Re: Assuming it's actually possible
They're good at politics. They're just not good at running countries.
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
He couldn't invade in 1805, agreed. By 1812 things had changed. For one thing we were also at war with the US.
Perhaps the main lesson is that having made successful choices in the past is no guarantee that the next choices will also be successful. That's why all this idea of reconstructing the mind of someone successful is so idiotic. You know what their correct choices were, You should know that your reconstruction would not be expected to continue to do so.
"See told me sufficient material exists to create AI-powered interactive versions of historical figures like Napoleon"
What-ifery. The trap that lies waiting for would-be historians. What if Napoleon had continued with his plan to invade England instead of switching to Russia? Ditto Hitler.
Napoleon died a couple of centuries ago. There's no way of asking him why he took such an ill-advised decision. There's no telling what his reaction would have been to any situation since then. It's just guess-work dressed up as high tech. Utter nonsense.
It's not really that bigger pool from which to select. If you're good at the sorts of things that governments have to decide about you should be able to make a living in the private sector and possibly a better one than MPs' or even Ministers' salaries. You know that even if you go into politics, however good your intentions, you're going to be immediately bad-mouthed by multitudes who know nothing about you, can't be bothered to find out and immediately assume the worst,* and you're going to find that unless you're very lucky, most of your constituents disagree with your politics** and are against you for that reason. The consequence is that too many of those who do decide on politics are the people least suitable for office.
TL;DR If you're capable of running a whelk stall you'll probably choose doing that over politics.
* For which reason if for no other we get the politicians we deserve.
** Even amongst those who support your party will decide you're on the wrong wing of it.
I rather suspect that having gone to several advisors to ask for specialist advice and been told "Here's or advice but you need to ask for specialist advice" that the reality would be that any further advisor would have much the same response and that you really weren't going to get any further.
And the ink for the cheap device will be particularly expensive. That's why the device is cheap. The prices are probably carefully calculated that it's just a little more expensive to keep sending the devices to land fill and buy another then to buy new ink cartridges.
Signing every page is a protection against pages being substituted. It's no protection against a page being removed so it's as well to check that the pages are numbered. It's also as well to check that the pages say what you intend them t say.
I had a few instances where my witness statements were edited and retyped. This isn't necessarily wrong; the original may have referred to people who were suspects at the time of the original investigation but not before the court for which the statement was being retyped. I did, however, have an instance where the revised statement omitted a piece of negative evidence which could have been of significance to the defence (it was a complaint against the police* so the omission was not a case of the police looking after their own) but was assured that the originals would also be available to the defence. Taking no chances I took copies of the originals to court and found that none of the lawyers had been provided with them.
There was a well-known case of someone being scapegoated for an omission. Nobody raised the issue at trial, not even the defending barrister who subsequently raised the case years later. That part of the evidence was so insignificant that it wasn't even included in the judge's summing up. The guy eventually lost his job. The case was heard in a different jurisdiction from where it was investigated so I suspect the evidence had been retyped in different form and he hadn't noticed the omission when he signed the new document.
* The complainant didn't turn up at court so the hearing didn't actually happen.
"We have now micromanagement, decision making from middle management that clearly have no idea of what we do and how and trying to implement ideas that they read somewhere, with no context, data and not giving answer or addressing feedback."
Nevertheless the product remains reassuringly expensive for those manglements who need to tick the "Is product supported?" box or want somebody to sue if it all anything goes wrong.
I've seen batches of laptops on offer as refurbished with a note that some might have W11 installed and some might not but with instructions as to how to install it (possibly they may have had W10 and the instructions would be how to upgrade although I'd have thought the need for instructions would have been more relevant for those who wished to avoid an upgrade). Of course if I'd bought one neither version of Windows would have been my upgrade.
It looks like they reported down time on the main server but not on the mirrors which would have been more realistic. It also looks as if some (?all) the mirrors were mid-sync. Maybe they needed to completely re-sync to ensure consistency. It's something the .deb world needs to look at in case it's a problem that affects other server/mirror systems.
EDF puts a given amount of energy into the grid. Data4 take a given amount of energy out. Even if it were in some way possible to identify 40MW of the energy they take out as having been put in by EDF it would simply mean that that 40MW was unavailable for other users whose energy might then have to me supplied by burning fossil fuel.
And yet people have been paid to draw up such agreements and publicise them.
Your examples are based on a particular jurisdiction which raises a further interesting problem: so are correct responses. Unless the model is provided with information about the circumstances in which each item i=of training data is applicable and those which are relevant to the prompter then the output, while correct in some cases, may not be for the person to whom it's given.
"one of these prospects released production orders to Broadcom"
Released production orders? Does this mean that they have many other production orders trying to get out? What if some of them escape in a mass breakout? Or refuse to leave if they're released?
"The thing that made Github great (and will likely keep it going for a while) was the network effect "
The network effect is positive feedback. It accelerates ravel in the current direction. That works both ways. Once the movement elsewhere starts it becomes unstoppable.
"My options for doing that are to drop all addresses in the .uk namespace or to not. I do not get to pick and choose."
And if you're a whimsical US president who decides on a whim to drop all country domain addresses in a country that's upset him today, then that would suit you fine. You just pick and choose that country domain.
What do you propose should happen when we, or our children run out of non-renewables? You realise, don't you, that that's what non-renewable means? Wouldn't it be a kindness to leave a little for them, not necessarily as an energy source, but as feedstock for manufacturing?
Living within our means is a requirement for humanity to continue to have a future on this little blue blob.
"The reason Copeland created this default admin user "ONEDAY" with a predictable, daily password was due to customer demand, Weaver explained, because it made it easier for refrigeration contractors to remotely access and control the systems. "
Ah, yes. Convenience. It will be so convenient for service to remotely access the systems to fix them after they've been so inconveniently shut down by miscreant who found it so convenient to log in remotely to break them.
Convenience beats security every time.
"most people who actually did it will tell you that it was an utterly pointless waste of their life "
I'm just young enough to have missed it and was quite happy it turned out that way. OTOH I have some cousins who were caught up. One had a couple of years in, I think, the merchant navy and one in the RAF (non-flying) The both enjoyed it, the RAF one was involved with the reserves running the local air cadets for most of the rest of his life. Another was in the army and a bit younger. He ended up in the Korean war and was, I think, affected by it for the rest of his life. It doesn't pay to generalise.
"Yes, Derek should have RTFM. Has failing to do so led you into trouble?"
The real trouble starts when the manglement read the sales lies blurb and believe it.
No, take a step back - when the vendor reads their specification and believes it. Works in test is not the same as works in production. Works in production on original platform and works in test on ported platform is not the same as works in production on ported platform.
We're dealing with an essentially chaotic system. The really worrying thing is that sufficient change makes prediction unreliable which the even more frightening aspect. If the northern landmasses get colder does longer snow-lie reduce the Earth's albedo sufficiently to push us into a new ice age*? Or does it stabilise a new, intermediate state? Or oscillate between various states over a period of a few decades?
* AKA ending the current inter-glacial.