"We haven't had anything you could call a Labor government since the seventies."
I'm not sure I'd call the present govt. Tory. One of the clown's first actions on gaining power was to turf out several who more clearly were conservatives.
42273 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Povlsen has invested a substantial sum in another space port in Shetland.
In that case that objection should be easily dealt with "if you don't object to mine I won't object to yours".
It reminds me of the time when a pub kept objecting to someone converting a house a couple of hundred yards or so away as a restaurant. The objections were based on the house not having any parking. Neither did the pub which was less than a hundred yards away from a cross roads with traffic lights and whose parking lines extended most of the way to the house. Surprisingly the would-be restaurateur gave up instead of making the obvious objection next time the pub's license renewal was due.
About 1990 the drives for HP disk cabinets (about a small USB stickfull in modern terms were huge and hugely heavy. There was a crane to ift them in and out which consisted of a steel bar that fitted over the cabinets and a sling with a pulley system to lift the drives. Same job but portable enough for the field engineers to bring with them instead of having to have one permanently on site but they did look a bit dodgy in use.
"find out who's siphoning diesel out of the storage tank."
I'd never thought of this aspect before but is generator diesel marked in the same way as agricultural "red diesel"? If so a quiet call to HMRC and a spot check on the offender's tank's content might save the need for involving the CEO.
"unless it is an extreme case involving them making you brave blizzards and dodgy moorland roads."
My last gigs before hanging up the invoice book for good did indeed commuting over a dodgy moorland road with occasional blizzards. Not that visibility of about three metres would stop some idiot Merc driver overtaking.
Encrochat and ANOM's predecessor, Phantom Secure, started off as, shall we say, independent efforts. Their getting compromised could have been put down to bad luck and hoped for better next time. Now that criminals have been told explicitly that such off the shelf systems can't be trusted individual gangs might start commissioning their own. That introduces its own trust problems of course but assuming many of them aren't a multiplicity of small networks are going to yield much less reward for the effort needed to break into them.
The alternative is that they simply move to using mainstream end-to-end systems giving even more weight to calls for these to be backdoored. The ongoing existence of separate criminal systems should really be an argument against the Patels of this world demanding that the rest of us shouldn't have secure communications for out legitimate day-to-day lives.
How cynical is it to wonder if these public pronouncements are an attempt to bring that situation about?
Questioning the betters is fine. It requires recognising the betters, recognising why they are the betters and why the answers they give are more likely to be right than the opinions of some eejit they found on the net who can't tell the difference between biology and telecommunications technologies.
We also have our own coronaviruses which have evolved along with us. In prehistory with small human populations with little contact between groups a newly species-hopped virus that was lethal would be unlikely to propagate far unless it evolved. In other words there would have been effective selection pressure in the past.
What's new about this one is that it's hit us when we've got large, densely packed population centres with large-scale fast travel between them. We need to find a new way of exerting selection pressure and vaccination is one way of doing that.
You're mixing up spacing of glyphs with their size. Courier may have its glyphs in similar sizes but printing them readably depends on the spacing being more or less right which a recalcitrant printer might not bother with, especially if it realises that Mr Dabbs is the user victim.
It was an occasional occurrence at the biological suppliers where I once worked. It was based in an old Victorian villa & there'd a few escapes of rats which had bred. Hollow walls, hollow floors - plenty of spaces for them.
There was a mitigating factor. One of the managers, in charge of preparing microscope specimens for schools, stayed behind one night with an air-gun and shot one. Realising that it had a good chance of being infected with trypanosomes which would give him a batch of slides he went off to get a syringe. When he came back the body had been dragged away, presumably to be eaten by the other rats.
Even if the ploy was running out of time there's no excuse for publicising it like this. Far better to have said "brilliant operation by our agents to break into what was a secure system" etc. In the mean time set the guy up producing the next generation product.
Unless, of course it was really a break in and the dev being thrown to the wolves was singularly uncooperative and they're taking revenge.
One evening, long ago, when men were men and the University computers were made by ICL and had model numbers starting with 19, I was sitting the at a card punch when one of the staff came through taking a conducted tour of the computer centre so I tagged along. We went down into the computer room. Slightly embarrassed member of staff discovered the box (at least 6 foot high) whose door he opened wasn't the CPU, just some of the memory and thought the engineers must have rearranged them.
I remember reading, a long time ago, that the function of a Unix kernel* was to provide an illusion of place and an illusion of process**. Some people seem unable to perceive these illusions. I don't think it helps that modern UI (and that includes web) designers seem to go out their way to conceal them. UX designers, of course, are amongst those who don't perceive the illusions at all.
* Other OS kernels are also available
** The reality, of course, is a scatter of segments on a disk and slices of time on a CPU
Maybe where other monitors display "no signal" it should display "this is a monitor, not an iMac".
Maybe something like this should be the standard message on all monitors. "No signal" is a message tor techies who would just as easily understand the significance of the luser version: "If you can see this message you haven't switched your computer on. This screen is only your monitor. If you're not sure what your computer looks like follow the cable coming out of the back of the monitor and it should be on the other end. Not the cable that leads to the power socket, the other one."
7. Use in production.
It's only in 7, and even then only at large scale that rare, sporadic failures become recognisable. Even if you were lucky enough to catch one at the previous stages you wouldn't be able to reproduce it reliably enough to understand it.