Re: The Cloud...
Maybe we should update that along the lines of "Other peoples' computers who have control over you."
42420 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
If only its home market were bigger, say the whole of the EU, and was protected from foreign imports that didn't comply.
Alternatively, the UK could duplicate the legislation locally. It would then receive the same protection from non-compliant imports and sell compliant products to the rest of the EU encumbered only by all the other complications of the EU now being an export market instead of an extended home market. Of course to do that means effectively accepting legislation that we had no input into.
Remind me again how freedom from EU legislation was going to enable us to take back control and make us more competitive.
"It names as defendants not only IBM but current and former executives including Rometty, former CFO Martin J. Schroeter (now CEO of IBM spin-off Kyndryl), current CFO James J. Kavanaugh, and current CEO Arvind Krishna."
IBM as an entity, like any other business, is owned by its investors. Why do investors persist in suing themselves? It they win all they succeed in doing is routing money from themselves to themselves less the amounts paid to two lots of lawyers - net, they pay two lots of lawyers If they lose they don't shit money from themselves to themselves but they still pay two lots of lawyers. It's lose-lose. Is there some remote possibility that this behaviour is incited by lawyers?
OTOH, suing the executives and maybe the board makes sense if the effect was to enrich specific individuals by pursuing policies detrimental to the shareholders.
If a system is accredited in the patch state it was in when it was tested what happens when there are further patches? Does the accreditation lapse because a patched system is no longer in the same state? If it remains in the same state does the accreditation lapse because it is now out of date?
The executive summary says "At the forefront of the discourse is a false dichotomy between protecting privacy and ensuring national security. ... On the privacy side, it is believed that governments and law enforcement agencies desire unrestrained exceptional access to EZEE communications to spy on their citizens." If that's what they believe that to be the whole of the privacy side then it certainly is false. The essence of privacy isn't just to protect against governments and law enforcement to spy on their citizens - it's to protect against anybody spying on anyone.
Although they then go on to say that the issues are more nuanced letting that misleading summary of the argument stand unmodified in the executive summary - and in the first paragraph which might be the reading limit for some skimming the report - is seriously misleading. It's just asking to be quoted out of context.
I think the stake for a place in the argument for anyone arguing against has to be the willingness to post online their login credentials for their bank, shopping sites, social media, work etc. We need that to be able to see the extent to which they understand their "If you've nothing to hide...." mantra.
Can I add that this comment is in no way associated with yesterday's experience with an Amazon locker with a no-longer pristine opening mechanism and a help number that doesn't go through to the agent queue but a recorded message telling me to key 1 to get an SMS to get connected to an agent or to use their app if I'd installed it on my phone - or maybe, if I'd listened that long, they mught have told me to go to their site on my computer which was several miles away at home. Silly me expecting a help number to go through to a help line.
Another site that attempts to deliver nothing unless it's allowed to use javascript. If I were a potential customer I'd take that as indicative of the whole business's capability of delivering. If you're willing to use what is, in effect, your shop front to demonstrate how your developers fail to cope with anything but the happy path then we have to assume that that will also apply to the service itself.