"but seriously, El Reg?"
Look through the recent articles on GDPR and have a good think about how this might relate to them. Hint: medical info tied to person's name is PII - Personally Indentifiable Information.
33045 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
ITAR (arms regulations) restrictions come with heavy penalties. ... the "COO" was trying to outsource everything he could
I reckon company policies, manuals etc. should always accompany statements of "this is what we do and how we do it" with "this is why we do it and why we do it this way" so that it can be pointed out to even the meanest intelligence in senior management when it's done that way because of statutory or regulatory reasons.
A bit of negotiation.
Assagne surrenders to the warrant.
Taken straight to the magistrates' court for an immediate hearing.
Pleads guilty.
Prosecution points out that bail jumping is a serious matter so imprisonment is fully justified but as the original warrant has been dropped, he's spent the time on bail under what's effectively self-imposed house arrest, has voluntarily surrendered and has agreed to leave the country immediately if set free the Crown believes the imprisonment could be suspended. Say six months for two years you worship?
Defence confirms intent to leave but counters saying a conditional discharge would be appropriate.
Court imposes 5 months suspended two years.
In and out of court in five minutes
Fast car to Heathrow timed to arrive just in time to catch a flight to Ecuador leaving the US no time to get extradition papers prepared and Swedes no time to reissue the EWA.
That's if he keeps his mouth shut except to confirm his name and plead guilty. If he tries to make a speech in court he gets 14 days and there'll be an extradition warrant and an EWA waiting when he gets out. Likewise if he tries to hold a press conference after leaving court the car gets held up in traffic and he misses his plane and finds there's no available seat for several days.
"Why is this man so special?"
I'm sure if you were to ask him he'd tell you at length.
"(I'm not commenting on Assange, his personality ... just the fact that the UK government seem to be spending a disproportionate amount of money on this)"
His personality is the key; he's a self-publicist. Letting up on him would be very public and would send the message that bail jumping isn't actually something you can get banged up for. He really has brought this on himself.
Maybe his option would be to come out, get arrested and get a shrink to persuade the court he's unfit to plead. His past behaviour might be called in evidence to support it but I don't suppose it would sit well with his ego.
"As much as I dislike arseange I disagree with him getting arrested and shipped off to land of the free."
At the time he skipped bail the US didn't appear to be thinking of extraditing him and if they'd put in a request they'd have been queued up behind Sweden. The US might well have thought that ignoring him would have hurt his ego so much as to have been the more effective punishment. Now, possibly with Assagne's help, the current POTUS lacks that degree of subtlety.
AFAICS Assagne's situation is entirely of his own making. Or, to put it another way, he's made his bed sofa and now he must lie sit on it.
"Books and scientific publications come with an ERRATA sheet and I think it is good, because honest."
Agreed. But the problem is the ready acceptance that they should be needed, particularly in this context. Would it not be better if development effort were concentrated on fixing the errata so as to eliminate them rather than adding more features which in turn add more errors?
It isn't just age and it isn't just computers which puzzle neophytes.
Every year the botany course had a few weeks on palaeoecology. Strictly speaking I shouldn't have been helping on an undergrad course but it was so specialised that only SWMBO from the regular demonstrating team had the relevant background.
It must have been the first time the students had needed to use high resolution microscopy so they were shown how to set up the Kohler illumination to maximise resolution. But every time we were called over to a student's microscope to help identify a pollen grain we had to set it up properly before talking them through the identification and yet the students couldn't see how bad it was.
Of course that generation of students is now in the age group in the article.or thereabouts.
"Back at school in NZ we had little orange bound books of log tables"
That takes us back full circles (and to old jokes about snake breeding). Babbage's inspiration was the need to improve the calculation of tables because there were too many errors in those of his day.
"The labels of bags of donated bloods are still hand written... the label may have to be readable by candle light."
It depends on the hand. Mine might not be safe in any light. I'd have thought a printed label would have been better.
"The computer age for normal people started around about 1990."
As a domestic, single user device, maybe. But many normal people were sitting at green screens (or orange ones if you wanted to be ergonomic) in offices well before then. Before that they'd maybe have been filling in sheets for data entry clerks to enter into punch cards and getting computer-printed pay slips.
"Those over 75, and there's a few of those left too, may have decided at the time that this was a young person's thing and they'd give it a miss."
I'm not quite 75 yet but by the time the first practical micro-driven devices came out, say late '70s. I was in my 40s. Well before the teenagers were playing with their Spectra of C64s I could see just what this could do for lab instrumentation when there wasn't a budget for PDPs or Novas and setting them to work.
The computer age began well before you think.
"There aren't that many left alive."
That reminds me, The Times last weekend carried an obit. of Tim Berners-Lee's mother who seems to have had in interesting computing career of her own back in the earlyish days. It's a pity el Reg didn't pick up on that.
