Re: Reputation
"Teslas on autopilot must miss things well over 32000 times per day but that almost never appears on the news."
Non Teslas drivenby humans miss things many, many more times than that. That's not on the news either.
40413 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"At least in this case people know how bad Coronoavirus can be."
I don't think we do - which adds more weight to your argument of course.
Research is just starting on the extent to which there can be long term damage to people who think they had it lightly. It's going to make assessing the overall consequence more difficult. HMG have just revised their death toll estimates by putting a 28 day limit in place having realised that under the previous methodology someone previously diagnosed but dying from a road accident would have been counted. But now it's looking possible that damage to various organs could contribute to death some years down the line.
Tricky things, rights. Really they're nothing more than pre-negotiated agreements as to how we all behave to each other.
One corollary of that is that they have to apply all round. So if X has the right to post that 5G caused Coronavirus-19 then Y has the right to post evidence that X's post was bollocks. X can't then argue that Y shouldn't have that right without arguing that they don't have it themselves.
Another corollary is that as soon as there are multiple rights is that there's a possibility of conflict and precedence is needed to sort them out. We usually put the right to life first so freedom of speech has to take a lower precedence.
One of the consequences of Thalidomide, of course, is that clinical trials have become more rigorous. If things didn't move on in medicine and epidemiology we'd still be catching and dying from the plague from rat fleas, cholera from dirty water, smallpox from each other and dying from numerous bacterial infections.
"I've had Corona"
Was that diagnosed with a specific test* or was it just some unspecified upper respiratory tract infection?
Assuming you genuinely did have it how many (obviously unvaccinated) people did you pass it onto? How many more got it passed on indirectly? How many of those did you indirectly kill?
"I've had Corona" isn't a straightforward statement to make for anyone. Unless they isolated themselves before becoming infected they must realise that there's an ongoing chain of infections extending before them and that people could be dying from what they unwittingly passed on. I'd have expected that the one thing anyone in that position, who thinks the thing through and has any trace of conscience would support anything that breaks that chain.
* And if you don't trust science how would you know that the test was right? Or even that the virus exists?
When they're using unit tests a good approach would be if it's an aspect of behaviour that's not covered by a unit test don't rely on it*. So did the early unit tests specifically check for nulls being allowed in primaries?
* A consequence is that future unit tests shouldn't specifically contradict the specific expectation of an earlier test.
"There are approximately 640 times more lines of code devoted to tests than there are in the database engine itself."
Who tests the testers?
With that degree of excess I'd hope that some of those LOC are there to test the tests of the engine and that some are there to test the tests of the tests...
"they took one look at this ruffian clutching a supermarket carrier bag"
One of the best - and truest - lines in LOTSW was along those lines. The scruffs were wandering through a car showroom. One salesman to another: "Shall I throw them out?" "Nay lad, round here they can look like that and be millionaires."
On seeing the headline I wondered that. From what I understand of the report it wasn't a court decision in the first place, just an agreement with a Govt department who was trusting enough to to put in that provision originally.
Perhaps the better option now would have been to just break it up without the option on the basis that now the conditions have been breached the benefits can't possibly exist. Apart from anything else it would terrify the others.
"both the local and BBC sites covered some of them them. Today neither of them does"
So the local paper doesn't have the Beeb as competition any more. If it wanted to invest in building up its local reporting it could do so.
I suspect the malaise of local press is more that it isn't local any more. Many of the local papers got bought up by national chains that had no local focus.
"local press particularly hard hit and virtually out of business in some parts of the UK. I don't believe that Google is the primary cause of this"
Quite.
Taking "press" literally the problem is delivery networks. Our local newspaper shop can't get kids to deliver to us any more and I'm not trailing all that way every day just to get a paper.
Online they totally disregarded GDPR with needing to provide 100+ opt-outs every time you went online, one of the many reasons why I have one browser set up in amnesiac mode.
Since then things have got worse as, with so many in the group their domain is $OLD_TITLElive.co.uk and, amid the mess that's now its UI, persists in wanting to throw at me local stories from all over the place except here.