Re: Pining for the old school
So the system does what the user tells it to. PEBCAC.
42030 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
It seems all regulators have problems with fining multi-national corporations. It needs a bit of international cooperation. Perhaps the agreement on minimum corporation tax needs a rider to agree that fines should be set in terms of percentages of global annual turnover applied annually as long as the corporation is out of compliance. A corporation that's accumulated several fines of several percent each is going to start acting a bit more carefully, otherwise the shareholders and bonusocracy are going to start getting twitchy.
I hope KDE don't follow suit with kio-slaves". I have an ancient but still functional Buffallo NAS device on my home LAN. My Brother all in one device saves scans to it. Older versions of KDE would let me open that via SMB but the device was SMB2 and support for that was dropped. However FTP access is still an option. I could add the functionality elsewhere but it would be another make-work to replace something that is good enough in its context. If someone can eavesdrop on my home LAN I have bigger problems than sending plain text passwords to see my scans.
* Are they still allowed to call them that?
"released back into the grid when the wind stops."
Great. Come out of the house in the morning and find the car battery's flat because last night wasn't windy so it's been charging up the grid. You're not going to manage to jump start an EV.
What does "Save" mean in modern, visually representable terms? It might be saved to a local disk which the user has never seen, to a USB "thumb" drive (shall we use a picture of a thumb?), to an SD card, to a corporate server or to Somebody Else's Computer? The same thing applies all over interface design. How do you represent the idea of "Home" in the sense of a home page? How do you represent Back in a world where a script might be written right to left?
We have reached a situation where the icons for many operations are abstractions devoid of any physical meaning. In that respect a picture of a floppy disk is no less meaningful than any of the apparently random collection of lines that seem to constitute the "simple geometric forms" of "modern metaphors". It has, however, the saving grace of being the same as on the last version which where it had the saving grace of being on the last version right back to the version where saving to a floppy disk was actually a meaningful option.
It has the further saving grace, if being rendered as a small but perfectly formed coloured image of being instantly recognisable on a tool bar whereas "simple geometric forms" look just like a collection of apparently random lines and not easily recollected from the collection of apparently random lines on another application nor, indeed, on the same application when you closed it 10 minutes ago.
What user interfaces need are consistency both through time and between applications, to be readily distinguished one from another at a glance and hence for their meaning to be easily and permanently learned, even if that meaning is abstract rather than apparently physical.
Close was initially a problem. It was easily clicked with a slight navigational for the Max button. Existing applications assumed it wasn't possible to make such an error so easily, that Close meant Close and that there was no need to present an option of "did you really mean to do that without saving your work".
Apart from that description amounts to no more that a recital of existing common or best practice in GUIs. I suppose that for users migrating from character terminals it was a novelty. Our misfortune is that the apparent novelty was what appealed to commercial product managers and was perpetuated in place of the notion of common or best practice.
Access rather than Actions, I think. But, yes, it covered more than keyboard shortcuts. It also established an important principle: that the user should be able to do similar things in the same way to the extent that they have similar functionality such as opening a file.
That implies not only does the interface of one application match another in those respects, it should also match previous versions. The only excuse for failing to do that is that the previous version got it really badly wrong.
"There was another shop in my hometown, where I would buy individual transistors, resistors and capacitors"
Many hometowns had one. Those were the days.
Years later we had them back again as Maplin - a curse be upon leveraged buyouts.
Then a few weeks ago Google told me that someone had actually opened such a shop near me complete with a Streetview image to prove it. Alas, miracles don't last and by the time I got there I found a pet food shop occupying the premises.
But there is no uniform process for "asset owners" – the gas, water, telecoms or electricity companies who dig up roads to lay pipes and cables – to share their data about where exactly they have put everything.
The antics of those customers suggests the main obstacle isn't the lack of a platform, it's their existing lack of data about exactly where they've put everything.
If it can be used to screw more money out of the customer base overall Intel will have no problem at all with that.
What the customer base thinks about it is another matter, of course.The development work has been done. The production work has been done. If the price to the customer has not paid for all that it looks like the product has been deliberately sold at an initial loss to sucker the buying into paying for an upgrade that isn't an upgrade.
The mainframe industry was notorious for that and I doubt their customers admired them for it. Then the microprocessor came along and started eating away at the corporate computer market.
Who profited from that? Intel. Those who don't learn their history are doomed to repeat it but it seems Intel are going to play the role of the mainframe makers.
"poor spam filters allow emails that look an awful lot like they are from Microsft"
If there's one thing Microsoft really ought to be able to trap it's spam that claims to come from them and doesn't and yet it seems to account for most of the spam that gets through. The usual Nigerian Prince and similar stuff is routinely trapped.
Also a very long time ago we had a fixed seating plan - tables of six, 5th or 6th former in charge of each (no separate 6th form college). Food prepared in batches for each table and shared out by or under supervision of the pupil in charge. No multiple choices, eat what the day's menu was. Any facial recognition was by the senior pupil on the table. If, fr whatever reason, you weren't having school dinner you wouldn't have a table.