By the late '80s the difference between the black telephone rationing company and the privatised BT were becoming obvious. Either the books date from the '70s or were written by authors too young to have been GPO subscribers back then.
It would facilitate that. The further apart that OpenReach is from whoever you deal with the less the ability of that whoever to be forewarned and to pass on the warning.
It's bad enough already. One afternoon some months ago phone and broadband kept going down. I tried ringing BT to ask if they knew there was any work going on in the area. No there wasn't. They could arrange a call-out but it would coast £80 if there was nothing wrong. Rather than do that I went down to the village where the cabinets are. Two manholes with the covers off, each occupied by a guy sorting out connections which they told me were no in great condition. Essential work, the only thing wrong was lack of communication (yes, the irony) back to customer disservice and hence to the customer. If things are to be broken up there needs to be a real effort on communicating this sort of thing all the way to the customer.
"ou do realise that the people have been waiting 3 years for their will to be respected?"
Which will was that? The will of the more or less half that wanted to leave or that of the more or less half who didn't?
The impasse of the last few years has been the consequence of the fact that you need a decisive majority for a change that fundamental, say something like 2:1. Apart from the gung-ho ERG types I suspect most of the rest of the MPs are looking over their shoulders at the electoral consequences of a disrupted economy.
"privatisation was a political decision"
The political aspect came in when the privatised BT was not allowed to move into cable. That it, not until the supposedly more commercial businesses had shown their commercialism in the extent to which they were going to limit their efforts to cherry picked areas. The BT was brought in late and more or less simultaneously berated for not having the universal fibre network it had been forbidden to build.
"the plan is to provide FTTP for every home"
The headline word is "broadband". Even if anything else is babbled you'd probably find that ADSL counts as broad band and if you wait in the queue you can be connected up in a couple of years time and use it 3 days a week.
I live in a rural area. The other day someone from OpenReach came to the door surveying for FTTP. I pointed out where the existing, buried, phone line comes into the premises along the longest diagonal - in addition to the original retaining wall it runs under a hedge, some fruit tree roots, the greenhouse, the concrete drive and the concrete laid paving stones before coming through the 2' wide concrete foundations. As I'd downloaded both 32 and 64 bit Devuan DVD imagess via the FTTC connection just before he arrived I felt able to resist his offer of overhead FTTP and whatever extra costs it would have meant.
When your "slower" is quite fast enough for purpose I'm not going to throw away good money on something that produces no effective improvement.
One of the great myths of finance is that growth should be expected to go on for ever. It doesn't. Every new market looks as if it's taking off exponentially. It isn't. It's sigmoidal. If you're dealing with something consumable it'll flatten out at a fixed level of consumption. If you're dealing with something durable it flattens out at a given level of installed base; sales are the first differential of the installed base.
Expect the market to saturate. For consumables it's at a highish level which is why HP is keen on making the most out of ink and really in trouble if it can't make the most of the market. For durables it's basically replacement plus what can be squeezed out of the market with "upgrades" and "enhancements". That doesn't mean they're dinosaurs, it just means that the market's matured, just like you should have expected.