Re: Not the first and won't be the last
Just in case somebody competent takes charge?
42400 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
In the upcoming local election set there's one for a mayor of West Yorks. Apparently there are a substantial list of candidates but i doubt there'll be an option for "No, I don't want one.". An even more stupid idea than "Krklees"; we probably have more in common with rural parts of Derbyshire than we do with Leeds, Bradford etc.
No spouse. The landlady had previously been cohabiting with the step-daughter's father on a nearby farm. He'd died so she seems to have taken the youngest of his legitimate daughters under her wing along with a few children ho had her own surname and who seem to have kept appearing whilst she was living with him. The census returns were under the premises old (pre-licence) name but it was sometimes styled as an inn although only licensed under the Beer Act.
It's amazing what you can turn up from a few census returns and tithe maps. It didn't initially appear to have been even tangentially related to the query originally being answered although it was and the whole turned into an article of > 12 pages.
"Anyone could request a new code for any address in the UK and then input whatever data they liked."
Familiarity with the historic census returns(from the usual genealogical suspects shows that although most answers are credible there were some who either did give whatever answers they liked or misunderstood questions.
One example I came across recently - the head of household said she was a beershop keeper and her almost* stepdaughter said she was an innkeeper's servant. Were the premises a beershop, a beerhouse or an inn?
* There seems to have been a lack of a marriage.
"An enterprising salesman took advantage of the problem to sell them more memory, and the fault reduced to once a day (they worked two shifts a day),"
That should have been a bit of a clue.
I managed to escape from a client's customer site in Italy when the server took a long enough gap between crashes. I was only there to install custom S/W I'd written but the flaky server kept crashing & they didn't want to let me go until "it" worked. I later heard that dodgy memory was replaced bu all I knew was that odd bits of memory kept getting dumped in files in lost+found. Apart from running out of money I had an appointment the next week for a meeting with new client. I needed to get away.
In my case you also got a lot of text spam.
If within weeks of buying a new car you start getting texts inviting you to some promotion to buy another it doesn't say much about their confidence. It slackened after I found the MD's email address but at the end of the services in warranty period I made it clear that I would do no more business with them on account of the spam. And they never did replace the handbrake lever which was the only fix for a broken button - a crap bit of injection moulded plastic* and the smallest replacement unit is the complete best part of a hundred quid piece of mechanism.
* Clearly internal stresses relieved by shattering as the two halves wouldn't fit back together.
"within a thousand years: the archaeologists will be competing with the industrialists to dig up the landfill sites"
Very likely mining will win.
"there will be no coal or oil they can reach by muscle power alone"
Back to charcoal. A society relying entirely on renewal resources will be more frugal.
My area of forensic science involved a lot of colour matching. Oddly enough nobody thought to make a check for this an obligatory part of recruitment until my office-mate & I raised it. One of my colleagues actually was R/G colour-blind but was senior enough to avoid that aspect.
When first married and living in a 2ndfloor attic flat (3rd floor for transpondians) we bought a bookcase at auction. A huge thing in solid oak. It came up to my shoulder and was 3 doors wide. The staircase was in 3 flights with 2 sharp corners to the first landing and the same again to our landing. It was ridiculous to think we could have got it up the stairs.
Several of us managed to do it, in fact it's been with us ever since & still has some white paint from the staircase embedded in the grain.
It wasn't that that put my back out. It was reaching round the rear wheel to the jack handle after a brake adjustment that did that
My immediate situation is that I've got 2 AGM notices. One is on paper and the other is an email stuffed full of links because they think their customers who pretty well have to do business online because branches are an endangered species won't be able to find their website unaided. Unfortunately I'd transferred the account concerned away from the paper-based lot as a result of bad customer service.
It's high time we saw the race to the bottom replaced by a race to the top..
Some of the worst offenders seem to be those who use a 3rd party agency set up as a sub-domain of the alleged sender. Pinging those reveals the truth but not many recipients are able to do that. An automated check and bounce would help. OK, it destroys a business model but it's essentially a parasitic one and if the choice were made between adding the spamming capacity in-house and not spamming it might, in effect, raise the cost of email as you suggest.
It would help if everyone were trained to follow a simple rule: do not click on a link or open an attachment in an unexpected/unsolicited email, even if you think you know who sent it. Trained on penalty of immediate dismissal for failure. Then train customers not to do so either because if you persist in sending emails with embedded links (yes, I'm looking at you, marketing) then, apart from the risk to the customers you've trained, it's very likely that you will indeed do that very thing.
On which topic, can anyone recommend a UK bank or building society that has the faintest clue about email security because mine has finally convinced me that they haven't and don't intend to get one.
"It's suggested this won't happen again"
What won't happen again?
This particular problem - maybe not now it's fixed unless, of course, somebody reverts to an older version or looks at the new code and thinks "That's not right for a child"?
Or developing against an insufficiently detailed spec that assumes culturally specific knowledge on behalf of the developer?
"Clearly welding extra money on phones for development of Android isn’t going to be favourable with users"
Go back to your 2nd paragraph. Android was and OS project before Google took it over - and they still have to make the kernel OS because of GPL. If the smartphone manufacturers had chosen to collaborate in developing it - as, for instance, Intel has with the kernel - they could have provided themselves with a GPL core. It would still have raised the problem of non-collaborating manufacturers trying to use it so they'd need to have added a non-GPL collaborative userland. Of course the costs would have been added to the purchase cost but spread out over many of millions of units and wouldn't favour one make over another.
TL:DR It didn't have to have turned out as it did.
There's an entirely different way of looking at this.
An OS is simply a part of a computing device. Without one the device is incomplete. A vendor can develop their own, buy it in or, as a middle way, develop one in collaboration with other vendors. Developing their own was, of course, the original way of doing things.
The OS can be supplied to the purchaser by various means. It could be licences as a one-off payment as part of the original package. It could be leased. It could be a mixture of initial payment with an optional support contract. It could be ad-supported. And, of course, the collaborative development approach* has enabled the free download of Linux and the BSDs inter alia.
It would have been feasible for smartphone manufacturers to have got together to develop a Linux distro which could have been provided to their customers as part of the one-off payment for the device. However Google has managed to divide and conquer them with its own Linux distro at the ongoing expense to their customers of eternal slurping.
*If you look carefully you'll find that H/W makers such as Intel contribute a lot of Linux development so in fact one-off payment as part of the the H/W applies even if you run some other OS. We Linux users thank you Windows users for your contributions.
How about we make that paying for a specific service such as email? In that case, yes. I pay for a domain and for someone to provide an email service for that domain. It gives me the freedom to choose not to use an ISP email address and hence to change ISP if I wish and also freedom from having my activity tracked by "free" email providers.
I need to have a gmail address as the system ID for my Android phone. It's actually a garbage address with no meaningful personal ID attached - and now Google seem to want me to provide its profile with a date of birth on "legal" grounds. The legality of that demand seems to be negative under GDPR.
"an old spare tower PC I had at the time, I ended up with a very expensive doorstop"
Almost by definition something that's old and spare is no longer expensive as you'd already written off its value. And if you'd kept the Windows distribution disk (or did you transfer the licence to another machine) you'd have been able to reinstall it.