"unlimited cloud storage"
Just like unlimited data plans etc. Either it gets canned once it's too expensive of there's a small print definition of "unlimited" somewhere in paperwork referred to somewhere in the paperwork.
42400 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
When that bubble bursts there's going to be a lot of slack manufacturing capacity, unsold stock and even surplus stuff installed, some of it possibly in DCs that weren't even turned on because they didin't get a grid connection.
And even at best memory prices have a habit of being cyclic - high prices, build out production - glut - close fabs - shortage - high prices.
"how can they achieve digital sovereignty under private cloud providers Dell and HPE, who are also American companies"
By not using AI although it matters a good deal less on who makes the S/W than who controls the service that runs on it. The hierarchy is:
The service
The software
The hardware
The main risk is having services provided by businesses under extra-territorial control. The risk with S/W is the subscription model moving it up into the service tier. The hardware is mostly not a problem except possibly appliances such as routers and firewalls with embedded software.
This is where FOSS come in. It allows for user choice about who runs the service and avoids the subscription risk.
The best interview I ever had had only one question: "Are you still interested?" Of course I'd previously been body-shopped into them for a couple of years. When I went freelance I got most of my work through word of mouth. Even without that an aggressive interview approach would have been a warning that this is probably a sample of the company culture. In an interview the employer is being examined by the interviewee as well as the other way around.
Q1. Tell me how, in a video interview, you would detect that the other person was a deepfake.
Q2. Apply those to criteria to me. Am I a deep fake?
Q3. From my point of view, apply those criteria to yourself.
Q4. Assume I am a deep fake and from my point of view apply those criteria to me.
Q5. From your point of view apply those criteria to yourself.
Q6. Assume you are a deep fake, apply those criteria to yourself. Are you a deep fake?
Q7. How many GPU cores does it take to fake you?
There are schemes which are supposed to work with encrypted data. Presumably they're computationally expensive as you say. But the application is going to need the keys and they will either be stored on the host system, and hence vulnerable, or provided by the client and vulnerable in transit. That just makes illegal access more difficult but not impossible.
"But much panic and FUD, and circumventing normal medical rules to flog vaccines that hadn't been properly tested, but the drug dealers made billions."
Certainly much FUD although we may not be referring to the same material.
But let's stand back a moment and consider.
This was a novel disease-causing agent. History tells us what damage can be wrought by those, in fact they don't need to be novel, just long enough after the last outbreak to leave the population immunologically ill-prepared. Without treatments and with severe enough symptoms the deaths can account for several tenths of the population in very short order. Time is of he essence.
In those circumstances it would be grossly irresponsible of the medical profession and then government not to take urgent action.
That includes epidemiological modelling using what ever data was to hand which, initially was a small sample from China. Yes, as time went on it would be refined but it's no use saying we'll wait for a more precise worst case prediction before deciding on what action is justified if by that time, in absence of action, it's killed 10% of the world population. Note that : worst case prediction justifies action; not responding to worst case prediction is no better and no less irresponsible that crossing fingers and hoping for the best.
It's no use arguing that the historical pandemics were taken against a background of no effective medical knowledge. In the early days that was very much the situation with Covid - it's a novel disease so by definition there's no knowledge of effective treatment beyond nursing care. That included ventilators given that it's a respiratory disease but they have the problem of being invasive which carries risk, so use in any given case is a matter of balance, and scarce which would be a more severe limiting factor. What medical knowledge would say is that as a viral disease it won't respond to antibiotics so no amount of penicillin would be of use except against secondary infections. Anti-retroviral treatments might be possible but in short supply. The best options would be to reduce spreading rate and get cracking on a vaccine in parallel with which, start very quick trials of treatments to improve outcomes of infections that weren't prevented. From the latter it was discovered that CPAP machines were as effective as ventilators in many case, non-invasive, cheaper and available in quantity; and also anti-inflammatories also improved outcomes.
