Re: Never mind
So it's just a coincidence that figures show that when lockdown started earlier in the year R fell abruptly and started to climb gradually as it was eased in steps? What was that about "fuck facts"?
40558 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Based on every I read and hear from the UK, there is no second wave, it is still in the ups and downs of the first wave."
I think this is a reasonable interpretation. Apply various mitigation measures, R goes down, disapply them R goes up. In this context "waves" seem to be more PR than anything else. AFAICS what's happening is that the govt. is trying to apply such measures and work out which have least adverse economic and political effects. The feedback from any change is sufficiently delayed that the level of infections will go up and down.
Its only a matter of time before someone starts looking at working from home as "transferring a part of the business to a residential address".
Just acting on government instructions. They can be referred to Michael Gove if they want to argue.
"it appears the consultancy wanted to demonstrate to youngsters how much money they could be making if they went for a career in IT (and, conveniently enough, consulting.)"
Hmmm.
If by "in consulting" you mean "working for a consultancy company" than that amount is going to be what the consultancy company makes whilst youngster gets paid minimal wage.
If you mean as freelance then things are better but don't forget that until the youngster's well enough established to get repeat business and new business by word of mouth there'll be a pimp agency taking a cut, general costs of running a business, such as an accountant and insurance, and HMRC trying to rip them off by pretending it's not actually a business they're running.
Be very careful what you wish for. You might get it.
Do you really want a BoJo, a Cummings, a Corbyn*, a Gove, a Rees-Mogg or any of the rest of the rogues gallery running the internet in the UK?
Various governments have wanted to get their hands on the net, usually via the ITU. Fortunately the ITU has managed to fend them off. Read about it by searching for el Reg's articles on it.
The existing governance might bot be ideal but there seem to be commentards here who want something worse. A lot worse.
* Under your idea it could have come to that.
Private companies are owned by their members. They must have an AGM at which members can vote. If a majority of the holders of membership voting rights choose to vote the old board out of office and vote in a replacement that's the end of the old board and all its policies. The board can dismiss company management including the CEO if they wish.
Unless one member controls most of the votes that's a long way away from being a dictatorship.
But don't let facts get in the way of an internet post.
As you say, it's answerable to its members and the members have an opportunity to vote on the board at the next AGM. They also have the right to propose their own candidates as replacements for the board. Of all the companies in the UK it's harder to think of any that have a better ability to get together online behind the managements back to do just that.
But should this really be a government function? On the whole I think that the less governments have their hands on the net the better.
"In general the older employees cost more and tended to be harder to control."
Certainly after a few trips round the (de)motivation course most people with a working brain recognise the BS for what it is. They also are experienced in whatever it is they do and don't really need control. The only people to whom this is a problem are those whose salaries and/or self-esteem depending on controlling them.
"Younger employees lack inexperience"
Oops"
"but they tend to have more energy and lower wages."
Energy is a trade-off with the efficiency that knowing the job brings and wages for them are a trade-off with the payments for the manglers whose sole role is to tell those who already know what they're doing what to do.
"If I were running a business with an aging workforce, I'd probably be tempted to swap them out too."
I wonder.....
"employer had decided at the last minute to *phone in* rather than show in person as required by the judge"
One judge I remember would probably have sent an officer of the court, accompanied by sufficient police as would have been needed, to bring him in to face a charge of contempt of court.
"The market, the whole market and nothing" but the market has been UK Govt mantra since the Adoration of the Blessed Maggie in 1979.
It might have escaped your notice but your favourite hate figure is the only UK prime minister we've ever had (one one of only a few ministers overall) with a STEM background.
"Why would ANYONE (never mind an enterprise customer) put up with network management via a third party cloud?"
Non-technical management. And as Cloud is the new shiny they may possibly believe this is a Good Thing. Maybe Netgear aren't as stupid as we think.
If it's a corporate purchase no PII would be needed.
If it's a new purchase was that term mentioned in the original specification? If so, buy somewhere else or if you've already bought learn to read specs more closely. If not it gets bundled straight back as not meeting specification.
