Re: £42 billion and 38,000 skilled jobs
I was thinking more about the 2035 target date. Safely in the future - nobody in government today will be there to be held to it, even if anyone remembers.
33022 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
What would raise eyebrows would be comparing the spec of the laptop with that of servers one which we used in the past to support the database and the applications served over terminals to multiple users. A Pi will have more memory than those old boxes did. These days it's not the basic task that's the problem, it's the bloat.
My boss at the time who, despite being an accountant, was quite reasonable, was having a dispute with one of the unreasonable accountants*. His exasperation surfaced as "This business has a surplus of accountants!". Ever since I've regarded that as the correct collective noun.
* I sometimes described this one as going into cannon mode. His first reaction to any problem was to want to fire someone.
There's a very simple answer to this. Their experts should provide a proof of concept implementation and then let everyone else pick it apart.
The criteria for success would be:
- It should not present a risk to that vast majority of internet users who are going about their lawful business
- It should not present a risk to those living under a repressive regime
- It should not present a risk to those, including but not limited t, children, living in abusive relationships seeking help
- It should not present a risk to whistleblowers seeking to draw attention to some illegal activity
- It should not present a risk to journalists working in hostile environments, including those working undercover
- It should not be open to abuse by unauthorised use or access by authorised users, including, but not limited to, Cheshire police intelligence (sic) analysts
If these experts can provide a robust practice demonstration of this they will have made their point, otherwise they, like the rest of us, should think of the children public at large.
"SOFCs are more efficient than gas turbine generators, and the transmisson loss from on-site generators will be minimal compared to power coming from the grid."
Where does the hydrogen come from? If it's from electrolysis you have to consider the transmission losses to the electrolysis plant and the electrolysis itself. Where is the electrolysis plant? if it isn't on-site you have to factor in the energy needed to pump it and, hydrogen being hydrogen, the losses from the joints in the pipework, the replacement of the pipework due to embrittlement etc. If the plant is on-site the transmission losses are the same as you'd have had powering the data centre direct plus an addition to the second order effect of transmission losses incurred in transmitting the energy that's lost in the course of hydrolysis.
If a fuel cell facility helps stabilize the grid then surely this is a matter for the grid operator rather than a grid customer.
"powered initially by gas, moving to hydrogen in future."
Leaving aside the fact that hydrogen is also a gas, powering the fuel cell by natural gas, i.e. methane, is hardly decarbonising the operation compared to using the same gas to fuel a gas turbine-driven generator. The significant question is how is the long-term hydrogen to be obtained? If that involves simply transferring electrical energy from some other source into chemical energy in the form of H2 why not use that electrical energy directly?
Fuel cells and hydrogen make sense (give or take the difficulties of handling hydrogen) where the energy is to be deployed in situations which are intrinsically disconnected from the grid such as vehicles. The only point I can see for a static installation such as a data centre is green-washing.
It's not necessarily lack of staff training that's the problem. The staff training might have included extracting data into a spreadsheet. The underlying problem is more likely to be lack of a proper procedure as in Mike 137's post and insistence on a format that precludes any hidden content that might escape initial inspection.
Our statistics class was more or less similar. We handled it be turning up a bit later each week so he also turned up a bit later. Then we turned up on time and he wasn't there so we left for good.
Doing research the best way to use statistics was to call on a statistician for advice. Rather like encryption, if you're not a specialist don't try to roll your own.