"And lacking in outdoor space."
Which is a problem if you're depending on a heat pump extracting heat flux from the area you don't have.
40413 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Other way round, the asked those with generators to switch over and those without to shut down."
To be fair the quote in the article was a bit obscure: "Those of our customers who have backup generation, we curtailed them." Just what does "curtailed" mean? In the context it seems to have meant that they excused them from a cut but without taking context into account it reads as if they were given short shrift.
"Most Texan homes are not kitted out for arctic survival and apparently many homes were internally sub-zero if you did not own a log/gas fire."
It doesn't need weather stopping generation for this to be a problem. A local cable fault can have the same impact. We had an outage of about 15 hours at the beginning of December, That knocked out the central heating but we have gas fires and a gas hob so we could keep warm and prepare hot drinks and food. But as HMG policy is to ban dual fuel in new builds that's a problem stacking up for the future. However if it's a problem that only becomes serious in a future electoral cycle it doesn't matter as they can go into the next election waving their green credentials.
"The same address box that's sending every keystroke to Google?"
You let it do that, do you? What browser are you using? That can have an effect.
Seamonkey - can choose search engine or turn it off completely.
Waterfox - can choose search engine but don't see a quick way to turn it off completely even when a separate search engine is set. Can be set to forget history
Palemoon - similar to Waterfox
Firefox - As per Waterfox & but all sorts of Pocket stuff as well
If you remember, there was a similar argument about Google News in Spain, where Google said "fuck you" and shut down Google News entirely in Spain.
Didn't this also happen in Germany & that didn't go well for the German publishers? Maybe it depends on national characteristics - amount of information in the snippets on the publisher's side and willingness to click through by the users.
Reactions such as Intel's are for too common. Courts should react by reopening the cases, demand an explanation and, if not satisfied, double the award and add a matching fine for contempt of court. Repeat as needed if they still complain until either they're bankrupt or somebody catches on to the consequences of repeated doubling.
"Yes they do, and it's a _vicarious_ liability (which means they're liable even if they weren't aware of it)
Don't forward it to the nurseries"
The nurseries are the people to forward it to in the first instance, pointing out that they're using a product which opens them up to GDPR complaints from the parents. If they don't react then forward it to the parents. The probably non-technical but responsible nurseries will realise their problem and tackle it at stage one. It's the ones who don't who deserve a GDPR case against them at stage 2.
I wonder what they'd do if someone took "legacy non-functional codes" [sic] that were "there to distract hackers" literally and twiddled a few of these non-functional codes to not change the user IDs and passwords - which they obviously can't change if they're non-functional. At a guess scream that they've been hacked.
Anything - absolutely anything - to avoid doing the right thing:. going to the staff who actually do the work and talking to them. Why should any MBA expect staff on such lowly pay-grades to know how the business really works?
The usual process is to get a consultant to do that; he will charge a fee large enough to make the whole thing reassuringly expensive. Now, of course, it's got to be the fad de jour, AI.
"Hopefully these antics may be raising a few eyebrows in government as well."
What part of government?
Companies House is the regulator as far as company matters goes. It's an agency, i.e. a body enabling HMG to stay at arm's length. I'm not sure they have the right to take an interest until there's a complaint made to them about the board.
But who authorises Nominet to run the registry? Does govt grant them this? If so do they come under Ofcom for regulatory purposes?
Are they authorised by ICANN? If so then it sounds like a case of birds of a feather. Even if that's the case there should still be a case for making them answerable to Ofcom. They're just too significant a part of infrastructure to be left alone.
The immediate problem with that is that it generates the passwords on the fly form data such as login ID. One function of KeyPass and, presumably others, is to store not only the password but the login ID and maybe other needed information - such as the exact URL and other stuff such as answers to security questions.
This may come as a bit of a surprise to you but you can manage passwords on your own devices. KeyPassX does the job nicely. It will also generate passwords that look like line-noise so you can have unique passwords for each service. You need a sync mechanism. In my case it's a Pi running NextCloud.
You're reading a summary of the judge's summary of the evidence. It's possible that those changes were discussed with his employers or the need for them came to light in cases he handled during his employment. Remember two things about judges when reading a case report: they've seen and heard all the evidence and they've got where they are by being smart and experienced.
init option in sixth birthday release
I wonder if they've updated the drivers - must go and take a look.
Meanwhile the old laptop is resetting its W10 (it was ex-demo from ex-Staples - goodness knows what the original HDD had on it) so I can donate it to a school who'd probably have screaming hab-dabs over Linus. I'd forgotten just how long it takes Windows to do anything.... And UEFI - it hasn't even noticed the HDD has been changed and still thinks there's a "Debian" (yes, Devuan) on there.
Only as a non-functioning spacecraft. It will run out of power.
It depends on the energy provided by the decay of a radioactive isotope. The nature of radioactivity means that in order to provide that energy the isotope decays into something else. As time goes on there's less radioactive material and therefore less energy. In this case the half life - the time at which only half of the isotope previously there is now left - is 38 years. 38 years was generous in terms of the planned mission. In terms of an extended mission it isn't quite so generous. As it loses power more and more stuff has to be shut down to make use of what's left. At some point everything's gone and it becomes a non-functioning spacecraft.
Kids today. You have to explain everything.
And nuclear power was contributing to the GB grid in the 1950s. But for the efforts of self-styled environmentalists who unwittingly unthinkingly promoted fossil fuels there would have been a lot more.
Today, of course, to adapt a quote from a yachtsman, part of our electricity is supplied by nuclear fusion-powered gas turbines.
"I was curious to see how long it would take to lose it's tiny little mind"
We were due to return a loan machine. I'd dropped the database but in a similar fit of curiosity decided to try to ensure everything was overwritten by doing the dread recursive cat that we used to be warned about, starting with a file of ajs[odiJS[IFOJO'[SA style rubbish. I discovered it took far too long. I had to hit the switch so we could hand it back.
"The move comes as leaders from top chip companies urged President Biden to step up efforts to invest in home-fabbed semiconductors for national security reasons."
Probably the cheapest option would be to offer their CEOs and board memberss a mirror each and an instruction to look carefully at what they see in it. It might be necessary to ad an instruction as to which side to look at.
Somewhat different. Although the name changes in this case it's the same legal entity. Your double-glazing example would be a new legal entity each time so as to evade the responsibilities of the old one.
"It's almost as if Footfallcam don't actually know what they're doing at all."
Not at all. It's an extremely generous gesture on Footfallcam's part to draw the attention of prospective customers to this. Without it such prospective customers could make uninformed buying decisions.
It's also... _odd_ that she / Huawei can't produce their own copy of the blasted thing. Remember, the suggestion is that this PPT shows Huawei didn't mislead HSBC... so why do they need something that HSBC has?
According to the article she "seeks evidence of internal deliberations within the HSBC Group" not the PPT itself. That would provide proof that the presentation was actually made. Just providing a file without provenance wouldn't be useful - the prosecution could simply allege it had been put together after the non-existent event.
Having thought more about the article it's clear that he's only concerned with optimising one thing - speed to hit controls. There are more factors to be taken into account such as maximising use of screen space.
E.g. labels on menu bar buttons good because it's a bigger target to hit and therefore faster. In fact the space taken up by the larger buttons might be better used to display more on screen which be useful during all the time that the user isn't thrashing about the screen trying to hit buttons. For most users that's probably most of the time.