"It also means the USA can effectively switch off any Azure services as and when they please"
And even when they don't please. I'm reminded of the song of the Siamese cats.
33111 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Which rules would those be? Rules that allow MPs' communications to be monitored? Good idea - until you want to write to your MP about something confidential. What was that? You don't think you should be monitored when you communicate with your MP?
It looks as if we're getting back to the bad old days when residents of Scunthorpe and Penistone had trouble signing up to stuff: https://linux.slashdot.org/story/18/12/20/1753257/debians-anti-harassment-team-is-removing-a-package-over-its-name In fact residents of Titchfield might have the same problem.
"The GDPR and other rumblings are the result of arrogance by Suckerberg, et. al."
Not really. In Europe the antecedents are the DPAs of the 1980s. It may have taken the US a few decades to realise that there's a problem but unless I missed one somewhere this is now the 3rd such Act in the UK. The current version reacts to the need to bring the penalties up to date with inflation and to make them scale with the size of the offender and to penalise the usual weaselling actions of offenders.
"The difference is that there's really one use for guns (especially in the UK which is really too densely populated for hunting with guns, except shotguns*, to be a thing), which is killing people."
There's competition shooting for a start. Post-Dunblane the ban lead to the shooting contingent of the UK Olympic team having to train abroad. And yet smarmer-in-chief Blair had his photo-opportunity with the team. I was surprised that those affected didn't boycott him.
The trouble with urgent legislation in response to something like this is that it's not well thought out and liable to err on the side of being too all-embracing or nigh on impossible to enforce. The pit-bull legislation is an example of the latter.
*I believe deer stalking uses rifles. There are large portions of the UK less densely populated than those you're familiar with.
There have been no reports of anyone seeing drones taking off or landing, or at least none have been made public. This restricts the locations to isolated buildings or open locations well away from visibility of roads and groups of houses whilst still near enough to Gatwick. I'd expect that right now there are searches through mobile tower records looking for mobiles that can be triangulated to those areas at those times. I wouldn't rule out someone getting a knock on the door from the plod between now and the New Year.
"Why is it that politicians (and pilots on PPrune) don't seem to understand that regulation only stops people who are prepared to abide by the rules?"
It also provides sanctions against those who don't abide by them. It increases the scope of "those who are prepared" from just "those who are willing" to "those who don't want to face the sanctions". That's not insignificant.
"Hopefully Logitech's New Year resolution will be to forge a closer relationship with its passionate fans and learn that it can make a better product with their help, rather than cut them out."
An even better resolution would be to start thinking intelligently so it doesn't get into this sort of situation again. They knew what the immediate consequences would have been (stuff would stop working) but didn't think beyond those (customers whose stuff stops working are not happy customers) and further still (unhappy customers are apt to (a) sue and (b) become somebody else's customers instead).
"Internet not working - didn't pay the bill for 6 months"
I had an ISP for my home internet who didn't get paid for a few months because my card had expired. I eventually got a final and only warning. Was it too difficult for them to have emailed a warning the first time payment failed? Sometimes these companies can't look after their own interests as well as they might.
At one time we used SunAccount. They put a warning on every screen at login about a month before the licence was due for renewal. It played havoc with our screen-scraping program we used to keep account details in sync with the ordering system.
"I am intrigued how police are searching?"
I'd start with a bit of map work. Unless we're not being told nobody's reported their neighbours operating them or reporting having seen them from a passing car. So you start looking for some isolated locations not too far away. Then get airborne to check them out.
"f it was one of the Mirror(Reach) group then there is a button - I was wrong about measurement it is called information and storage."
And it does absolutely nothing to the huge list of pre-ticked opt-in boxes. At least it doesn't in my browser. Possibly it might if I opened up to the huge list of sites that want to run scripts on that page but that defeats the object. And in any case it doesn't affect the basic offence against GDPR. By being pre-ticked they're opt-out not opt-in.
"Until the social media giants exercise their rights and prevent third parties publishing colourless images of their trademarks."
In that case the site owners would have to weigh up their options and not having the media buttons seems increasingly likely for someone who has taken this precaution in the first place.
"I did look for any method of disabling them all, there wasn't one. I've landed on a few other sites that did have such an option. This one was just plain hostile."
Let me guess. What used to be Trinity Mirror Group? I think it's now called Reach.
"What's the terminal velocity of such a spent rifle bullet as it finally hits the ground?"
Not entirely comparable to a falling round but IIRC someone in S Belfast was hit by what was believed to have been a stray round fired from N Belfast. It was a long time ago so I don't remember the details. But the danger zone can be quite large.
"got out of the mindset of relying on code running on a particular server quite some time ago."
I'm genuinely curious about this sort of thing.
Is your data purely ephemeral?
If not, how do you manage connections between the not-a-particular-server and the server holding the persistent data? Each time you invoke service you'll need to set up a connection between wherever it's running and the data server and that would include authentication - hopefully two way because the application server would need to know it's connected to the real data just as much as the data server would need to know the connection comes from a genuine application. This takes time and resources. In fact if I understood the account of the TSB debacle correctly it was this sort of issue that was the underlying problem.
Another aspect is that if you don't have control over where the application runs you can't be sure of the speed of the link to where the data sits.
I'd expect issues like this to be serious hit on performance when it gets into production.
"Back in the day, we had developers and we had users."
Yup. I was there. I had a strong preference for development tools which would let you lash up a working demo/prototype on the fly whilst talking to the user. It did depend on having good users. I had a colleague who'd put together a demo and then find the users rejected the whole proposed system because they didn't like something about it and couldn't get their heads round the idea that it was intended to refine what it was they wanted.
"Then, slowly, all the hangers-on moved in - the business analysts"
It depends on the business analysts. If you get a good one it's great to be ablel to bounce ideas off each other. I've had that a couple of times.