Re: Boring Bankers... Not
"the boardroom table"
Always a safer bet than the copying machine...
42398 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
It was fairly foolhardy of him with his job and maybe marriage on the line to say nothing of recriminations from the other party and whatever reaction her husband might have had. You might have just said you'd take it to a tribunal without naming your price and giving yourself a chance to see how high he was prepared to bid or, worse still for him, just taking it the tribunal anyway.
A fairly new member of staff was being observant. At close of play he pointed out a girl from the office and a bloke from IIRC, the factory walking across the car park.
"Have you noticed they always leave together every night?"
"Yes. Well they are married."
The shared surname should have been a clue.
AFAICS he was dead right. If White Box had still been on the go and Scientific Linux hadn't been winding down maintaining their own build in favour of CentOS the abrupt EoL wouldn't have mattered very much; Red Hat might not even have pulled the move at all. Now we're back to multiple RHEL equivalents anyone who wants to go down that path knows that they have some assurance that the rug can't be pulled out from under them that easily now.
"Food is made from dirt."
To be pedantic, it's grown in soil or fed from stuff that's grown in soil. Only a small proportion of it is actually derived from a component of the soil (apart from the water which was only passing through). I've never understood why the uppermost geological layer gets called dirt.
That statement struck an entirely false note with me. Glass, when it's not recycled, is made from sand - silicon dioxide, not neat silicon. I doubt the the glass-making industry and wafer producing industries have many steps in common other than sourcing sand. Is he telling us there's a world shortage of sand?
Interesting. In my case it was the opposite. No promotion to PSO without "responsibility" which meant managerial responsibility for which there was little scope. Giving evidence that might help convict someone of murder or clear them of the charge wasn't "responsibility".
As it was a specialised skill set with little scope outside they thought they could get away with it. Because I had the opportunity to diversify into IT I managed to escape. The effect of someone contriving that was electric if not unprecedented. The response to my resignation was an almost immediate offer of PSO with no board or any other formalities despite having been yet again refused in the previous year. I'd hoped it would at least have made things easier for others but I later heard it didn't.
The other consequence of truncated technical pay scales is that it's assumed that the reward for succeeding in IT (or whatever it might be) will be to be promoted to a managerial scale. This ignores the fact that management is - properly - a skill in it's own right and quite a rare one at that. It makes as much sense as promoting an IT specialist to chemical engineer or vice versa. This is why we have so many abysmal managers that manglement is the most apt term for them.
The duplicate hardware has been exposed to the space environment for an equally long time so there's no guarantee that it's in any better condition nor how long it's going to remain working if it is. It will be a sad day if it does prove to be the end. Fingers crossed.
It's worth adding these two paragraphs from the 2017 report from linuxfoundation.org on Linux Kernel development, the latest I could find. They cover the period of kernel development cycles 4.8 to 4.13
The top 10 contributors, including the groups “unknown” and “none,” make up just over 54 percent of the total contributions to the kernel; that is up slightly from the previous version of this report. It is worth noting that, even if one assumes that all of the “unknown” contributors are working on their own time, well over 85 percent of all kernel development is demonstrably done by developers who are being paid for their work.
Interestingly, the volume of contributions from unpaid developers has been in slow decline for many years. It was 14.6 percent in the 2012 version of this report, but is 8.2 percent this time around. There are many possible reasons for this decline, but, arguably, the most plausible of those is quite simple: kernel developers are in short supply, so anybody who demonstrates an ability to get code into the mainline tends not to have trouble finding job offers. Indeed, the bigger problem can be fending those offers off. As a result, volunteer developers tend not to stay that way for long.
The top contributor was Intel with 13.1% of changes. The next was the entire body of contributors with no affiliation at 8.2%. Red Hat was 3rd with 7.2% IBM was 6th with 4.1% - if those were taken together to reflect the subsequent merger they'd be the 2nd largest. Looking down the list there are, as expected, other S/W businesses - including Oracle with 1.7% but a lot are actually hardware manufacturers.
The foundation also produced a report on 2020 contributors to FOSS in general. The most (just) common motivation given was "I use this piece of FOSS and needed the specific features/fixes I added".
"The truth is that simply put contributors to open source projects are not being compensated."
Do you really think that all those developers working for Intel, Google Red Hat/IBM etc whose contributions make up the bulk of Linux aren't being paid? Truth? Really?
And that word "compensation"? That's the sort of PR-speak that tells us that the modest sums being given to CEOs and the like is compensation for their distasteful labours. Most people are paid to do a job.
If you mean "compensated" in the wider sense then those who have some particular need that isn't being met by existing software, or at least by anything they can afford, get together to produce their own solution, then they are being compensated. They're being compensated by getting what they wanted in the first place.
On the basis of pollen analysis etc. of a sample from a body I could easily identify the ecological situation where the body had been hidden. After an hour or more's flying over S Armagh by chopper I still couldn't spot a single such location.
This stuff isn't as easy as people like to make out.
"If the keys were in a standard layout, just ortholinear then maybe"
I have a miniature one of those on a remote for an OSMC box. It's a pain although admittedly it doesn't help that numbers and punctuation are shift characters indicated by being printed in minute dark blue characters on a black background.
Nobody is kidnapping devs off the street and sending them into the salt mines.
At one extreme is a group of people, maybe starting with one individual, who have a need for a particular piece of software which isn't met by anything or, at least anything they can afford and decide to cooperate to write their own. By cooperating they can produce something better than each doing their thing. They are not being paid* - that comes from their day jobs - but nevertheless they're getting something for it: they're getting the application they wanted for themselves and are prepared to share it.
At the other extreme are developers working for hardware makers such as Intel. They're producing the sort of drivers and other support software that turns the company's products from inert tim or silicon into working systems that customers are willing to buy. I've no idea what they're paid but I assume it isn't just pizza and Coke as long as they're in the office. Some of them may also be in the first group in their spare time.
Somewhere in the middle there are businesses that happen to need something in the same way that the individuals in the first group but not as a product but as something to support their operation and see the benefit of cooperating to produce it although in other respects they may be in competition. Again, nobody's suggesting that the employees who work on it aren't being paid proper salaries.
Try exercising your favourite search engine to find who develops Linux; there are a number of annual reports. The many individual contributors (and that includes those whose affiliations aren't known but some of whom might be contributing on behalf of an employer) collectively are about the same order of magnitude as several of the corporate contributors.
* This dreadful word "compensated" really doesn't fit. It's just puffed up language in this usage. It really means something other than a salary or wage despite being used that way. Used in this way it's the typical PR-speak used to make it seem that highly paid execs are being compensated for the hardship of their distasteful labours.