"ever day I encounter at least one website with which it simply does not work at all"
I find that frequently with different browsers but that's because they won't display at all without a shedload of javascript servers being allowed.
40485 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
30 years!
The business I worked for was moving - mostly had moved - from London to Leeds. I hung on until the summer because of my daughter's GCSEs. The move involved taking an HP-UX system up the road. I'd always assumed the physically huge, even for the time, drives were more or less bomb-proof. In fact the engineers heaved a sigh of relief when they were slotted back in the rack, powered up and fscked successfully.
Because of the circumstances my daughter started 6th form college that September. This September her daughter starts in the same college.
30 years!
"t seems even that potential treatments are actively forbidden by governements and fraudulently badmouthed by leading scientists."
It appears that you've been looking in the wrong places. Perhaps you've been looking at bleach and the like.
CPAP
Dexamethasone
There's a couple of effective treatments to be getting on with. Search for the RECOVERY trial. You'll find at least one more that's been found effective and several to be trialled.
But have you stopped to think why vaccines are getting the most publicity. There are a couple of reasons. One you might have heard of - it's a well known saying about the relative merits of prevention and cure. The other - well, try to work it out for yourself.
I don't suppose there were too many estimates of the environmental consequences either (hint - a very large global death rate would have been environmentally beneficial given that it's the human population that's the big problem). However the political effects of letting a pandemic run its course are not good as soon as people start weighing up the probability that they might not be in the survivors.
"the Government's own estimate was that lock down had killed 25,000 (actually dead before July) and would kill another 185,000 (missed cancers etc) in years to come. Those were not dead 'of covid' or 'with covid' but specifically 'without covid' / due to lock down effects."
Could we please have a citation for that to make sure you're claiming direct effects of lock down and (are there any mechanisms suggested for this) rather than deaths due to treatments not given because hospital and specifically ITU beds were occupied by COVID cases?
If the files were sitting around openly on the web then the expectation should have been that this could happen. If they didn't want that they shouldn't have left them sitting around in the open but it was entirely their own fault that they didn't ensure reality and intent didn't match.
Illegal on what basis? There's nothing in the report to say it would have come under GDPR. It doesn't appear to have been a plc so it seems unlikely that there would have been any financial regulatory implications. AFAICS they might well have regarded it as commercially confidential information in which case their only responsibility would have been to themselves.
Or a phone running LineageOS?
I don't know about Google key-logging but I'm not happy about the way a recent update has resulted in all the F-Droid sourced apps are move off the favourites page every time it restarts which, with my frequency of failing to recharge, is fairly often.
The benefit of separating desktop layer from the underlying OS is that the user can continue using whatever it is that they think works best for whatever it is they need to do. Where the desktop is integrated users have to accept whatever brain farts the vendor inflicts on them, whether it works or not. I see no indication that this in any way inhibits proprietary vendors from fixing what wasn't broken to any degree at all. In the FOSS world we can just ignore it.
I read that when Apple designed the original Mac UI they tested it with new office hires. At that time few would have had much experience with computers and none with GUIs so they were able to find out what worked best without the subjects having prior expectations.
My protocol for conducting a test would require three people for each test.
A tester who has no experience of the product being tested and a list of things to be achieved.
An expert from the design/development team. The tester is only allowed to ask and the expert is only allowed to answer questions of the pattern "Where does it tell me how to xxxxx?"
The third person is an invigilator whose nominal role is to enforce that rule but in fact is there to prevent violence between the other two.
"routers are often key components for the ISP's service so can't be easily switched out"
PlusNet's can be switched out. I've recently done this after discovering that they'd reconfigured theirs from their end (itself a worry) with the net effect of me not being able to configure my DHCP as I wish.
As the original setup had a separate VDSL modem a combined unit has actually taken the box count down.
"(?Benign)"
Bind9, maybe.
In the UK that might be the situation. What were the requirements in ancient Greece where the name, if not the role, originated? Applying your own definition, even by law, does not give you the rights you might think you have over language. ISTR a US state discovering that the hard way in respect of "engineer".
"Corporations should never be allowed to use someone's work without payment."
Could you quote any of the open source licences which say this? Because unless the licence makes that stipulation they are allowed to do so. They're allowed by the developers who release the code that way. It might personally offend you your opinion only counts if you're one of the developers and somehow I don't think they care about taking advice from you.
Do you even know why the GPL came about? It was because RMS got pissed off with his work being taken closed by a corporation for no payment. He devised the GPL so that no corporation could do that again - not the "without payment" bit, but the taking it closed. That's what matters in the open source world.
"Detailed diagnosis of tech industry delusion falls short of prescribing a cure"
Not necessarily to be held against it. Zeroth law of problem solving: in order to solve a problem you've got to know there is one. 1st law of problem solving: In order to solve a problem you've got to know what it is.
It still makes no sense. The shareholders are the company - it's a company of shareholders. Unless there are different classes of shares the value they say was being directed to the shares of large shareholders was also directed to the shares of smaller shareholders. The crash in share values that affected them also affected the large shareholders.
A successful suit involves shareholders' funds being paid to shareholders to compensate them for loss of value plus lawyer's costs. Without the expenses it's shareholders shifting the remaining money from one pocket to another. With the costs..... Can anyone spot who actually makes money out of this?