Re: 20 Years Ago
Reading obviously. Spammers and spanners are two different things.
40413 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
I can answer that one: a combination of both.
We had the new Y2K system set up to cut over for Jan 1. It was a new pair of boxes because the hot standby for the old main box couldn't run the Y2K version of the database.
Because the year end accounts still had to be finalised the client's accountants insisted the old system had to be kept going for a couple of weeks whilst they finalised did that. So for a couple of weeks the non-Y2K system was crapping all over new orders and the vendors dialling in on a daily basis to fix the problems.
I don't know why they didn't let us move operations over to the new box and let the accountants play with the old one. If they'd given me some notice that they wanted to do that I could have arranged to bring over data on work completed in January, if that's what was needed and set the clock back to 31 Dec every day or some similar fudge.
"Seriously, what if your house was on fire and your wife was inside and couldn't get to a window?"
Internal mechanical over-ride. Panic bar, panic button whatever you want to call it. Fail to locked is secure. Mechanical override is safety. Both are basic requirements.
Similar to my car's automatic headlights. Yes they do always switch on when it's actually night or nearly so. But they'll also come on during bright sunshine. Or going under a bridge. OTOH on a dark day driving along a long lane with an overhanging tree canopy they remained resolutely off. And then there's the allegedly self-dipping electronic mirror.
"I've now arranged to get a better boiler fitted by our regular gas-safe plumber for £1500 less than BG's quote."
And he'll undoubtedly do a better deal on servicing than the extended warranty the makers will try to foist on you no matter how many times you return their letter-box litter as unwanted junk.
Great respect for the guys who live jointed the faulty 3-phase in our road a few months ago; that would rate at a huge amount more than 10A. About 12Ω showing in the neutral. It buts onto the section that was replaced with similar problems a few years ago. I think the entire cable is being replaced in 12 metres stages.
"I'm sure this is where some other commentard is gonna tell me of just such a file system!"
Not such a file system but certainly such a system. Open/NextCloud keeps versioned files (it's the V in WebDAV) and there are a couple of server side apps that claim to detect such behaviour.
But that's a client-server system. Maybe what we need is a new architecture that fits that into one box. Your user-facing WP, spreadsheet or whatever doesn't directly read and write files but asks for such services from the server. Maybe two VMs would be enough to run client and server or, for the truly paranoid sensibly security minded, two separate processors. For added security the formats of the updated files could be checked before being saved.
"I and many of my fellow English people are fine with Scottish independence because we are sick and tired of hearing about it."
The whole of the UK should have been given the vote but I suppose the result would have looked like being thrown out and that wouldn't have suited the wee man's ego.
"So you'd like to pay for your driving per-mile"
I'd like what I pay for in car tax on a flat fee basis and indirectly on a per-mile basis in fuel tax to be spent on roads. I have no doubt whatsoever that if any government introduced per-mile charges it would be additional to the other transport taxes.
"Having an infrastructure provider as Network Rail in public hands where private operators compete on is a good thing. Whether you agree that Train Operating Companies should be private or public is another matter. I see very few people debate that Network Rail should be privatised too.
Why not replicate the set up for rail similar to that for broadband?"
Why not? Because having the rail infrastructure separate from the operators gives the former no incentive to do a good job and denies the latter the means to do so. It was an arrangement guaranteed to produce little improvement on BR days. That's why not.
"not like it was done."
Certainly not.
We had companies paying to run shortish term franchises over infrastructure somebody else owned and ran. And I never did find out who owned and ran the station whose employee was still trying to find my pre-booked ticket and still had to sell me a car park ticket whilst the train was pulling into the station. I arrived by car about 15 minutes later than if I'd taken the train and would have been a good deal earlier than that if I hadn't bothered with the train at all.
Hmm. I wonder how old the text books and/or their authors were. By the late '80s the difference between the black telephone rationing company and the privatised BT were becoming obvious. Either the books date from the '70s or were written by authors too young to have been GPO subscribers back then.
It would facilitate that. The further apart that OpenReach is from whoever you deal with the less the ability of that whoever to be forewarned and to pass on the warning.
It's bad enough already. One afternoon some months ago phone and broadband kept going down. I tried ringing BT to ask if they knew there was any work going on in the area. No there wasn't. They could arrange a call-out but it would coast £80 if there was nothing wrong. Rather than do that I went down to the village where the cabinets are. Two manholes with the covers off, each occupied by a guy sorting out connections which they told me were no in great condition. Essential work, the only thing wrong was lack of communication (yes, the irony) back to customer disservice and hence to the customer. If things are to be broken up there needs to be a real effort on communicating this sort of thing all the way to the customer.
"ou do realise that the people have been waiting 3 years for their will to be respected?"
Which will was that? The will of the more or less half that wanted to leave or that of the more or less half who didn't?
The impasse of the last few years has been the consequence of the fact that you need a decisive majority for a change that fundamental, say something like 2:1. Apart from the gung-ho ERG types I suspect most of the rest of the MPs are looking over their shoulders at the electoral consequences of a disrupted economy.
"privatisation was a political decision"
The political aspect came in when the privatised BT was not allowed to move into cable. That it, not until the supposedly more commercial businesses had shown their commercialism in the extent to which they were going to limit their efforts to cherry picked areas. The BT was brought in late and more or less simultaneously berated for not having the universal fibre network it had been forbidden to build.
"the plan is to provide FTTP for every home"
The headline word is "broadband". Even if anything else is babbled you'd probably find that ADSL counts as broad band and if you wait in the queue you can be connected up in a couple of years time and use it 3 days a week.