"Unless your quantum computer is normalised and does not require magic infrastructure you are limited,"
I thought magical infrastructure was the essential requirement.
Still 5 years away.
42414 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
I have no direct involvement with Facebook. Nevertheless before I give anyone, official or otherwise, extolling E2EE a hearing I want to see them publish the following:
Their name and address.
Their online banking credentials.
Any additional ecommerce credentials they may have.
If they think think those are things that must be kept hidden then they need to realise that I have similar things that need to be kept hidden and that's what E2EE is about.
It's not an erroneous CC, it's a legally binding notice. The fact that it's possible to send out such a notice in this way doesn't make it any less legally binding. If you look at the PDFs they have a facsimile of s signature on them.
It would be well for those permitting their signature to to be used in this way to consider the safeguards they require - perhaps documents should require their personal release. (I've worked on a system that not only send out such "signed" documents. I was a sub contractor to the sub contractor to one of the usual suspects to whom the entire operation had been contracted out. OTOH I don't think the "signed" documents in this case carried the same legal weight.)
They're official notices giving or withholding permission to do things which have large amounts of money depending on them. So much so that there are frequent casual allegations of corruption surrounding them - any thread dealing with local govt. here is apt to include a few - and I have memories of at leas one scandal that became national news. This is serious stuff. It's not somebody ordering a gross of boxes of paperclips instead of a box of a gross.
The PDFs in the article are of notices sent to the applicants with the relevant official's signature on them. From the point of view of the recipient of an apparently official notice it should be assumed that it won't be rescinded as a mistake at some future date. The incorporation of nonsense in an official notice isn't a reliable indicator that it wasn't meant.
It still doesn't prevent you having a manual process around it. Click on the relevant fields without completing the process, collect P45. I take your point from earlier that it's a piece of S/W with problems but that just makes manual authorisation more necessary.
It would appear that in this case someone has been given access without any warning as to the risks or without being told what, if anything, is the authorisation process,
We hadn a similar situation. I used to live not far away from Late Bronze Age/Iron Age hill fort, later converted to a Normal motte and bailey castle. It had an Arts and Crafts period stone-built pub built inside it which was a nice enough building although it would almost certainly never have had planning permission. I'm not sure if it was listed with the rest of the site although I think it would have been worth it.
The owners got permission to extend the pub which required a certain amount of demolition. They demolished more than the permission allowed and were starting on a larger extension than allowed (which in turn would have broken extra ground within the scheduled monument). I think they would have been made to reinstate the excess demolition in the original materials. However they had, shall we say, failed to retain the (no doubt quite valuable stone on site. Oddly enough nobody knew where it had gone. So as they couldn't restore it they were ordered to demolish the remainder and grass over the site.
I believe they keep applying to rebuild. I'm not sure what the situation is now but occasionally there are murmurings of sympathy for them - frankly if it had been my decision they wouldn't have got the original extension position and I think the outcome is exactly right to set an example to anyone else who decides to mess with scheduled monuments.
"These errors will have to be rectified"
Which is nonsense. As the article points out, if they're acted on first there'll be no means to reverse them.
If the council has some means of imposing a hold whilst the JR takes place then there'll likely be civil action torecover the cost of the delay and £8k might only be the advance payment.
The WiFi trap is one that designers have worked on to improve over the years.
Removing the LED to indicate whether it's on or off has been one improvement. The move onto a function key was a master stroke. They could label the key with some nonsensical icon or go a step further and label it with something apparently irrelevant - of course an icon of an aeroplane means WiFi. And does the Fn key enable the actual Fn or the hardware functions.
Industrial design has contributed a lot to laptop ease of use over the years.
The operative word is "do", not "write".
It's designed to: a) avoid the pre-filtering by some Turing failure; b) avoid opening all the envelopes unless the very last one is that of the only viable candidate; c) be fair in that none of the applications are checked before closing so someone who takes time over their application isn't disadvantaged; d) try to cut down on the number of applications by warning off the bull-shitters (although this might fail for Dunning-Krugger reasons); e) lean towards actual experience rather than paper qualifications and f) be upfront about the whole process.
"Here's the job description. If you think you can do it tell us why. Applications close on $DATE and none will be considered before then.
"Applications will be reviewed by people who know what they're talking about, not HR, and who can spot BS a mile away. If there are too many to go through them all we'll pull out a sample at random until we get the sort of person we're looking for.
"You might be a good fit but someone who's good enough might get considered first and offered the job. It's a matter of chance but we think it's at least as fair as drawing up a short-list by looking for reasons to exclude you. If you don't like it, don't apply. If you do apply and you're the person we need, good luck."
I wonder if anyone would have the wit to do that.
Some of us don't "get" Windows.
A Linux distro isn't a project as such, it's a collection of projects. But in terms of building a user community each one needs to understand what its particular user base requires. I've made a similar point in the past in relation to deskoip managers - an app-based manager such as Unity is useless to a user whose requirements are document based.
One thing I've never been able to understand is the number of distros claiming to be very lightweight. Is the hair shirt community really that big?
Not cheap?
Back in the day small businesses quite frequently ran on Informix/SCO/Intel tower server combinations. It was cost effective enough for them then.
I've no idea what the cost comparisons would be with Windows stuff today but in any case you could take the SCO out of that and replace by Linux or BSD You could take Informix out and replace by PostGres or MySQL. Or your could replace them by Microsoft products, only the server remains constant. Which is cheapest?
"But a lot of stuff -- likely including mission critical software isn't available for Unix"
Let's look at that one. Storing the day-to-day data is fairly mission critical. The sort of stuff for which you use an RDBMS. There have always been Unix packages for that. Microsoft started development of SQL Servier from one of those, Sybase.
Perhaps a good start would be to use one of those for the main business database(es) and have an isolated system to test the backups, just in case.
And I wonder if there's punctuation hiding there in plain sight. How are statements delimited? I suspect that EOL has a function in the language.
If so then either
1. They can't write multiple statements on one line
2. They can't write statements that run onto the next line unless there's a way of escaping the new lines in which case
3. They now have to learn about escape characters, a more complicated concept, and
4. They also have to learn about statement delimiters which is more complicated because
5. They're hidden in plain sight.