Re: Time for an Audit?
The University should have immediately and voluntarily offered to pay for it. I would, at the very least, have given the appearnce of having some ethical sense.
40558 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Bragging about this in their prospectus wouldn't look too good anyway. Admitting it would be ethical - it would tell the candidates to look elsewhere if they don't want the University's reputation hung around their necks when they graduate. But it seems their motto is "Any way but Ethics".
"Yes, I know some open source coders do get financial support - but not many."
Don't confuse number of contributors with number of contributions, at least as far as the Linux kernel is concerned. There are regular reports on who writes the Linux kernel. The top contributors in terms of actual material contributed are corporate.
"It is clear that these guys are not bad guys."
It's far from clear that these guys are not bad guys. It's very clear that anything they've contributed is not to be trusted which is why Greg K-H has been put to the trouble of stripping it all out.
And what, now, is going to be the value of a University of Minnesota CS degree after the department has trashed its reputation?
OK, let me give a more considered answer which yes and no.
The skills you have as a Windows admin or whatever are in wide demand but a lot of people have them. They're a commodity to be traded, at least that's the way agencies and HR will look at them and at the people who have them. Wages will stagnate because there's always somebody who hasn't got a job will take your job at a low wage.
So, yes, your response should be to teach yourself new stuff but no, not so you can stay in the low wage trap. You do it to get out of that trap. What you need is to know stuff that's just coming into demand but that relatively few people have.
You also have to remember that the new stuff you learn will become a commodity skill in due course by which time you need to be somewhere else.
It's always best to remember that people who write statements like that aren't always lying - they just know how to write English so that it has to be carefully construed to get its true meaning. The strictness doesn't need to be applied to the policy, not even to the licence. It needs to be applied to the enforcement.
And another instance of el Reg allowing the length of a title, extending it automatically when it's quoted and then declaring their ow extended title too long.
"you still haven't done anything that addresses the problem which is that it is 1) a profitable and low risk form of crime and 2) leaving servers unpatched is cost effective. Change that balance and the problem goes away."
I haven't done anything to stop it? You are the one that's complaining about a mechanism to stop it. If you go back, look what I suggested and have a little think about it you'll realise that it makes patching servers cost effective. Keep the server patched and you don't have a problem, leave it unpatched and you do.
Where's your suggestion to change the balance? Something slightly more severe than a slap on the wrist? Probably still cheaper that paying a good admin to keep an eye on things.
The suggestion that "next week it will be something else" is pure fantasy on your part. What was suggested would need legislation. Legislation does not get changed to "something else" in a week nor does it get changed easily.
And you still haven't said whether you prefer the authorities to break into the system to remediate which was what the article was about.
"A company wants to publish information embarrassing to the government de jour"
The issue is malware. I think you're stretching the definition of malware a little more than warranted to include publishing information embarrassing to the government.
The alternative being posited was for the authorities to step in invasively to fix servers. Do you prefer that?
A better option would be the power to instruct the operators (the business owners, not the techies) to take it off-line forthwith until it's rectified. Add a backup power to tell the operator's ISP to remove internet connection if a response isn't forthcoming. Such a power would cover DDOS botnet members and the like. The downside is that it would give ammo to the "This is Microsoft" outfits but they need to be dealt with in any case.
"The paramilitaries in NI will use any situation to justify violence and boost their criminal activities."
For a long time they've been denied that opportunity but BoJo has handed them that one.
To some extent PSNI seem to have been handed the dirty end of the stick. it's a variation on the owing the bank money situation: you break COVID restrictions; you have a problem, 2000 people break COVID restrictions, the police have a problem. However, you're right in that the politicians who went to the funeral have to shoulder some of the blame.
"You may have realised that the British government has put potential future trade with the US which is thousands of miles away above real actual trade and social stability with one of its own countries in its own union."
And failed because Biden is pro-peace process so isn't likely to be impressed by the mess that's developing.