Re: Just for bots
Probably a good match for some agencies' job ads.
42029 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"I became convinced that no one ever read it"
Always assume that in X months/weeks/days (and it's always sooner than you anticipate) you will be confronted with this piece of code to fix or amend and you won't even remember which idiot wrote it. What would you want in the way of documentation and can there be too much of it?
"Another thing worth mulling is, where would the $43billion come from."
Debt. If he's got that value in assets he can use that as collateral against a loan. Once he's got the company he lumbers it with the loan. Even better is the possibility that he finds someone else to sell it to; after a few cycles the amount of debt sinks the company and Twitter has tweeted its last. Normally I'd think that's a bad thing (e.g. Maplin) but I'm prepared to make exceptions.
"(2) How my sofa is SO much more convenient than an actual bank
(3) How my laptop is SO much better to deal with than a real person"
The reality these days is that actual bank branches are becoming increasingly remote and when you finally complete the treck to one the staff are disempowered and unable to do anything except tell you to go online or ring. Having dissuaded everyone that it's not worth visiting their "local" branch they can close if due to lack of business.
Trying to phone, of course, results in getting a recorded announcement that they're experience an unusual number of calls (for at least the last decade) and you should go online,
The fact that this exposes you to fraud is your problem, not theirs.
"If you're lucky, the windows may be included as well."
I've seen a Will where the testator specified the window panes were to stay with the house. However it was a C16th Will and at that time glass was so expensive that if you had more than one house you might take the glass with you when you went from one to the other.
As regards light fittings, if you've chosen them to your own taste as part of the decor it mages sense to take them. We brought four wall lights here from our last house. I can't remember what we put in their place - probably the sintered spelter pseudo-baroque monstrosities that were in the house when we bought it.
In the UK HMG seems to have somewhat surrendered to the "Let's just forget all about it." wing of the Conservative party so it's not surprising the whole thing is being wound down. It didn't help that the whole thing was given over to someone who's competence is among the lest trusted in the UK IT community. Also the first element - Test - seems to be overlooked; why else have free lateral flow tests been wound down? If you can't test you can't trace.
A good place to start would be to build the option to restore into the automated system. Move the data to a reserve location and only delete it a few days afterwards when it's clear there were no issues. Pretty well very desktop system and every email client has that; it's there for a reason. No, the reason isn't to archive the emails once you've read them.
"we can probably fix it with a firmware flash in a couple of hours."
This was the switch which was just borked by a firmware flash so are we looking at a previous Choose your own adventure?
A. Go without a new coffee machine.
B. Break into the server room at dead of night by fixing the security cameras and access control to administer a firmware update that will bork the switch recoverably.
That's why it's cheaper to borrow. The value of assets is collateral against the debt. If the debt defaulted the lender would take over the assets.
The downside is all on the victim the company being bought. That ends up being saddled with the debt. The interest and payments can become a money pit. Maplin is an example UK readers will be familiar with.
Any Linux-enabled Dell I've looked is way above my budget and AFAICR a poxy small screen job. The current laptop, as near as it gets to be suitable for ageing eyes, came sans-OS from PC-Specialist. In fact they seem to build them with the Windows in the form of an installer but not installed, IYSWIM but installing it would presumably cost money so you still have to blow it away.
"The appearance of applications shouldn’t clash with each other or with the desktop UI."
I'd suggest consistency of function is more important than consistency of appearance. You're never going to get consistency of appearance with, say cross-platform applications. Either they present one appearance on multiple platforms and get slated for not looking native or they're made to look native on their platforms and then there will be complaints about them not looking like the tutorials.
The worse problems are in functional design. There would always be the occasional individual developer or small company going off at a complete tangent and usually producing something really awful, very likely because they wanted to show how different they could be. But the mainstream started off with the old character based CUA and evolved interfaces which were consistent in at least general approach even if their cosmetic appearance varied slightly from one vendor to another. Now we seem to have all manor of variations. Ribbons, flat design, minimalism achieved by removing functionality, or at least hiding it. We have iconography that looks like it was designed in crayon by a three-year-old with no artistic inclinations or a Babylonian making an attempt to draw hieroglyphics with a cuneiform tool set. The best you might hope for is consistency in the current release of a vendor's product line as each team of designers tries to look cooler than their rivals.
"But why do you want to re-arrange a menu?"
Back in '95 and for a few years after that You could arrange the Windows start menu to be easily navigable to find what you want. In recent years it seems to have become an illogical mess. If I pop up the KDE menu it's organised by application group - graphics, internet, office etc. If one of those gets too large I can subdivide it, maybe shunt the less used stuff into a sub.menu. If something seems to fit more than one category I can enter it into those categories.
Of course the expert Windows users go into search and type in the application name. Yes, after all their railing about its supposed prevalence in Linux, they've reinvented the command line.
"99% of users don't."
I think the word you were looking for is "can't".
"-> Thunderbird's UX is horrible
I wonder who put it together. Somebody who has no idea how to design GUI software, I guess."
Standard practice these days. There are options that retain the original interface. Someone will be along to say they look like something from the '90s like that's a bad thing.