If it's something that appears in a S/W upgrade to existing kit then read the licence terms very carefully and vote with your feet for future purposes, making sure your salesdroid knows that's what will happen.
"With everything moving to continuous integration and continuous delivery, point releases no longer make sense"
Point releases show that the grown-ups are still in charge. Nobody on the user side asked for continuous delivery.
"Come on people ... it is the current year."
Yes, but what current year? The year number only advances when there's a full year's worth of updates. ATM it's 2020.09.22. We didn't advance to 2021 on Jan 2nd, 2022 on Jan 3rd etc.
"the desktop has become a more iterative experience, a continuously developing thing which isn't necessarily bound by maintaining backwards compatibility."
Too true. Some of us like backwards compatibility in things like continuing to be usable, not chucking out functionality, not slurping data to a mother ship somewhere and not suddenly starting to show advertising. We also like backwards compatibility for the under-pinnings, the libraries which applications rely on to display on the desktop.
"the entire premise of the article is that sub numbers get confusing"
And that's the problem. They aren't. A major release should indicate a change sufficient as to not be backwards compatible and minor numbers should reflect minor changes. We've lived with 3-part numbers - 3.8.2 and the like - for a long time. We've come to understand what the increments are likely to mean.
It's throwing all that away that is confusing. Will a change from 137 to 138 be equivalent to 4.11.2 to 4.11.3 or 4.11.2 to 5.0 in old money? Will it signal a change of underlying GTK version?
I think Jake's put his finger on it - marketing's in charge.
"The problem with most IoT products isn't necessarily that they rely on back-end servers to run. It's that, for the most part, it's impossible to perceive the trajectory of a given company."
It's possible to make a reasonable estimate:
Does the operation of the server rely on continuing subscriptions?
If so then if the subscription operation is profitable it's likely to continue.
If not does it rely on the user as product?
If so then is that profitable? There are relatively few businesses that have succeeded. Even the past master at that model, Google, has a habit of discontinuing services. If it isn't profitable expect it to be shut down.
If it doesn't rely on a subscription or on user as product does it have some other income model?
If so, examine it carefully for credibility.
If not does it rely on burning through investors' money to run it?
If so expect it to be shut down once that's all burned.
If not it's dependent on sales of devices to keep it going. Once those fall off expect it to be shut down.
Such a system would hold PII about court staff in general as well a judges. This should be rate as particularly sensitive as at any one time there will be a number of toe-rags who'd quite like to pressure someone in that position. I hope this will be taken into account when awarding the contract but suspect not.
I'm not sure any additional legislation would be needed. Just make sure that information is only used for the purposes for which it was collected, kept securely and for no longer than necessary for the original purpose.
All it needs is somebody in charge who understands this and has the ability and determination to ensure that it's adhered to.
"rarely had anyone on the staff who could read it"
OTOH it could be quite handy for the vendor if the customer had someone available to debug the code. After having had two Friday lunchtimes interrupted when the weekly billing run exploded I spent an afternoon drilling down and found, buried several loops deep, a statement asking the server to allocate an object which wasn't released so the server process grew until it reached its maximum memory allocation. Followed by a phone call - not the last - to the vendor to tell them how to write software for that particular RDBMS.
Had a similar experience at a client where two directors had one of their stand-up rows in the main office in front of their staff and several of us freelancers* about which way the application should make up production batches. This wasn't resolved.
A colleague wrote a work of art solution where every possible parameter affecting batching was held in the database with a big data-entry form so the operators could set it up in whatever way they were told. We set up some reasonable looking values before it went live and as far as I know they were never changed.
* Obviously their frequent toys out of the pram events were one of the facets of face-to-face communication, team integration & what-not that you miss when everyone's working from home.
Nildram, swallowed by Pipex (who decided to roll out Nildram support to their existing customer base because it was better than their own), swallowed by someone I can't remember (who rolled out their own appalling support because that's the sort of thing they did) swallowed by TalkTalk (who were TalkTalk)