Many pensioners will have spent part of their working lives using various terminal-based applications during their working lives*. They would be able to run rings round mouse jockeys doing such work because not taking a hand off the keyboard to wiggle a mouse is a big productivity gain**. They had various key operations to control the terminal instead of the mouse.
They can't bring that experience to bear on working on a GUI because although there may be keyboard shortcuts the computer can't adapt to using the key control sets they're used to.
Who's being dumb here?
* For my part, I spent part of my working life writing some of those applications.
** It might gain them RSI but that's a different issue.
"the look of joy on someones face when they discover something"
Back in the early days of the OU I was a tutor/counsellor for the Science Foundation course covering most points west of the Bann. One part of the chemistry section had a computer assisted learning element which involved me dragging a portable (so much for relativity) teletype and an acoustically coupled modem out to the tutorial centre.
One of my students was a nurse tutor (much younger then than I am now but the OU in thise days worked on the basis that the students were a good bit older than the tutors). She was so nervous that she brought her teenage son along for moral support. In the course of the morning it just dawned on her that this was really straightforward and nothing to worry about at all. Yup, that was what it was all about.
"Gas lighting was the new thing"
Errr. How old do you think the oldest people still alive are? Pushing towards the second century?
Gas lighting still having been a thing, however, is quite realistic. We had gas lighting in the house I grew up in until we moved just before I was 14.
"The concept takes seconds to learn and the co-ordination little longer. I don't buy this whole pensioners don't have the experience line. Its basic hand-eye co-ordination."
Agreed. It's simply assuming that the person knows what's the actual link between what the hand does and the eye sees.
As with all jargon it's a necessary short cut to say "click on icon". Even "click the mouse on the icon" is too long-winded. But if someone doesn't know it's necessary to explain that "when I say 'click on the icon' move the mouse like this so that this pointer on the screen moved over that thing there which is the icon and then press that button which makes a clicking sound". Not difficult to have to say once, easily understood thereafter but there does, in the article appear to a big cognitive gap. The gap is in the instructor and it relates to the need to explain that.
"Really? Every time I go back to my folks I have to show one of them where the button for X is on the remote"
My problem is usually finding the right remote for X. There's the TV itself, the Mythbox and the Kodi (what a crap user interface that has - every single one of them) on the Pi.
"Pensioners back in 2002 were quite unlikely to have any experience whatsoever with anything even vaguely resembling moving an object around on a surface and relating that to something moving around on a screen."
Apart from playing Pong & its derivatives in the pub about quarter of a century earlier?
"I wouldn't blame the user. I'd rather say it's the user interface that is under-developed."
It's not even the user interface to blame. Just whoever should have but didn't explain the relationship between mouse and screen.
Back in the day if you bought a Windows computer there'd have been a big manual explaining this stuff. Nowadays it's just assumed the user will have used something similar before or will have seen it being used. When that assumption fails - and it's the assumption, not the user - then someone needs to fill the gap.
Maybe teacher training has improved since the days I endured its products but I've long believed that subjects are taught by people with an aptitude for the subject (OK, not when ICT gets foisted on them) and as a consequence they're unable to understand and compensate for the difficulties experienced by most of their pupils or even the basic lack of knowledge.
"I'm imagining that some data resolves more sharply seen edge-on but other data is from tracking changes across wide areas."
Disk view, you're looking straight down and get a plan view of all the layers at once.
Limb, you see a cross section.
At least, that's how I'd expect it to be working
"the grinding lab probably forgot to stress relieve the lens"
Glass can have lots of internal stresses. For my degree project I devised an experiment which required a number of stands made out of glass rod with 6 bends in each (think of those Bauhaus tubular frames chairs and you get the idea). Over a few weeks each of the initial bunch made out of soda glass developed cracks at at least one joint. They had to be remade in Pyrex.
"It started with the Industrial Revolution, the pretext for which was, in essence, better living through mass production, both in terms of better employment opportunities and more diverse, cheaper yet better goods. In reality, the motive was warfare"
A large part of the industrial revolution was in the textile industry. I suppose they could have been mass producing cushions to smother the enemy.
Technology moving faster than common sense. All sorts of wireless interfaces added to something that really needs a minimally small attack area just so some numpty with a new car and a smartphone can sit in the pub and say "hi, guys, just look at this".
"Then again maybe this is just the first stage of that process."
That was my immediate reaction to the article. Once they've been suckered in with the low prices start adding tax to the power consumed for charging so that as tax on petrol and diesel goes down the tax on charging goes up.
"How resistant are NAS boxes to Ransomeware attacks?"
What's an NAS box? Serious question.
If your idea of an NAS box is just something that serves up a directory exposed in your file system with all the semantics of a normal disk then it's not going to be resistant at all. Ransomware sees files on a drive, ransomware encrypts them.
OTOH if its something like Nextcloud which operates by WebDAV then ransomware sees files, encrypts them and writes them back alongside the originals. The V in WebDAV stands for versioning. Ditto if, as someone else points out,the box uses ZFS and takes advantage of snapshotting.