Re: Well...
"people with stopwatches have actual evidence that a single menu works best"
It probably depends on what you're doing. What works well for one sort of task doesn't necessarily work for another.
40413 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
virtual desktops provide "good enough" functionality
It depends what you're doing. If you need a couple of documents open side-by-side, such as something you're working on and something you're referring to swapping workspaces doesn't cut it.
Yesterday, for instance, I was extracting dates from a PDF of medieval records to convert to conventional dates, tabulated in a spreadsheet. Workspace 1 had the PDF occupying the left half of the screen. The lower right had my own program for cleaning up rubbish OCR text from the PDF to paste into the spreadsheet. The dates there were along the lines of "Friday after the feast of St Barnabas[June 11]"*. The spreadsheet was in the top right, set to all workspaces.
Flip to WS 2 & I had not only the spreadsheet but a terminal open to run cal for the year concerned to find out what day June 11 was in 1309 or whenever. Also a jotting pad for working out some of the more complicated logic round the variable feasts (Easter etc).
Multiple desktops help but an essential part of the mix is being able to maximise use of the desktop to display the document being worked on alongside so much other stuff. Even the task bar is set to autohide to allow maximum use of the space.
* The original editor had provided most of the fixed feast days which cut out a lot of searching.
"Now a Windows NT 4.0 UI clone."
KDE, set the menu system to the original cascading menu style. Use the Windows 9x application style and some of the various downloadable styles for GTK apps. Download Reactionary decorations. Job done plus the options for multiple workspaces and the like. I have a desktop appearance that's changed scarcely at all in the last couple of decades end then only subtly and mostly for the better (except where KDE managed to screw up, especially on auto-hide).
Tricky quiz as it assumes experience of both Mac and Windows and even as far as Windows goes I haven't really used it in an age and even then a W2K instance in a VM for one application is about it. However question 4 is spot on as far as KDE is concerned. The unhide location could be set to a corner up to and including V3, then it just became the entire edge and, exactly as he describes, it's too easy to hit unintentionally. It's a design choice that should be rolled back.
With the push to do everything paperless there's less incentive - and quite possibly no mechanism - for customers to notify changes of address to suppliers. If the only contact detail for a customer is the mobile number then unless that's ported over to the new network the old supplier has no way to reach them. And that's apart from any impacts of successive DPAs on retaining records or, as the article mentions, the likelihood of any attempt at communication being ignored as spam.
In fact, it's surprising how many do get reimbursed.
"So how's that cloud thing working for ya?"
For me? NextCloud runs on a Pi, Apart from being a backup it also shares stuff between my laptop & SWMBO's. Aso in this case it's on my computer.
And it needs to keep being said because so many people don't realise it until something like this story happens.
"One month I got one such email from them within days of receiving one from their security dept, warning all customers never to click links in emails to log in!"
I'm pretty sure I've had such security emails that actually contained links themselves. My building society has a leaflet listing the domains they'll genuinely use. This hasn't penetrated as far as their marketing department who have used others. The links which appear to be genuine are actually sub-domains that resolve to marketing companies. I've even raised this at their AGM., not least because they're training their customers to be phished.
What should really concern security departments is that if marketroids expect customers to click on random links in random emails it's because they themselves see no issue in doing so. I strongly suspect that most successful phishing attacks are through marketing departments.
It seems that they need far more than simply replacing the board. They need to change the articles of association to limit the ability to do anything outside run a registry without a vote by the majority of the membership, not just the turnout. They also need to ensure that the board publishes a full account of what it does.
A quick search shows that a Nominet Charitable Trust is a registered charity but I can find no such registration for this alleged non-profit itself. If it's really a non-profit then maybe the entire outfit should be registered so that the whole of its activities come under the scrutiny of the Charity Commissioners.
I certainly wouldn't follow a link to our local newspaper's site. Unless they've changed they have an opt out to over 100 other sites, their site is crap and any other stories they offer usually turn out to be from some of their other "local" titles. I would probably still be reading the print edition if they'd put more effort into getting it delivered but that stopped years ago. It wouldn't surprise me, BTW, if they and Rupert's Oz organs used an image from Streetview whenever they need a picture of somewhere an incident happened.
"It's very much an issue for the developer to deal with, because it is they that should carry liability when their creation starts causing harm."
I mostly agree but it shouldn't really be on the developer but on whoever's responsible for deploying it. It's up to them to determine whether it's fit for purpose. The developer might not even be aware of the purpose to which it was put, nor would they necessarily endorse it for that purpose if they were.
What regulation applies to them apart from Companies House?. Are they under Ofcom and if not why not? As a non-profit are they under the Charities Commission? If they can win the vote then they would probably be clear as far Companies House are concerned but otherwise if one of the others has authority then they should be taking an interest. Maybe the Ministry of Fun, AKA the Department for Digital, Culture Media and Sport should also be taking an interest.