As to vaccines, a few years earlier, before the use of m-RNA, development would have been a slow process. About the turn of the year the Chinese provided the genome of the virus which meant that development could start immediately and take a feew weeks. Where time was the essence that was important. No, clinical trials were not avoided. They were certainly telescoped but again time was of the essence. They showed effective immunity and, on that scale, no side effects. Like everything else in medicine balance of risks was involved. Yes, use at scale beyond clinical trials caused some deaths, more would have been caused by waiting. It isn't even possible to say whether those who died from those side effects wouldn't have died from Covid otherwise.
Frankly I think that everyone involved in the vaccine production and trials did a brilliant job producing an effective response at essential speed deserves congratulations. They do not deserve ignorant denigration and nit-picking.
'entirely located within the EU, and physically and logically separate from other AWS Regions'
Note that they didn't say it's really separated from them. Never be bemused by a list, always look to see what's not in it.
The whole thing is headed by an Amazon exec. What happens when a US President says "I'm sanctioning Europe. Stop providing IT services to them. And Amazon, don't forget to tell that exec of yours with that sovereign thing that that includes him."?
Certainly Trump gets a good blasting there but this line near the start is the significant one in the view of many of us "In the Trump‑redux era of 2026, European enterprises are finally taking data seriously"
The key word in there is "finally". It's Trump's behaviour that's finally waking people up to what they should have been taking seriously well before his arrival on the scene.
After GDPR came in, for instance we've seen all sorts of privacy fig-leaves put in place to make it OK to keep sending EU citizens' data* to the US for processing and that was even before the CLOUD Act.
* that included UK citizens originally and Brexit has not improved that situation.
There are a lot of people who, if they'd had the vision, would have seen this coming long ago. Recent developments have made it more obvious. Carney's speech seems to have been analysed in the sort of press they're likely to have read. Many of then - maybe your lot, maybe not - are starting to wake up.
How far up the IT chain does the "can't do anything about it" run? Do you have any suggestions if someone a bit further up the chain starts asking questions in anticipation of questions from further up? When it all goes critical are you part of the problem or part of the solution?
This particular article dealt with resellers. Car analogy incoming:
The individual car owner might well swap brands next time he buys a car. A car dealer who has an agency for a particular manufacturer will be in trouble if the manufacturer consolidates their dealer network into a few dealerships of which they're not one.
"Optimus might be well suited to tasks like bomb defusing/disposal. If it screws up, who cares? But I think there are already bots for that."
The one I saw was a remote-controlled trolley with a shotgun mounted on it. The theory is that it blows the detonating mechanism apart without actually triggering it. The reason I saw it was that it was behind the lab where I worked. The suspicious parcel had been placed there to be accessible. Of course, being inside the building I'd have been out of sight of cowhorsefrog and, therefore, by his logic, doing no work.
"Most people here who have answered to me, are examples of this, they cant actually say what these people or themselves do"
OK, let me tell you some of the things that I did as a Civil Servant,.
One of the first jobs that I got given was making bits of clothing from a bomber sufficiently presentable to his family for identification which mostly consisted of removing bits of bomber from them.
Examined other messy things that you probably would preferred not to have done.
Examined scenes of crime where I needed an armed police or army escort.
Worked in a building that was targetted by bombers, unsuccessfully when I worked there, successfully later.
Taken a sample from a rifle that was subsequently discovreed to have been booby-trapped. A similarly booby-trapped shotgun had killed two police officers a few weeks earlier.
In conjunction with a pathologist, excavated the remains of a murder victim buried 7 years earlier. That was one of the armed escort jpbs.
Written reports that could help convict or exonerate people accused of crimes.
Given evidence in court on such matters under cross-examination.
Now you tell us what you've done.
"That's how the farmer gets $0.20 for a kilo of grapes and the consumer pays $16.00 for a kilo of grapes."
I doubt most of the difference goes in paying those whose jobs involve just coming into the office as you seem to think. I'd guess most of the mark-up is the supermarket's although it will cost money to transport them (probably refrigerated).
However, as to AUTOMATING (your shout) office jobs, most weekend papers have a column dedicated to customers and taxpayers who got screwed by banks, finance companies, travel companies, property companies, government departments etc and cannot get hold of anyone to sort things out until a journalist rings the press office. That's auomation at work.